Howard? Is that you?
Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.
Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.
Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.
Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.
Will Bush defend the right to life? Check
Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check
Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check
Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.
Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.
Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.
Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.
Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.
Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.
Say no to the RATS!!
Did he take any action? These people are the ones who should get amnesty, not illegal aliens from Mexico.
Guess I was not CC'd on those...
The blood of brave Americans was spilled to give us, and to allow us to keep the right to vote.
Staying home in a snit because you don't personally like the policies of the better candidate, is IMO, diminishing the lives of those who died to give us that right.
You said that sarcastically, right? RIGHT?
FReepers, I'm done responding for the night. I do have a life outside FR, you know.
And let me add, sitting out the election also means you have no right to bitch and complain when you don't like policy or things don't go your way... because YOU CHOSE NOT TO BE HEARD WHEN IT MATTERED.
Complacency is the fastest road to extinction.
Howard? Is that you?
I think you are the one confused here. As I have said, even a Dem will have to work with the Reps to get a nominee passed. I don't trust Dubya not to cave in and nominate a swing vote candidate like O'Connor just to fill a SCOTUS position.
The GOP-controlled Congress increased the agency's funding to $122.5 million last year, up from $115.7 million. That's still well below the $175 million it received in 1992.
Yep. All conservatives are not Republicans, and all Republicans are not conservative, according to the 'real' conservatives- whoever they are.
Sorry .. But I disgress
I never said it was about me. Honestly, I don't understand why you seem more interested in fighting than in carrying on a reasonable conversation.
You troll this thread like your the nanny police. All anyone has to do is read your comments on this thread alone to see that you consider yourself in charge of policing everyone else's thoughts and comments.
The Lead Moderator has been going around encouraging folks to self police threads in search of a greater level of civility. That's all I'm attempting here - if you disagree with that policy perhaps you should address your concerns to the mod.
I have pinged three who can attest to your ugliness.
PKM - are you attesting to my ugliness?
At what cost in blood and treasure? Do you understand how absurd this statement is?
It's meant to poke a little fun at the people who are a little too seduced by the Cult of Personality.
If it makes them check their motives, that's good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.