Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/23/2004 11:58:58 AM PST by A_Niceguy_in_CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
When is the last possible date for Hitlery to register to run? Has it passed?
2 posted on 01/23/2004 12:12:41 PM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Bush wins Florida, Texas, Penn & much of the South & smaller states.

The Dem wins California, New York, Illinois(?), Mass & some other NE states.

Battlegound states = Ohio, Michigan & West Virginia where the ecomomy continues to spiral downward. OH & MI both full of electoral votes.

3 posted on 01/23/2004 12:12:51 PM PST by gdani (Have you played Atari today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
it's the trend lines that are key in politics, said Charlie Black, a veteran GOP strategist and former chairman of the Republican National Committee. Still, Black said, there are reasons for Republicans not to be overconfident this January.

"I'd rather be in our shoes than theirs, but it's also true that the country's very closely divided on a party basis, and if both sides consolidate their bases, it's going to be a close race," he said. "The president has an advantage, but it's not a huge advantage."

...

In fact, the economy has lost about 2.3 million jobs under Bush, the worst job creation record of any president since Herbert Hoover.

Bush is ticking off his base on two fronts: 1) out-of-control deficit spending; and 2) a radical amnesty plan to legalize millions of illegal immigrants and to hugely increase immigration levels. It makes me ill that Bush is proposing the latter when millions of Americans have lost their jobs.

If Bush and Rove think that they will win this November in a walk anyway, I guess they won't lose any sleep over the disaffection of many in the Republican base.

But if Black is being serious, and the 2004 election is expected to be a cliff-hanger like 2000 was, Bush had better think long and hard about the problems his spending and amnesty plan are causing among people who would otherwise consider him the obvious choice in an election against a Democrat.

5 posted on 01/23/2004 12:13:59 PM PST by Map Kernow ("I hold that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
The first Bush's recession also lasted eight months and officially ended in March 1991, well before the election year. But unemployment didn't peak until 15 months later, and the recession's end wasn't announced until December 1992.

The recession on Bush I's watch ended 18 months before the election in 1992, but the media (and Bush I) allowed Clinton to get away "it's the economy, stupid!" and "this is the worst economy since the great depression!"

Bush I surrounded himself with negative people (Dick Darman) too willing to accept the Demo view of the world. Bush I was also the antithesis of a "visionary" -- I really feel he was happy to see the end of his presidency. Clinton didn't win; Bush was fired.

This George W. Bush is a visionary and a man of much more principle than his father -- his father would have been pushed around by a Paul O'Neil. GWB put his programs on the table when he ran against the boob, Gore, and he has the temerity to push for the passage of that program in the 4 years that followed. Who knew he would inherit the biggest market meltdown since the great depression, and the most severe corporate scandals in recent history, and a pretty severe recession, and the terrorist attacks on 9-11-01? Thank Bill Clinton for all those challenges... all those cans kicked down the road... Bill Clinton's famous "Bridge to the 21st Century"!

11 posted on 01/23/2004 12:36:59 PM PST by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
The only thing that will save Bush now is the capture of Osama.
The Dems will turn-out and vote for anyone of the dwarves, such is their hatred of Bush.
24 posted on 01/23/2004 12:59:57 PM PST by CMClay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
turn out turn out turn out
37 posted on 01/23/2004 1:36:02 PM PST by eyespysomething (Another American optimist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
It seems to me that in January and February of 1991, GHWB was enjoying 80 - 90% polling numbers because of the success of Desert Storm.
40 posted on 01/23/2004 3:09:32 PM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
GWB's re-election outlook is sunnier mainly because his father didn't want to be re-elected.
45 posted on 01/24/2004 1:49:48 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (If white wine goes with fish, do white grapes go with sushi?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA; onyx; Howlin; Tamsey
Saddam underestimated Bush, and any one of his political opponents will make the same mistake. :)
67 posted on 01/24/2004 7:58:57 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (All Our Base Are Belong To Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson