Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA Boss: Iraq Not Called Imminent Threat
Yahoo ^ | February, 5, 2004 | KATHERINE PFLEGER Associated Press writer

Posted on 02/05/2004 7:34:29 AM PST by Kaslin

WASHINGTON - In his first public defense of prewar intelligence, CIA (news - web sites) Director George Tenet said Thursday U.S. analysts never claimed before the war that Iraq (news - web sites) posed an imminent threat.

Tenet said analysts had varying opinions on the state of Iraq's chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs and those differences were spelled out in the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate given to the White House. That report summarized intelligence on Iraq's weapons programs.

Analysts "painted an objective assessment for our policy makers of a brutal dictator who was continuing his efforts to deceive and build programs that might constantly surprise us and threaten our interests, " he said in a speech at Georgetown University.

"No one told us what to say or how to say it," Tenet said.

He said that "in the intelligence business, you are never completely wrong or completely right ... When the facts of Iraq are all in, we will neither be completely right nor completely wrong."

He also noted that the search for banned weapons is continuing and "despite some public statements, we are nowhere near 85 percent finished. " That was a direct rebuttal to claims made by David Kay, Tenet's former top adviser in the weapons search.

Since Kay resigned two weeks ago, his statements that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s purported weapons didn't exist at the time of the U.S. invasion have sparked an intense debate over the prewar intelligence the Bush administration used to justify the war.

The failure to find weapons of mass destruction is turning into a major political issue ahead of the presidential election, calling into question the justification for the war as U.S. casualties mount. Republicans in Congress have increasingly been blaming poor intelligence and Tenet, who was originally appointed by President Clinton (news - web sites).

Democrats have said intelligence agencies deserved only part of the blame and have accused the White House of showcasing intelligence that bolstered the case for war, while ignoring dissenting opinions.

Bush was expected to announce another commission this week to review the intelligence community. At least five other inquiries into prewar intelligence are already under way.

The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., scheduled a meeting Thursday to study a 200-plus-page report compiled by committee staff on the prewar intelligence.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cia; georgetenet; imminentthreat; prewarintelligence; tenet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last
Neither did the president ever call it an imminent threat
1 posted on 02/05/2004 7:34:31 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
CIA Boss: Iraq Not Called Imminent Threat


Well, NOT ANYMORE!
2 posted on 02/05/2004 7:37:20 AM PST by JustPlainJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
And so the media spin begins.
3 posted on 02/05/2004 7:37:29 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
George Tenet memo to self:

CYA, ASAP

4 posted on 02/05/2004 7:37:39 AM PST by FBD (...Please press 2 for English...for Espanol, please stay on the line...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FBD
It was an excellent speech!
5 posted on 02/05/2004 7:38:41 AM PST by ConservativeMan55 (You...You sit down! You've had your say and now I'll have mine!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I notice they only focus on a very small part of the speech.
6 posted on 02/05/2004 7:39:20 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The former administration thought it was an imminent threat:

The Democrats' Case Against Saddam Hussein (Dems nailed, yet again)

Headline Rundown and links on Iraq - Things the democrats have conviently forgot...

Saddam Abused His Last Chance, Clinton -clear and present danger to safety of people everywhere 1998

Gore repeats that Saddam MUST GO - June 2000

What the democrats want you to forget

Iraq is a Regional Threat, capable of as much as 200 tons of VX nerve agent (1999 Clinton report)

Czech military reports say iraq has smallpox virus in weapons stockpile (and camelpox)

2/7/1998 : Arab media: Clinton will strike due to sex scandal (&links to tons of arab news on clinton)

Iraqi chemical weapons buildup reported (Sept 2001 Report)

Clinton, Gore rally domestic support for strike at Iraq, "unholy axis" (1998 Must read)

statement President Clinton from 1998 on the air strikes

Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 - Full Text, Sense of Congress - Remove Saddam

7 posted on 02/05/2004 7:41:17 AM PST by chance33_98 (Check out profile page for banners, if you need one freepmail me and I will make one for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Exactly, that has alsways been a figment of the Goebbelesque democrat party big lie.
8 posted on 02/05/2004 7:42:12 AM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FBD
I didn't think it sounded like CYA at all. You must have listened to another speech.
9 posted on 02/05/2004 7:45:19 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The former Director,on Fox ,Stanfield Turner(anti Bush) said we were told the weapons could be deployed in 45 minutes.That was a British claim and was an estimate of weapons in the field of operations,which,of course, they did not have,despite the belief by Iraqi Generals that the other Generals did.

Imminent threat and 45 minute deployment were not said by our administration.The dems lie.

It was a powerful speech..He says Kay is wrong .We are not 85% finished looking for WMD.
10 posted on 02/05/2004 7:45:52 AM PST by MEG33 (BUSH/CHENEY '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Quotable Quotes

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass >destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb,18, 1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi si tes) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass Destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of an elicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham - (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He hasignored the mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always under estimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda >members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

11 posted on 02/05/2004 7:47:09 AM PST by Attillathehon (Just got this story in my email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Neither did the president ever call it an imminent threat.

I think the President used words like "clear and gathering danger". Does anyone have the exact quote?

Do you think Russet, in his interview with President Bush on Sunday, will point that fact out? No!

12 posted on 02/05/2004 7:50:13 AM PST by CedarDave (Waiting too long to bail the boat greatly increases the chance of sinking [Bush campaign silence])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Imminent threat" is merely the pre-9/11 threshold for military action. It's just not relevant anymore.
13 posted on 02/05/2004 7:50:47 AM PST by Physicist (Sophie Rhiannon Sterner, born 1/19/2004: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1061267/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Neither did the president ever call it an imminent threat"

I get so mad when the media keeps saying President Bush said Saddam was an imminent threat.

If I recall correctly he said something to the effect are we to wait until Saddam becomes an imminent threat.

14 posted on 02/05/2004 7:53:02 AM PST by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attillathehon
for the Democrats, never let yesterday's facts get in the way of today's claims.
15 posted on 02/05/2004 7:55:31 AM PST by CedarDave (Waiting too long to bail the boat greatly increases the chance of sinking [Bush campaign silence])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The phrase the president used was GATHERING THREAT!

But then definitions aren't the liberal strong point.

16 posted on 02/05/2004 7:56:08 AM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Funny how the spin doctors here don't mention things he said in his speech like:

- The infrastructure and programs to make WMD.

- The missile program that they found the entire program complete with illegal missiles and the dealings with North Korea for missile technology.

- The techniques used to evaluate intel received from a hostile country.

If anyone gives me a single bit of lip about Tenant's speech, I'm going to tell them that if they didn't actually see the speech then they don't know what they are talking about.
17 posted on 02/05/2004 7:56:32 AM PST by CougarGA7 (It's only funny until someone gets hurt....then it's hilarious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPlainJoe
No one EVER called IRAQ an imminent THREAT .......NO ONE!!!! In fact..GW stated EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE!!

Has anyone found it amazing that the SAME people who are critizing the POTUS/ADMINISTRATION for stating WITH NEAR CERTAINTY that there were WMD in IRAQ are NOW STATING with the SAME CERTAINTY that there are NOT WMD????

Amazing considering the hunt is still on and the according to DCI is NOT yet nearly complete!!

18 posted on 02/05/2004 7:58:26 AM PST by PISANO (God Bless our Troops........They will not TIRE - They will not FALTER - They will not FAIL!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JustPlainJoe; gubamyster; Pro-Bush; FairOpinion; FITZ; moehoward; Nea Wood; Joe Hadenuf; sangoo; ...
Bush should 'never' have kept Tenet on! Too many things have gone wrong including 911 under his watch! Then the leaked memo! Now this. And on this one just with this title alone he is kicking the President in his heinie and leaving him out to dry.
19 posted on 02/05/2004 8:11:22 AM PST by JustPiper (D A M N I T O L Take 2 and the rest of the world can go to hell for up to 8 full hours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
That was a British claim

Ah, the British, the ones that plagiarized part of their dossier from a grad student's paper?
20 posted on 02/05/2004 8:14:41 AM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson