VANITY: The best way to keep America a sovereign free nation is to keep the Democrats out of power!

Free Republic

[Jim Robinson]

Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.

Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.

Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.

Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.

Will Bush defend the right to life? Check

Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check

Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check

Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.

Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.

Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.

Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.

Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.

Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.

Say no to the RATS!!

[Kevin Curry]

A Democrat president wouldn't be able to crowbar half the loony leftist crap through a Republican-controlled Congress that Bush has been able to heave over the fence. A conservative president and a Repubican-controlled Congress is the right remedy for what ails us. If in this election our current president should forfeit his office by playing too loose in a mad gamble to win the support of the left, the next best remedy is to add to the Republican strength in Congress. A Kerry administration would go down in history rivalling the Buchanan, Grant, and Harding administrations for sheer uselnessness and futility.

I do not share the popular sentiment of the posters here who meekly give Bush a pass on whatever he wants to do out of pusillanimous fear of the Democrats.

Conservatives should be made of sterner stuff.

[Mo1]

BTW I don't think all those leaks you write of really led to more socialism in the US.

Hmmm blocking judges so the Dems could push their agenda didn't lead to more socialism?

And I do believe we tried the filibuster .. but without 60, we aren't going to get the important things passed

[livius]

Agreed! Thanks JR. I don't agree with Bush 100%, but I don't agree with anybody 100%.

I think there are things open to discussion in his plans.

But Bush is definitely our hope at the moment. Conservatives who say they are not going to vote for Bush because they don't agree 100% are going to make sure that a Dem is elected. But that may not bother them - one poster ticked off by the immigration plan (who of course offered no constructive suggestions) actually wanted a Tancredo/Kucinich ticket, because she said they agree on that issue. They probably do. In other words, extremes meet.

I have been very worried that FR was being used as an anti-Bush tool by Dem infiltrators, based on the hate-filled and irrational tone of recent (supposedly conservative) postings I have read here. Thanks for correcting things.

[Beck_isright]

" I cannot vote for a liberal whatever his party label happens to be."

Can I use that as my tag line? That is an excellent replacement for what I'm saying now. You hit a home run there Laz...

[goodnesswins]

"We're in the minority, Jim. But 3rd parties were supposedly in the minority in 2000, too - and we all know what happened then."

YOU have got to be KIDDING ME.....you're PROUD of being a Third Party Spoiler....we almost got Gored, and YOU ARE PROUD OF IT?

[MEG33]

I fear you have yet to understand the advise and consent part of judge nominations.The dems broke tradition by not allowing a vote in the full senate on nominees that were approved by the committee.It takes 60 votes to overcome this ploy.We don't have 60 votes.

[ohioWfan]

OK. Missed the 'shorthand.' Sorry.

I didn't figure you'd do that anyway......which is why I said, "THEN......"

Although, I have serious problems with leaving a blank and risking one of these RATS' getting into the WH.

It's certainly not a risk I'd want to take as a Conservative, no matter how vehemently I opposed some of the President's policies.

[Nanodik]

You are not taking into account the Biased liberal media.

Reagan managed to work around this, and he did not have Fox, Drudge, Rush, et al. to help him out. Like I said, if they are unwilling to lead then they should get out of the way and let someone who is willing to take over.

[Ophiucus]

Has anyone besides me noticed how SHORT these pro-Bush threads are?

There's only so many ways to say "agreed." Then, the anti-Bush attacks are predictable and repeatative so the digression there gets pretty boring.

[You Dirty Rats]

You make a lot of good and sensible points. There is nothing disloyal or improper about speaking out against policies that one doesn't agree with.

Grass roots -- the President can't position himself too far from the center of the country politically if he is to win. Just look at the Senate & House -- closely divided.

What we all need to do is keep trying to move more citizens to the Right -- which will elect more Republicans and more conservatives -- and that in turn moves the Presidency to the Right.

But to drop out altogether or support a 'Rat -- that just doesn't help. And 3rd parties -- come ON, there aren't any third parties with any Congressmen or any other power in this country, and that won't change.

[Salvation]

Bumping!

[NittanyLion]

You do not tell me a damn thing.

Okay...just trying to offer you a bit of advice, no need to get ugly.

You do little else besides stalk and bait.

Is that right? That's a pretty serious allegation - can you provide some evidence?

It's obvious you never have a happy day. Pathetic.

Actually, I'm quite happy. I have a great wife, a job I enjoy that pays well, I wonderful family...my life couldn't be better at the moment. Thanks for asking, though.

[Brasil]

YYEEEEEEEEAAAAAHHHHH!!!!

[b9]

Have you seen this wonderful thread?

[You Dirty Rats]

If you don't support the Republican nominee, then you, sir, are the real RINO.

[Jim Robinson]

I sincerely doubt he has a real problem with his base. It's obvious that a lot of conservatives are ticked off (and for good reason), but I don't think it will equate to "millions" of conservatives voting Democrat or third party or not voting at all. When push comes to shove there will be very few in the conservative "base" who will actually reject Bush (or the Republicans) in favor of returning power to the Democrats. That'd be political suicide.

[Nanodik]

I fear you have yet to understand the advise and consent part of judge nominations.

What don't I understand? It takes 60 votes to force cloture to any bill and force a vote in the Senate, not just judicial nominees.

[Lazamataz]

Can I use that as my tag line?

Of course.

[Salvation]

Don't forget the felons!

[gatorbait]

Thanks Jim.It is nice to know you are, in addition to the owner ,as well as leader of this site, also a clear eyed realist in this world of sudden terror and and cowardly attacks upon freedom.. in all it means. Let's roll.. we have a war to win and a Nation to keep as a beacon for all that is right in human history.At risk of sounding corny, it is our mission from God.