Skip to comments.Democrats: The PC Anti-White Party
Posted on 01/22/2004 10:17:43 AM PST by presidio9
Last week a long lost friend emailed me after coming across several of my internet columns. He said, It sounds like youve become a Republican and then nothing else. It took me a while to realize that he meant it as an insult because, in many parts of the country, the word Republican is a pejorative by itself.
I told him that not just I, but he, and every white person in the country should join the Grand Old Party, or, at the very least, resign their Democratic Party membership as soon as they can.
I often overlook the fact that I am descended from liberals. My parents and just about everyone I knew growing up voted Democrat. The same was true about the people I associated with in college. My father was a good man and an old school liberal but he made the mistake of thinking government spending correlates with helping people. He was wrong, but I am confident that if he were alive today and could hear the way in which the Democrats pander exclusively to their militant left wing, he would melt his party card.
Just to participate in the ranks of the donkeyites, you have to automatically embrace multiculturalism and diversity as your secondary religions. Many liberals have made the pursuit of diversity a replacement for religion as religion mandates judging yourself and others. To them judgment is as outdated a concept as property owners alone voting.
I can not bear to be around this crowd and they cannot bear to be around me as the all cultures are valuable except the west outlook runs contrary to the realities of the life on this planet. I have hated political correctness from the first moment it corrected me, but it took several years to realize that this anti-American, anti-male, anti-Caucasian plague originates from the left. I finally recognized that liberalism and PC are forever intertwined. I will have nothing to do with them and neither should you.
Luckily, others are slowly recognizing this as well. Voting trends illustrate that white men are beginning to see that the Democratic Party exists only to marginalize them: In 2000, however, Al Gore lost too much white support to sustain this delicate coalition. George W. Bush beat him by 12 points among whites generally and by 24 points among white men. [Jason Riley, Opinionjournal.com, January 13, 2004]
Thats great news and I hope that the divide in white voters becomes even greater in 2004. Hopefully, therell be more scenes like at the 2000 Democratic Party convention, when a female Senator stood up and received a huge ovation for bemoaning the low overall number of female senators. Why would they equate gender with how one performed as a senator? They do this because, on the left, it is widely assumed that women are a fount of goodness in the world and men are a source of evil.
Yes friends, stupid and repugnant ideas never die, they just fade away into the Democratic Party platform.
These minority worshipping aristocrats care more about chromosomes and skin color than they do in representing the American people on the whole. The other day, Wesley Clark stated that, if elected, he would provide yet more goodies for Native Americans. Who would this come at the expense of? Everybody else.
Howard Dean, in the last debate, stated that altering the flawed racial consciousness of white Americans was the way in which to improve race relations. Ah, its all our fault. Personally, I think getting whites to stop obsessing and deferring over the subject of race is the way to improve racial relations. Start acting youll like not morally inferior and soon well no longer be expected to apologize for things weve never done.
The real source of racism is people like Dean. Hes willing to evaluate the worth of citizens based on external characteristics alone. We should be grateful that Al Sharpton was there the other night to illustrate to the frontrunner that those who sleep with dogs really do get fleas.
Apparently, Dean is not enough of a racial apologist for some of the other candidates. Sharpton argued, It seems as though you discovered blacks and browns during this campaign. Meaning, that he didnt spend enough time obsessing about whether his cabinet, in a state with a black population of less than one, had enough diversity in it.
Arent these fireworks merely an attempt to cover up the fact that this party has no new ideas with which to impress the electorate?
While its nice to see Sharpton attack Dean, he could not be more wrong about their soon-to-be leader. Memorizing racial hierarchies is a prerequisite to obtaining a Democratic Party identification card. He could never have got as far as he has if he didnt.
When General Clark obtained his official membership papers last year, Im sure he had to repeat five times I am a privileged white patriarch while clicking the heels of his red shoes before theyd let him take part in the primaries.
The irony about the Democratic minority fetish is that none of their policies actually benefit minorities. The only groups who profit (and I mean profit in the economic sense) are the teachers unions, trial lawyers and government employees.
The liberals dont even bolster those unions who tirelessly campaign for them in Iowa and everywhere else polls exist. What Democratic initiatives help Americas blue-collar workers? Increasing taxes? Putting social security in a lockbox and thereby not fixing the problem? When they advocate for the unmitigated flow of immigrants through our borders it only harms indigenous workers. Unfettered immigration cannot help them, but none of this prevents forty percent of the population from voting D when its election time.
Its even sadder that so many black Americans in particular pledge their eternal support to this party of race hustlers and shysters. While its true that Howard Dean might get 90 percent of their vote, a Dean presidency would only hurt this predominantly middle class subgroup of Americans.
Blacks are making it in this country and should be proud of the way they have prospered, but Democratic politicians deny their success the same way Marxist professors deny that the Soviet Union was an example of their theories being put into practice. I think it was Jay Nordlinger who once said that for liberals its always the Jim Crow era and the locations always Selma, Alabama.
To the Democrats, some Americans will forever be more equal than others. People like me, under their reign, are destined for the back of the civil rights and employment bus. My advice to all Caucasians is that only if youre a masochist should you consider voting for this race-monger chain gang. Its time that everyone gets off the plantation. Lets hope these racists get pummeled in 2004.
The dem control over blacks is so strong and irrational that very few blacks realize how little they get and how productive it would be for all blacks to put their political clout into play. But, they just shuffle up to the dem boss man and wait to be told what to do. In 2004, 90 to 96 % of the black vote will go to dems. That will be proof of collective stupidity.
I prefer the term "obliterated." I pray, deeply, to see the Donkey Party crumble, then disappear in my lifetime.
To my everlasting shame, I pulled the lever for Bill Clinton in 1992. I was a little queazy about it, and Clinton did nothing over the next eight years to bring me back.
A very common perception in people from the New Deal/depression era.
As a lot of old Southern Democrats have done.
Bingo!! Rats have treated minorities much like a pets. They feed them a few scraps and expect for them to show loyality while playing fetch.
You mean you never got your middle class tax cut from the New Democrat. -Tom
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.