Posted on 03/13/2004 11:53:26 AM PST by js1138
Critical Analysis of Evolution Grade 10
Life Sciences
Benchmark H
Describe a foundation of biological evolution as the change in gene frequency of a population over time. Explain the historical and current scientific developments, mechanisms and processes of biological evolution. Describe how scientists continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory. (The intent of this benchmark does not mandate the teaching or testing of intelligent design.)
Indicator 23
Describe how scientists continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory. (The intent of this indicator does not mandate the teaching or testing of intelligent design.)
Scientific Ways of Knowing
Benchmark A
Explain that scientific knowledge must be based on evidence, be predictive, logical, subject to modification and limited to the natural world.
Indicator 2
Describe that scientists may disagree about explanations of phenomena, about interpretation of data or about the value of rival theories, but they do agree that questioning, response to criticism and open communication are integral to the process of science.
Indicator 3
Recognize that science is a systematic method of continuing investigation, based on observation, hypothesis testing, measurement, experimentation, and theory building, which leads to more adequate explanations of natural phenomena.
Lesson Summary:
This lesson allows students to critically analyze five different aspects of evolutionary theory. As new scientific data emerge, scientists understandings of the natural world may become enhanced, modified or even changed all together. Using library and Internet sources, groups of students will conduct background research for one of the aspects of evolution in preparation for a critical analysis discussion. Students also will listen to, and take notes on, their classmates' critical analyses of evolution theory.
Estimated Duration: Four to six hours
Commentary:
This lesson should be used midway or toward the end of a unit on evolution. This will allow students to carry over their knowledge of basic evolutionary concepts into this lesson. The strength of this lesson lies in having students research topics that interest them about evolutionary biology. Students are encouraged to consider the research and discuss their findings with fellow students.
Pre-Assessment:
· The following items can be used to stimulate dialogue with the students.
· Instruct students to copy the following items from the chalkboard in their science lab notebook.
1. Describe anomalies and explain why they exist.
2. Are there any benefits to exploring scientific anomalies?
3. How do scientists make and test predictions?
4. How do scientists critically analyze conflicting data?
5. Define the following terms in your own words:
§ Theory
§ Critical analysis
§ Natural selection
§ Biological evolution
§ Macroevolution
§ Microevolution
· Direct students to respond to the questions in their science notebook in as much detail as possible leaving space to record information from the ensuing dialogue to add to their notes.
Scoring Guidelines:
Collect pre-assessments and evaluate for indication of prior knowledge and/or misconception. Sample definitions for question five in the pre-assessment include, but are not limited to, the following:
· Theory
A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained.
· Critical analysis
The separation of an intellectual idea into its constituent parts for the purpose of a careful, exact evaluation and judgment about those parts and their interrelationships in making up a whole. (This definition combines the definition for critical and analysis.)
· Natural selection
The principle that in a given environment, individuals having characteristics that aid survival will produce more offspring, and the proportion of individuals having such characteristics will increase with each succeeding generation.
· Biological evolution
Changes in the genetic composition of a population through successive generations.
· Macroevolution
Large-scale evolution occurring over geologic time that results in the formation of new taxonomic groups.
· Microevolution
Evolution resulting from a succession of relatively small genetic variations that often cause the formation of new subspecies.
Post-Assessment:
Instructional Procedures:
Instructional Tip:
Scientists make a distinction between two areas of evolutionary theory. First, scientists consider mutation, natural selection, genetic drift and gene flow (immigration and emigration) as the processes that generate evolutionary changes in organisms and populations. Second, the theory of universal common descent describes the historical pattern of biological change. This theory maintains that all living forms have descended from earlier living forms and ultimately from a single common ancestor. Darwin envisioned the theory of universal common descent as a necessary result of evolutionary changes in organisms and populations, and represented it in his branching tree of life. Students will investigate and analyze these two areas of evolutionary theory in this lesson.
In addition to the distinctions between different areas of evolutionary theory, scientists also find it helpful to distinguish amounts of biological change or evolution. Microevolution refers to evolution resulting from a succession of relatively small genetic variations that often cause the formation of new subspecies. Macroevolution refers to large-scale evolution occurring over geologic time that results in the formation of new taxonomic groups. These terms are helpful distinctions in the course of analyzing evolutionary theory. These terms have appeared in OhioLink research databases, numerous Internet sites, and biology and evolution textbooks. Though micro and macro are prefixes, it is quite clear that the scientific community recognizes and acknowledges the distinction between the words. To help ensure academic clarity, this lesson distinguishes between microevolution and macroevolution. Teachers may need to provide support to students to help them understand this distinction throughout the lesson.
Student Engagement
· Spontaneous generation versus biogenesis
Several pieces of data could be used. One example is Francesco Redis observation that flies must contact meat in order for maggots to appear on the meat.
· Geocentric versus Heliocentric
Several pieces of data could be used. One example is the observed phases of Venus.
Instructional Tip:
Alternative strategies for beginning this lesson could be to engage students in a Socratic discussion or a mini-lecture. See the Web site for student research at the Los Alamos National Laboratory for guidelines on the Socratic method. The Web address is listed in the Technology Connections section.
Student Research
Aspect 1: Homology (anatomical and molecular)
Aspect 2: Fossil Record
Aspect 3: Anti-Biotic Resistance
Aspect 4: Peppered Moths
Aspect 5: Endosymbiosis
Instructional Tip:
Attachment B, Investigative Worksheet, has questions that can be applied to all five aspects. This will help students become familiar with the data, and therefore be able to critically analyze the evidence for either the supporting side or the challenging side. As they complete the worksheet, the group members may all work together on each question, or divide the questions among themselves and then share their findings as a group.
Instructional Tip:
Encourage all students to participate in the critical analysis activity because the experience will be a learning opportunity. Be prepared, however, to distribute alternate assignments to students who do not want to participate.
Differentiated Instructional Support:
Instruction is differentiated according to learner needs, to help all learners either meet the intent of the specified indicator(s) or, if the indicator is already met, to advance beyond the specified indicator(s).
Extension:
Have students consider other aspects of evolutionary biology that are critically analyzed by scientists. Possible topics include:
|
|
Interdisciplinary Connections: |
|
Social Studies Skills and Methods Standard |
|
|
|
Benchmark A |
Evaluate the reliability and credibility of sources. |
Indicator 1 |
Determine the credibility of sources by considering the following: a. The qualifications and reputation of the writer; b. Agreement with other credible sources; c. Recognition of stereotypes; d. Accuracy and consistency of sources; e. The circumstances in which the author prepared the source. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
English Language Arts Research Standard |
|
|
|
Benchmark B |
Evaluate the usefulness and credibility of data and sources. |
Indicator 3 |
Determine the accuracy of sources and the credibility of the author by analyzing the sources validity (e.g., authority, accuracy, objectivity, publication date and coverage, etc.). |
Benchmark C |
Organize information from various resources and select appropriate sources to support central ideas, concepts and themes. |
Indicator 2 |
Identify appropriate sources and gather relevant information from multiple sources (e.g., school library catalogs, online databases, electronic resources and Internet-based resources). |
Indicator 4 |
Evaluate and systematically organize important information, and select appropriate sources to support central ideas, concepts and themes. |
Materials and Resources:
The inclusion of a specific resource in any lesson formulated by the Ohio Department of Education should not be interpreted as an endorsement of that particular resource, or any of its contents, by the Ohio Department of Education. The Ohio Department of Education does not endorse any particular resource. The Web addresses listed are for a given sites main page, therefore, it may be necessary to search within that site to find the specific information required for a given lesson. Please note that information published on the Internet changes over time, therefore the links provided may no longer contain the specific information related to a given lesson. Teachers are advised to preview all sites before using them with students.
For the teacher: attachments, resource materials such as the Internet, World Wide Web, library resources
For the student: attachments, resource materials such as the Internet, World Wide Web, library resources
Vocabulary:
Technology Connections:
Research Connections:
Marzano, R. et al. Classroom Instruction that Works: Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Alexandria: Associat ion for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2001.
General Tips:
1. Ayala, Francisco, "The Mechanisms of Evolution." Scientific American, 239:3 (1978): 56-69.
Attachments:
Attachment A, Five Aspects of Evolution
Attachment B, Investigative Worksheet
Attachment A
Five Aspects of Evolution
Aspect 1: Homology
Citations in the General Tips Section may provide a starting point for student research. It is suggested that students employ additional resources in their research.
Brief Supporting Sample Answer: Different animals have very similar anatomical and genetic structures. This suggests that these animals share a common ancestor from which they inherited the genes to build these anatomical structures. Evolutionary biologists call similarities that are due to common ancestry homologies. For example, the genes that produce hemoglobin molecules (an oxygen carrying protein) in chimps and humans are at least 98% identical in sequence. As another example, bats, humans, horses, porpoises and moles all share a forelimb that has the same pattern of bone structure and organization. The hemoglobin molecule and the pentadactyl limb provide evidence for common ancestors. Also, the genetic code is universal, suggesting that a common ancestor is the source.
Brief Challenging Sample Answer: Some scientists think similarities in anatomical and genetic structure reflect similar functional needs in different animals, not common ancestry. The nucleotide sequence of hemoglobin DNA is very similar between chimps and humans, but this may be because they provide the same function for both animals. Also, if similar anatomical structures really are the result of a shared evolutionary ancestry, then similar anatomical structures should be produced by related genes and patterns of embryological development. However, sometimes, similar anatomical structures in different animals are built from different genes and by different pathways of embryological development. Scientists can use these different anatomical structures and genes to build versions of Darwin family trees that will not match each other. This shows that diverse forms of life may have different ancestry.
Aspect 2: Fossil Record
Citations in the General Tips Section may provide a starting point for student research. It is suggested that students employ additional resources in their research.
Brief Supporting Sample Answer: The fossil record shows an increase in the complexity of living forms from simple one-celled organisms, to the first simple plants and animals, to the diverse and complex organisms that live on Earth today. This pattern suggests that later forms evolved from earlier simple forms over long periods of geological time. Macroevolution is the large-scale evolution occurring over geologic time that results in the formation of new taxonomic groups. The slow transformations are reflected in transitional fossils such as Archaeopteryx (a reptile-like bird) and mammal-like reptiles. These transitional fossils bridge the gap from one species to another species and from one branch on the tree of life to another.
Brief Challenging Sample Answer: Transitional fossils are rare in the fossil record. A growing number of scientists now question that Archaeopteryx and other transitional fossils really are transitional forms. The fossil record as a whole shows that major evolutionary changes took place suddenly over brief periods of time followed by longer periods of stasis during which no significant change in form or transitional organisms appeared (Punctuated Equilibria). The Cambrian explosion of animal phyla is the best known, but not the only example, of the sudden appearance of new biological forms in the fossil record.
Aspect 3: Antibiotic Resistance
Citations in the General Tips Section may provide a starting point for student research. It is suggested that students employ additional resources in their research.
Brief Supporting Sample Answer: The number of strains of antibiotic resistant bacteria, such as of Staphylococcus aureus, have significantly increased in number over time. Antibiotics used by patients to eliminate disease-causing bacterial organisms have facilitated this change. When some bacteria acquire a mutation that allows them to survive in the presence of antibiotics, they begin to survive in greater numbers than those that do not have this mutation-induced resistance. This shows how environmental changes and natural selection can produce significant changes in populations and species over time.
Brief Challenging Sample Answer: The increase in the number of antibiotic resistant bacterial strains demonstrates the power of natural selection to produce small but limited changes in populations and species. It does not demonstrate the ability of natural selection to produce new forms of life. Although new strains of Staphylococcus aureus have evolved, the speciation of bacteria (prokaryotes) has not been observed, and neither has the evolution of bacteria into more complex eukaryotes. Thus, the phenomenon of antibiotic resistance demonstrates microevolution.
Aspect 4: Peppered Moths (Biston betularia)
Citations in the General Tips Section may provide a starting point for student research. It is suggested that students employ additional resources in their research.
Brief Supporting Sample Answer: During the industrial revolution in England, more soot was released into the air. As a result, the tree trunks in the woodlands grew darker in color. This environmental change also produced a change in the population of English peppered moths (scientifically known as Biston betularia). Studies during the 1950s have suggested a reason for this change. It was observed that light-colored moths resting on dark-colored tree trunks were readily eaten by birds. They had become more visible by their predators compared to their dark-colored counterparts. This different exposure to predation explained why the light-colored moths died with greater frequency when pollution darkened the forest. It also explained why light-colored moths later made a comeback when air quality improved in England. This whole situation demonstrates how the process of natural selection can change the features of a population over time.
Brief Challenging Sample Answer: English peppered moths show that environmental changes can produce microevolutionary changes within a population. They do not show that natural selection can produce major new features or forms of life, or a new species for that matteri.e., macroevolutionary changes. From the beginning of the industrial revolution, English peppered moths came in both light and dark varieties. After the pollution decreased, dark and light varieties still existed. All that changed during this time was the relative proportion of the two traits within the population. No new features and no new species emerged. In addition, recent scientific articles have questioned the factual basis of the study performed during the 1950s. Scientists have learned that peppered moths do not actually rest on tree trunks. This has raised questions about whether color changes in the moth population were actually caused by differences in exposure to predatory birds.
Aspect 5: Endosymbiosis (formation of cellular organelles)
Citations in the General Tips Section may provide a starting point for student research. It is suggested that students employ additional resources in their research.
Brief Supporting Sample Answer: Complex eukaryotic cells contain organelles such as chloroplasts and mitochondria. These organelles have their own DNA. This suggests that bacterial cells may have become established in cells that were ancestral to eukaryotes. These smaller cells existed for a time in a symbiotic relationship within the larger cell. Later, the smaller cell evolved into separate organelles within the eukaryotic ancestors. The separate organelles, chloroplast and mitochondria, within modern eukaryotes stand as evidence of this evolutionary change.
Brief Challenging Sample Answer: Laboratory tests have not yet demonstrated that small bacteria (prokaryotic cells) can change into separate organelles, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts within larger bacterial cells. When smaller bacterial cells (prokaryotes) are absorbed by larger bacterial cells, they are usually destroyed by digestion. Although some bacterial cells (prokaryotes) can occasionally live in eukaryotes, scientists have not observed these cells changing into organelles such as mitochondria or chloroplasts.
Attachment B
This activity will help you to prepare for the critical analysis activity. Complete the following table by addressing the following points when you record supporting and challenging data for one aspect of evolution. Record your responses on the appropriate space on the chart.
faith ( P ) Pronunciation Key (fth)
n.
- Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
- Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence. See Synonyms at belief. See Synonyms at trust.
- Loyalty to a person or thing; allegiance: keeping faith with one's supporters.
- often Faith Christianity. The theological virtue defined as secure belief in God and a trusting acceptance of God's will.
- The body of dogma of a religion: the Muslim faith.
- A set of principles or beliefs.
It is the first, main definition above that applies to a hypothesis, and science as a whole.
Every hypothesis makes a proposition of faith, otherwise there would be no object or purpose in creating the hypothesis. Hypotheses are created/designed with a purpose in mind, namely to lay a foundation for seeking the truth. If one has no belief or confidence in either the hypothesis or its testing then what would be the purpose of creating a hypothesis in the first place?
No matter your opinion on the subject, in the end it comes down to faith. I am not saying that God could not have created the world through an evolutionary process, but rather that He clearly states in His Word how the universe was formed. He spoke, and the universe leapt into existence. At this point in the debate it comes down to whether one expresses faith in God or faith in Man. I choose God, hands down.
Matthew 4
5. Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple.
6. "If you are the Son of God," he said, "throw yourself down. For it is written: "`He will command his angels concerning you, and they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.' "
7. Jesus answered him, "It is also written: `Do not put the Lord your God to the test.' "
Deuteronomy 6:16 Do not test the LORD your God as you did at Massah.
Different translations use 'tempt' instead of 'test'
KJV Psalms 95:9 When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my work.
ASV Psalms 95:9 When your fathers tempted me, Proved me, and saw my work.
ASV Exodus 17:7 And he called the name of the place Massah, and Meribah, because of the striving of the children of Israel, and because they tempted Jehovah, saying, Is Jehovah among us, or not?
KJV Exodus 17:7 And he called the name of the place Massah, and Meribah, because of the chiding of the children of Israel, and because they tempted the Lord, saying, Is the Lord among us, or not?
KJV Deuteronomy 6:16 Ye shall not tempt the Lord your God, as ye tempted him in Massah.
ASV Deuteronomy 6:16 Ye shall not tempt Jehovah your God, as ye tempted him in Massah.
|
Deuteronomy 9:23b ...... But you rebelled against the command of the LORD your God. You did not trust him or obey him. 24 You have been rebellious against the LORD ever since I have known you.Psalms 95:9 ..... where your fathers tested and tried me, though they had seen what I did.Exodus 17:7 .... because they tested the LORD saying, "Is the LORD among us or not?"
Judges 61. Again the Israelites did evil in the eyes of the LORD, and for seven years he gave them into the hands of the Midianites.
2. Because the power of Midian was so oppressive, the Israelites prepared shelters for themselves in mountain clefts, caves and strongholds.
3. Whenever the Israelites planted their crops, the Midianites, Amalekites and other eastern peoples invaded the country.
4. They camped on the land and ruined the crops all the way to Gaza and did not spare a living thing for Israel, neither sheep nor cattle nor donkeys.
5. They came up with their livestock and their tents like swarms of locusts. It was impossible to count the men and their camels; they invaded the land to ravage it.
6. Midian so impoverished the Israelites that they cried out to the LORD for help.
7. When the Israelites cried to the LORD because of Midian,
8. he sent them a prophet, who said, "This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: I brought you up out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.
9. I snatched you from the power of Egypt and from the hand of all your oppressors. I drove them from before you and gave you their land.
10. I said to you, `I am the LORD your God; do not worship the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you live.' But you have not listened to me."
11. The angel of the LORD came and sat down under the oak in Ophrah that belonged to Joash the Abiezrite, where his son Gideon was threshing wheat in a winepress to keep it from the Midianites.
12. When the angel of the LORD appeared to Gideon, he said, "The LORD is with you, mighty warrior."
13. "But sir," Gideon replied, "if the LORD is with us, why has all this happened to us? Where are all his wonders that our fathers told us about when they said, `Did not the LORD bring us up out of Egypt?' But now the LORD has abandoned us and put us into the hand of Midian."
14. The LORD turned to him and said, "Go in the strength you have and save Israel out of Midian's hand. Am I not sending you?"
15. "But Lord, " Gideon asked, "how can I save Israel? My clan is the weakest in Manasseh, and I am the least in my family."
16. The LORD answered, "I will be with you, and you will strike down all the Midianites together."
17. Gideon replied, "If now I have found favor in your eyes, give me a sign that it is really you talking to me.
18. Please do not go away until I come back and bring my offering and set it before you." And the LORD said, "I will wait until you return."
19. Gideon went in, prepared a young goat, and from an ephah of flour he made bread without yeast. Putting the meat in a basket and its broth in a pot, he brought them out and offered them to him under the oak.
20. The angel of God said to him, "Take the meat and the unleavened bread, place them on this rock, and pour out the broth." And Gideon did so.
21. With the tip of the staff that was in his hand, the angel of the LORD touched the meat and the unleavened bread. Fire flared from the rock, consuming the meat and the bread. And the angel of the LORD disappeared.
22. When Gideon realized that it was the angel of the LORD, he exclaimed, "Ah, Sovereign LORD! I have seen the angel of the LORD face to face!"
23. But the LORD said to him, "Peace! Do not be afraid. You are not going to die."
24. So Gideon built an altar to the LORD there and called it The LORD is Peace. To this day it stands in Ophrah of the Abiezrites.
25. That same night the LORD said to him, "Take the second bull from your father's herd, the one seven years old. Tear down your father's altar to Baal and cut down the Asherah pole beside it.
26. Then build a proper kind of altar to the LORD your God on the top of this height. Using the wood of the Asherah pole that you cut down, offer the second bull as a burnt offering."
27. So Gideon took ten of his servants and did as the LORD told him. But because he was afraid of his family and the men of the town, he did it at night rather than in the daytime.
28. In the morning when the men of the town got up, there was Baal's altar, demolished, with the Asherah pole beside it cut down and the second bull sacrificed on the newly built altar!
29. They asked each other, "Who did this?" When they carefully investigated, they were told, "Gideon son of Joash did it."
30. The men of the town demanded of Joash, "Bring out your son. He must die, because he has broken down Baal's altar and cut down the Asherah pole beside it."
31. But Joash replied to the hostile crowd around him, "Are you going to plead Baal's cause? Are you trying to save him? Whoever fights for him shall be put to death by morning! If Baal really is a god, he can defend himself when someone breaks down his altar."
32. So that day they called Gideon "Jerub-Baal, " saying, "Let Baal contend with him," because he broke down Baal's altar.
33. Now all the Midianites, Amalekites and other eastern peoples joined forces and crossed over the Jordan and camped in the Valley of Jezreel.
34. Then the Spirit of the LORD came upon Gideon, and he blew a trumpet, summoning the Abiezrites to follow him.
35. He sent messengers throughout Manasseh, calling them to arms, and also into Asher, Zebulun and Naphtali, so that they too went up to meet them.
36. Gideon said to God, "If you will save Israel by my hand as you have promised--
37. look, I will place a wool fleece on the threshing floor. If there is dew only on the fleece and all the ground is dry, then I will know that you will save Israel by my hand, as you said."
38. And that is what happened. Gideon rose early the next day; he squeezed the fleece and wrung out the dew--a bowlful of water.
39. Then Gideon said to God, "Do not be angry with me. Let me make just one more request. Allow me one more test with the fleece. This time make the fleece dry and the ground covered with dew."
40. That night God did so. Only the fleece was dry; all the ground was covered with dew.
John 20:24-29
24. Now Thomas (called Didymus), one of the Twelve, was not with the disciples when Jesus came.
25. So the other disciples told him, "We have seen the Lord!" But he said to them, "Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe it."
26. A week later his disciples were in the house again, and Thomas was with them. Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, "Peace be with you!"
27. Then he said to Thomas, "Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe."
28. Thomas said to him, "My Lord and my God!"
29. Then Jesus told him, "Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed."
1. Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.
2. This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God,
3. but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world.
4. You, dear children, are from God and have overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world.
5. They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them.
6. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.
Matthew 77. "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you.
8. For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who knocks, the door will be opened.Hebrews 3:14-15
14. We have come to share in Christ if we hold firmly till the end the confidence we had at first.
15. As has just been said: "Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts as you did in the rebellion."Hebrews 4:16
Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.Hebrews 10:19-22
19. Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the Most Holy Place by the blood of Jesus,
20. by a new and living way opened for us through the curtain, that is, his body,
21. and since we have a great priest over the house of God,
22. let us draw near to God with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled to cleanse us from a guilty conscience and having our bodies washed with pure water.Hebrews 10:35
So do not throw away your confidence; it will be richly rewarded.Hebrews 13:6
So we say with confidence, "The Lord is my helper; I will not be afraid. What can man do to me?"1 John 2:28
And now, dear children, continue in him, so that when he appears we may be confident and unashamed before him at his coming.1 John 3:21-23
21. Dear friends, if our hearts do not condemn us, we have confidence before God
22. and receive from him anything we ask, because we obey his commands and do what pleases him.23. And this is his command: to believe in the name of his Son, Jesus Christ, and to love one another as he commanded us.1 John 4:17-19
17. In this way, love is made complete among us so that we will have confidence on the day of judgment, because in this world we are like him.
18. There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love.
19. We love because he first loved us.1 John 5:14-15
14. This is the confidence we have in approaching God: that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us.
15. And if we know that he hears us--whatever we ask--we know that we have what we asked of him.
In season and out......
Nope. A book (the Bible) says the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob created the world in six days.
In order for an observer to recognize the difference between two phoenomena, the phenomena themselves must each exhibit distinct characteristics. Otherwise the observer would not be able to tell them apart.
What is the cause for two distinct objects appearing differently to an observer? Randomness does not facilitate distinguishability between objects.
I understand.
This statement is false as it stands. For example, randomly taken measurements on two sets of trees gives us an idea of how tall one set is, whereas a non-random could be chosen to take the tallest of the smaller set and vice versa. Clearly, randomizing allows these sets to be distinguished.
Could you explain what you are trying to get at. (Also give us some idea of what you think is meant by randomness.)
Your point is focused on the subject of observation. Mine point is focused on the object, just as the universe is the object of human observation. Unless the object is distinguishable from others of its kind, random tests will produce no results. A non-random process must in some manner or to some degree, comprise one or both objects.
When I use the word "randomness" I mean "having no specific pattern or purpose."
If an object isn't distinguishable from others, no test will tell them apart, with or without a random component. This has nothing to do with your original statement.
"having no specific pattern or purpose."
Again partly false. I often generate "random" objects with various purposes in mind: cryptography, un-biased selection, etc. The phrase "specific pattern" isn't well defined; any given pattern will occur with probability one in a random environment.
That is why we need a universe the is suffused with design. Without it we could not make meaningful observations.
This has nothing to do with your original statement.
Not try to be obtuse here (it comes naturally), but which original statement?
I often generate "random" objects with various purposes in mind . . .
It does not surprise me in the least that human intelligence can make use of randomness as a tool, but your focus once again is on the subject of observation (namely yourself), and not the object. Without form or design in the object you are observing, namely the universe, you would have nothing to comprehend.
Well, DOH!
Now, why don't you use your intelligence to design a testable hypothesis for whatever it is you're trying to convince us of?
Because it seems to me to be rather redundant to propose a testable hypothesis to demonstrate intelligent design is present and operative in the universe when the hypothesis is an instrument of intelligent design in and of itself.
But maybe the request is for a testable hypothesis to demonstrate how intelligent design comes about, or what is the extent of its manifestation in the known universe, or whether intelligent design can exist without a mechanism to drive it, or whether intelligent design is a necessary attribute of both the subject and object of science before science can even begin its work.
Take your pick from any of the above, and I will try to create a hypothesis to suit it. At the same time, I would ask that those who support the Theory of Evolution design a testable hypothesis to demonstrate the mechanism whereby a living species can emerge without the agents of either intelligence or design.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.