Posted on 03/11/2004 3:42:15 AM PST by kattracks
If Sen. John Kerry, D-MA, beats President Bush and Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, is not on the Democratic ticket as a vice presidential candidate, she will probably never be president of the United States. This cold, hard fact is staring the Clintons in the face as they assess the best way to inaugurate a new Clinton presidency.
Consider the options and their historic contexts:
If Kerry wins in 2004, he will very likely seek re-election. The last time a president served four years and didnt try to succeed himself was back in 1880 and the president was Rutherford B. Hayes. So, unless Hillary wants to try to mount the first successful challenge to a presidential renomination since Gene McCarthy forced Lyndon Johnson into retirement in 1968, she will have to sit out the 2008 contest.
Should Kerry be re-elected, his vice president will probably be the Democratic candidate in 2012. All five times, since 1960, that a vice president sought the nomination for president after his party controlled the White House for at least two terms he has gotten it (Richard Nixon in 1960, Hubert Humphrey in 1968, Gerald Ford in 1976, George H.W. Bush in 1988, Al Gore in 2000). That means that Hillary would be out in the cold until at least 2016 and, if the Democrat won and was re-elected, until 2020. Shell be 73 by then.
Even if Kerry is elected and loses a bid for a second term, his vice president would still be the favorite in 2012. Twice, since 1960, a man who served as vice president has come back in a subsequent year to win his partys nomination Nixon in 1968 and Walter Mondale in 1984. Humphrey failed to get the nod in 1972, but he had already run and lost four years before. Dan Quayle failed also, but he was, well, Quayle.
If Bush is re-elected, Hillary doesnt need to have been on Kerrys ticket. She can still prevail in 2008 over Kerrys defeated vice presidential nominee. After all, neither Ed Muskie in 1972, Bob Dole in 1996 nor Joe Lieberman in 2004 was able to convert a losing bid for vice president into a successful race for president (two of the three werent even nominated).
But if Kerry wins and another person is vice president, how will Hillary keep fresh until 2012? In the Senate while all the Democratic action is at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue? And how will she compete with a sitting vice president who has all the resources of the White House at his disposal and eight years to build up his momentum?
She cant, and she wont.
So what should she do? If Kerry is anywhere close to Bush at convention time, shed better go for the second spot. A close defeat wouldnt hurt her and, if Kerry wins, it will be her only way to become the second President Clinton.
And dont kid yourself; the decision is Hillarys to make. The Clintons still control the Democratic Party. If Hillary wants to run for vice president, Kerry has to go along. For him to spurn the former first lady would be to cause a schism in the party. Hell be pulling knives out of his back for the entire race.
In any case, it is in Kerrys interest to ensure that the Clintons will work for him and not undermine his candidacy. The logic of their need for a Bush re-election to assure a Hillary presidency is just too compelling. Kerry needs to put Hillary on his ticket as a kind of hostage to be certain of the Clintons strong and full support. There are just too many ways that the Clintons can sabotage his candidacy without seeming to be doing so. (For example, Bill can publish his memoirs in September or October of 2004 and create a massive distraction that would force Kerry off center stage).
Kerry needs Hillary on the ticket. A vice presidential candidacy by her would turn his campaign into a crusade and would energize her supporters to a fever pitch. It would summon all the good memories of the Clinton prosperity without the bad reminders of Monica, et. al. But, most of all, Kerry cannot afford to leave the Clintons sulking, like Achilles, in their tent. Otherwise, Troy will go Republican.
Dick Morris is a former adviser to President Clinton.
But, hey, we can go watch the Passion!
I see Mr. Morris is exercising his imagination again. *bump*
Yeah, like, "Slide over, W, and don't hog the covers."
No. Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
No, it was L.B.J. in 1968.
Nope, nope, I don't think so, because of all the lowlifes such as myself that would absolutely not let the public forget the baggage that the Hildebeast carries.
Having that pig on the ticket would be the best (or worst, depending on which side you're on) thing that happens.
Dick Morris is an idiot if he thinks that harpy is so universally "admired" that anyone can forget her past actions.
She has 40% of the nation as cool-aid drinkers who would vote for her no matter what. She would also get a greater percentage of the female vote from the swing voters than Bush. She would be an extremely dangerous addition to the Kerry ticket, dangerous for Bush.
On a more serious note, I can't believe that Kerry would be dumb enough to pick Hitlary to be his VP. If they were elected, he would be forever in her shadow, and that is assuming that he lives out his term. With Hitlary as VP, his life expectancy would be limited.
The offspring of the Satanic duo however is going to rear its ugly head in a few short years.
That is my prediction.
>>No, it was L.B.J. in 1968.
That's how I remember it. But Morris worked for Clinton, so the truth doesn't matter.
lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.