Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/08/2004 7:14:38 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 last
To: redlipstick
These guys are just poster boys for "Stupid". I never watch the station, myself.
328 posted on 04/12/2004 5:51:21 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
I found it interesting that Imus slammed Mathews just this morning for his performance, yet continues to make wildassed accusations concerning the President in the very next breath.

I will suggest that boycotting MSNBC is self defeating for those of us that are "political junkies". Better to know what the "opposition" is up too, than to remain in the dark and get blindsided.

Besides, its not like MSNBC carries any weight politically, there are only a couple of hundred thousand that watch it at any given time.
329 posted on 04/12/2004 7:18:41 AM PDT by Badeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
I already boycott MSNBC. I also avoid Imus on the Radio in the morning. Long live FOX news.
330 posted on 04/12/2004 7:43:33 AM PDT by bertmerc1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
I have been boycotting MSNBC for years. I hereby pledge to continue boycotting MSNBC.
335 posted on 04/12/2004 10:03:35 AM PDT by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
Their ratings prove not many people watch anyway.
337 posted on 04/12/2004 10:29:05 AM PDT by Gypssy (Smart, Womanly & Conversative! :-)~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
Does it count if you've never watched MSNBC in the first place? :-)
338 posted on 04/12/2004 10:30:31 AM PDT by k2blader (Some folks should worry less about how conservatives vote and more about how to advance conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
Throw another quarter in for me. I so pledge.
339 posted on 04/12/2004 2:35:03 PM PDT by martian_22 (Who tells you what you are?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
I have never watched msnbc, That bunch of nimcompoops, and I don't plan to start now.
340 posted on 04/12/2004 7:00:20 PM PDT by ChevyZ28 (Most of us would rather be ruined by praise, than saved by criticism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
I don't watch these overly rated idiots haven't for years. no one has to pay me not to watch i do it out of respect for my self.Thanks for the offer.
341 posted on 04/12/2004 7:14:41 PM PDT by solo gringo (Always Ranting Always Rite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
Count me in the boycott.
345 posted on 04/13/2004 7:35:09 AM PDT by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
Boycott MSNBC? What's that? I don't even watch TV! Kill your television set.
346 posted on 04/13/2004 5:36:40 PM PDT by BrucefromMtVernon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
Good thing you had a limit on that!

You'd have to stand near the highway with a sign, "Wil FReep for Food"!

Count me in!

347 posted on 04/15/2004 8:40:38 AM PDT by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
Loyal Fox Fans here
349 posted on 04/17/2004 2:11:03 AM PDT by Duc de Cadore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
Ha ha, Chris Matthews. When Clark was going before the 9/11 commission and spouting off against Bush, and it looked like the commission would hurt Bush's poll numbers, it was a non-partisan, wonderful thing. Then after Condi testified and wiped the floor with the administration's critics, it suddenly became a place of partisan bickering with no real political value. He's a joke.
350 posted on 04/17/2004 2:17:37 AM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
I share your antipathy, but cannot take the pledge, due to my philosophy of keeping tabs on one's enemies.

I will offer some consolation however. They are preaching to the choir. '04 will be a repeat of '00 demographically. The middle 6% will decide things. This group thinks more carefully about issues! (The reason? Anyone who is not strongly D or R and who doesn't think about the issues, isn't very likely to vote.)
Thus, the septic mutterings of Imus/Stern/Franken et al only makes Bush look better to the undecideds. Stirring up the Demo lumpenproletariat is BAD strategy for the Dems, but (ha ha) there's nothing the DNC can do about all their wonderful 'supporters'.

See you all in November for a victory celeb. And...

Remember, you heard it here first.

351 posted on 04/17/2004 5:51:40 AM PDT by ARepublicanForAllReasons (A socialist is just a communist who has run out of bullets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
I have been boycotting them for 4 years... Does my post still count?
352 posted on 04/17/2004 3:24:31 PM PDT by Diva Betsy Ross (Every heart beats true for the red ,white and blue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson