Skip to comments.
UK: While digging in backyard man unearths hoard of 20,000 Roman coins.
BBC On-Line ^
| Thursday, 11 March, 2004
| staff writer
Posted on 03/11/2004 9:12:07 AM PST by yankeedame
Last Updated: Thursday, 11 March, 2004, 11:45 GMT
Roman treasure found in pond dig
The coins are thought to date from the 4th century
A man unearthed a priceless hoard of 20,000 Roman coins as he dug a new fishpond in his back garden. Experts say the money may date from the 4th Century and could be the biggest find of its kind in Britain.
The coins were crammed into a ceramic pot which broke up as it was dug out of the ground at Thornbury, Gloucestershire.
Now a coroner must decide if Ken Allen, who made the discovery, can keep the treasure.
Gail Boyle, from Bristol Museum, said: "This is the most amazing find of treasure to come out of this area for 30 years."
Mr Allen said: "It was a great surprise and at first I didn't realise what we had found.
"The pot was perfectly upright, I can't believe that this discovery was only 20ft from our house."
"I can't believe that this discovery was only 20ft from our house,"- Ken Allen
Kurt Adams, the Finds Liaison Officer for Gloucestershire and Avon, said: "The coins identified so far can be attributed to Constantine the Great.
"The mint marks - a letter or symbol used to indicate the mint which produced the coin - suggest Trier, Germany and Constantinople as possible places of origin."
Treasure trove
The coins are in the care of Bristol City Museum & Art Gallery where they are being cleaned in a special laboratory.
They will then be taken to the British Museum in London for further examination.
A spokeswoman for Bristol Coroner's Court said that even though the coins were found on Mr Allen's property they could still be ruled as being property of the state.
"What determines this is if the coins were buried there intentionally or lost.
"It is possible somebody put them there and forgot about them, or never intended for them to be found.
"The coroner can rule whether they are the finder's treasure or not."
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: ancientrome; archeology; artifacts; coins; england; epigraphyandlanguage; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; privateproperty; propertyofthestate; propertyrights; romancoins; romanempire; treasure; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: yankeedame
There is alot of history in Britian. It took the Athens subway about 20 years to go 3 miles - every 10 feet they had to stop and investigate all the artificats that were found...
2
posted on
03/11/2004 9:14:19 AM PST
by
2banana
To: yankeedame
Amazing that these things are still being unearthed!
Roma Victa!
3
posted on
03/11/2004 9:16:50 AM PST
by
ffusco
(Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
To: yankeedame
The coins were deliberately buried when Roman governor Franklinus Delanus Rooseveltus ordered the confiscation of all coins of precious metal in order to replace them with notes from the Bancus Brittanorum.
4
posted on
03/11/2004 9:17:10 AM PST
by
Publius
(Die Erde ist gewaltig schön, doch sicher ist sie nicht.)
To: yankeedame
"Now a coroner must decide if Ken Allen, who made the discovery, can keep the treasure."Fat chance, Ken.
5
posted on
03/11/2004 9:17:10 AM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: yankeedame
A spokeswoman for Bristol Coroner's Court said that even though the coins were found on Mr Allen's property they could still be ruled as being property of the state.
"What determines this is if the coins were buried there intentionally or lost.
The intentions of the 4th century owner would be impossible to determine, therefore they belong to the state.
Everything rightfully belongs to the state.
6
posted on
03/11/2004 9:17:27 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: yankeedame
"It is possible somebody put them there and forgot about them..." Put an advert in the lost and found column of the daily newspaper. If "he" doesn't come around to claim them, then he certainly has forgotten about them.
7
posted on
03/11/2004 9:17:46 AM PST
by
weegee
('...Kerry is like that or so a crack sausage.')
To: blam
ping!
8
posted on
03/11/2004 9:18:25 AM PST
by
annyokie
(There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
To: yankeedame
Since England would have been a part of the Roman Empire, to which "State" should the coins go? Back to Rome? Or to the British Museum?
9
posted on
03/11/2004 9:19:56 AM PST
by
weegee
('...Kerry is like that or so a crack sausage.')
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: yankeedame
They should let him keep it. What crap!!
To: yankeedame
Read later.
To: yankeedame
quick...buy stock in British metal detectors. The craze will be re-ignited.
13
posted on
03/11/2004 9:21:47 AM PST
by
Mark Felton
(Antiestablishedpartymentarianist)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: 2banana
There is alot of history in Britian. It took the Athens subway about 20 years to go 3 miles - every 10 feet they had to stop and investigate all the artificats that were found...This is every treasure hunter's dream! Incidentally, it took Boston 14 years and 15 billion dollars to go 2 miles underground - but that has nothing to do with artifacts.
To: weegee
***""It is possible somebody put them there and forgot about them..."***
It's more likely that someone hid them before getting whacked.
They belong to the finder. They aren't English coins. The Roman empire no longer exists. The answer can't be more obvious to me.
To: 2banana
"they could still be ruled as being property of the state."
They will.
"It is possible somebody put them there and forgot about them, or never intended for them to be found."
Or never intended them to be found and died before they recovered them?
"The coroner can rule whether they are the finder's treasure or not."
Shucks, I can just see a "public" servant ruling in favor of the "public". He should have told nobody and sold them one at a time. The very fact that they were buried in the ground means that the depositer "never intended for them to be found".
"What determines this is if the coins were buried there intentionally or lost".
When coins get "lost" they usually find a pot and plant themselves in the ground.
Interesting. If I ever find anthing of value, the last thing that I will do is tell my government. The would claim first "dibs" and all I would be left with is the broken pottery.
Blessings, Bobo
17
posted on
03/11/2004 9:26:10 AM PST
by
bobo1
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: cannothave2masters
A coroner? What is the basis of his legal authority and mandate? We're not talking about cause of death here.
To: yankeedame
"It is possible somebody put them there and forgot about them, or never intended for them to be found. You can't make this stuff and satire is over.
20
posted on
03/11/2004 9:26:52 AM PST
by
don-o
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson