Skip to comments.
Time to Prepare for a Hillary Clinton Nomination at the Convention? Stop Hillary now!
StopHillary ^
| 4-25-04
Posted on 04/25/2004 4:18:54 PM PDT by jmstein7
t is very likely that Hillary Rodham Clinton is going to run for Vice-President of the United States in 2004.
Inside the Washington, DC Beltway, the "professional Republicans" do not believe she will run; instead, the conventional wisdom is that she will wait until 2008 and run for the Presidency.
Guess what? These are the very same people who, back in 1992, never thought then-President George H.W. Bush could possibly lose to a draft-dodging, pot-smoking newcomer named Bill Clinton. So they took Clinton lightly and never even attacked his atrocious record in Arkansas!
Then, in 2000, it happened again. When Congressman Rick Lazio ran against Hillary for the US Senate in New York, his campaign was unprepared and afraid to attack her ultra-liberal record.
These two traits over-confidence and fear of attacking Hillarys record are prescriptions for a national disaster: her election this year as Vice-President of the United States.
We can not allow that to happen!
We at the StopHillaryPAC.com are not going to let it happen again!
Right now the Bush Campaign is focused on how to defeat John Kerry. They are not taking Hillary seriously as a Vice-Presidential candidate.
Bill and Hillary Clinton are determined to manipulate the Democratic Party over the next few months until Kerry's running mate has been decided. During this time, Billary will make sure she is in prime contention to run on a Kerry/Clinton national ticket!
If Kerry & Hillary win, we have a national crisis of the first degree, and we could be forced to deal with a Hillary Presidency as early as 2008 as she makes the smooth transition from Vice-President to Presidential candidate.
If she loses? Well, there's no shame in that! Franklin Roosevelt probably did not think his early Vice-Presidential loss was that bad, as he went on to become a four-term President.
We must nip this threat in the bud! We are going to do what those unprepared politicos should be doing: preparing a national campaign ready to begin the very minute Hillary announces she is running for Vice-President.
TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; dncconvention; hildebeast; hillary; hitlary; hitlerclone; hitlersdaughter; hitlery; hrc; kerry; kerrysmamma; mamahillary; powerlust; stophillary; thunderthighs; veep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Personally, based on this latest news about Kerry caught in the latest lie, perhaps Hillary is going for the top spot on the ticket?
1
posted on
04/25/2004 4:18:55 PM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
Ain't gonna happen.
2
posted on
04/25/2004 4:21:21 PM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: jmstein7
It's Hillary at the top. No chance at stopping it though unless the entire 'Rat party stops drinking the Koolaid. Not very likely.
3
posted on
04/25/2004 4:23:54 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Marginalizing the Fascist Left is the only option)
To: jmstein7
IMHO Hillary is sabotaging Kerry's campaign. The question is whether it's to take his place now or to ensure such an election disaster for Kerry that she'll be seen as the pary savior. "Sort of" how Nixon became the savior '68 after the Goldwater slaughter in '64, and how Reagan in '80 became the savior after Gerry Ford's ineffectual presidency and loss to Carter in '76.
To: MEG33
Hillary as the VP candidate, there would be no better way to energize the conservative Republican base and guarantee a huge turnout on election day for G.W. I say GO, HILLERY, GO!!!
5
posted on
04/25/2004 4:24:37 PM PDT
by
Russ
To: jmstein7
Firstly, as I understand it, Kerry has enough delegates COMMITTED to take the nomination. So, unless he refuses said nomination, he will be the candidate. Of course, if he turns up in Ft. Marcy Park.......?? hmmmmm.
6
posted on
04/25/2004 4:27:28 PM PDT
by
lawdude
(Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
To: jmstein7
Naw, Bush is a shoe-in for '04. '08 is Shrillary's year and she doesn't want to go up against a RAT.
7
posted on
04/25/2004 4:28:19 PM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
To: Russ
Hillary will not run in this election..She is a sure vote getter for the Republicans,so not suitable for VP and she wouldn't want the resonsibility of seeing Iraq through as President,better to build up her machine and carp on the sidelines,wait til 08.
8
posted on
04/25/2004 4:30:23 PM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: jmstein7
unfortunately, Rick Lazio got into the race too late (not his fault)--and this is what put him at a disadvantage...
To: jmstein7
Bump
11
posted on
04/25/2004 4:32:11 PM PDT
by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: jmstein7
Too many freepers take Hillary too lightly. Already on this thread there are naysayers. I recall all of the posts here saying she wouldn't be elected to the Senate.
There is an agenda out there folks, and I think it is time some woke up and smelled the socialism, cause Hillary's hand has been at work for months now to defeat President Bush, and it ain't just for the party!
12
posted on
04/25/2004 4:32:34 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
To: Baynative
Well said!
13
posted on
04/25/2004 4:33:19 PM PDT
by
arasina
(So there.)
To: jmstein7
She has a precedent. The New Jersey election was all about establishing a precedent.
14
posted on
04/25/2004 4:33:56 PM PDT
by
bert
(Save People.... Kill Terrorists)
To: jmstein7
He never had sex with...
15
posted on
04/25/2004 4:36:13 PM PDT
by
Smartass
(BUSH & CHENEY 2004 - THE BEST GET BETTER)
To: ladyinred
Hillary will never jump in this year unless Dubyas numbers are totally in the tank.
If the numbers are in the tank it will only be a huge rope-a-dope sending Shrillary and the libs into oblivion.
To: MEG33
Ain't gonna happen.THANK YOU. It appears You and I are the only people in Freeperville who believe this will not happen.
Welcome to the HILLARY WILL NOT RUN IN '04 club...I wonder what the line in Vegas is?
To: jmstein7
Inside the Washington, DC Beltway, the "professional Republicans" do not believe she will run; instead, the conventional wisdom is that she will wait until 2008 and run for the Presidency. That conventional wisdom is tied very closly to the current election and whether Bush or Kerry win.
If Kerry beats Bush and Hillary Clinton is not on the ticket as vice president, she will probably never be president of the United States. Why?
If Kerry wins in 2004, he will likely seek re-election. Hillary would have to mount the first successful challenge to a presidential renomination since McCarthy forced Lyndon Johnson into retirement in 1968. She will have to mount this challenge or sit out the 2008 contest if Kerry wins in 2004.
And, should Kerry be re-elected, his vice president will probably be the Democratic candidate in 2012. If he wins and runs again, she is sitting it out again.
The only shot at running in 2008 is if Bush wins in 2004. So conventional wisdom above is correct only if that same conventional wisdom thinks Kerry is going to lose.
18
posted on
04/25/2004 4:43:11 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: jmstein7
I agree with you. hillary will go for the top spot during the convention.
It's a perfect opportunity - her record is such that she couldn't survive through a long primary, or even a long presidential race. Her celebrity quotient could last through a few months of a campaign.
She'd get the ABB vote (as would any Dem); she has a following of Feminists (that Kerry can't necessarily bring to the polls); and she'd keep all of the Black vote.
If they let Kerry have the nomination, the Dems will be perceived as being as far to the Left as hillary is, and that won't work. She could run as one of bily's centrist Dems in 2004, but that would be harder in 2008 if Kerry is the nominee in 2004.
They'll let Kerry twist in the wind until the convention, then hillary will ride to the rescue. They will, of course, hope that President Bush will have spent all of his money on an anti-Kerry campaign.
To: MEG33
re: Hillary will not run in this election..)))
Whatever else, Hillary is much more powerful than we generally give her credit for. She has much more "love" from the dimwits than we can begin to understand--and I certainly do not understand it. I thought Gephardt would be the Dem candi--goes to show what my instincts are. Maybe it was because he seemed the least of a league of evils.
I've done some research on newsmeat.com looking into the donations of individuals. I see Hillary's name, over and over--and I'm not looking at NY donors, but in states all over the country. This surprised me.
She has lots of pull.
20
posted on
04/25/2004 4:45:47 PM PDT
by
Mamzelle
(for a post-Neo conservatism)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson