Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^ | 1/22/04

Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar

ED. NOTE: On Tuesday evening, January 20, 2004, the President of the United States gave one of the most conservative State of the Union addresses in at least a generation. For a SOTU speech, it had a remarkably short spending wish list. Instead, it had passages such as those excerpted below — none of which would have been spoken by a Democrat or liberal (i.e., Leftist), or even a "RINO." Check it out:

[BEGIN EXCERPTS: Bold/underscore emphasis by Wolfstar]

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 — over two years without an attack on American soil. And it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting — and false.

[SNIP]

The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day and conducting an average of 180 raids a week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime.

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime's weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons.

[SNIP]

Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror.

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.

[SNIP]

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands — (applause) — Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for our operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every human heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again.

[SNIP]

In the last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger.

You have doubled the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years; new home construction, the highest in almost 20 years; home ownership rates, the highest ever. Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high, and jobs are on the rise.

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have — and you were right to return it.

[SNIP]

We're requiring higher standards [in schools]. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing.

[SNIP]

We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda. Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act — (applause) — unless you act — unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged $300 more in federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase. What Congress has given, the Congress should not take away. For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent.

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits.

Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run — so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy.

My administration is promoting free and fair trade to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers and farmers — to create jobs for American workers. Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people.

[SNIP]

In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent. This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.

Tonight, I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy.

[SNIP]

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

[ED. NOTE: The precedent for guest worker programs goes back at least to the Eisenhower administration.]

[SNIP]

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about $35, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best — just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses in a health savings account.

[SNIP]

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs.

[SNIP]

Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance. I urge you to pass association health plans. I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance.

[SNIP]

To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes.

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America's health care the best in the world.

[SNIP]

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement. Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the last two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001.

[SNIP]

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

[SNIP]

It's also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America's religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country — mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups, just because they have a cross or a Star of David or a crescent on the wall. By executive order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again.

[SNIP]

The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable — and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

[END EXCERPTS]


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushamnesty; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: looscnnn
Two terms of a liberal Adm. and we will have a losing nat. debate over our military being controlled by the U.N. and the enactment of laws in consideration of the E.U. This election will set the road we are to go down. Think a little, is this the road you want to follow?
461 posted on 01/22/2004 9:15:58 AM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Hey exmarine:

Check my posts, and you'll see that you may have forgotten to engage your irony compensator-----

best,

Charlotte

462 posted on 01/22/2004 9:15:58 AM PST by Charlotte Corday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
I have no clue what you are talking about. Even though you posted it twice.

Go bait somebody else.
463 posted on 01/22/2004 9:16:08 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: mdefranc
I would like to add to what others have written that George W. Bush has advocated drilling in ANWR more than any other President and I believe that he may eventually get it done. He also has touched the third rail in politics and is pushing the Social Security Private Accounts button very hard. Bush is a conservative. He isn't a perfect conservative but he is a conservative. The difference between what he wishes to enact and propose and what John Kerry wants is night and day. The choice could not clearer or easier. Those who vote for some third, fourth or fifth party are cutting off their noses to spite their faces.

464 posted on 01/22/2004 9:16:43 AM PST by GmbyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
Wow! The Bushbots really jumped you. You are correct. He is failing the American people in so many ways he doesn't deserve to be reelected.
465 posted on 01/22/2004 9:16:44 AM PST by novacation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; Wolfstar
Thanks PKM, Wolfstar! Bump!
466 posted on 01/22/2004 9:16:56 AM PST by Jen (The FReeperette formerly known as AntiJen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
"Today's Republicans not only like Bush personally, they also overwhelmingly support his policies."

Big statement, backed up by TWO examples, both slam dunks.

" According to a Pew Center study, 85 percent of Republicans support the war in Iraq, 82 percent believe that preemptive war is justified, and 72 percent believe the United States is justified in holding terror suspects without trial."

Those two slam dunks aside, the article doesn't prove what he said, much less what the poster said.

It's a fairy tale.

467 posted on 01/22/2004 9:16:58 AM PST by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
I don't think you'd want to go toe to toe on morality with many of the pro-Bush people on this forum, marine. I don't think you'd win.........

hahaha. Do you think this is some sort of contest? Battle of prideful people perhaps? Let me frame it for you: THE FUTURE OF AMERICA IS AT STAKE. SOCIALISM = SLAVERY.

468 posted on 01/22/2004 9:17:11 AM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Wow, it had a different title when it was posted on FR; what's up with that?
469 posted on 01/22/2004 9:17:55 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: deport
Keep things in some perspective...... Sharpe can vote for CP till the cows come home and not make a bit of difference here in TX.

True .. it's the BS from the CP and how they think we need to put another Dem in the WH to teach republicans a lesson that bothers me

I don't like playing games with my life, your life and the lives of our children

If I wanted to commit suicide, I'd step in front of a bus instead of putting a dem in the WH where everyone else would have to pay the price

470 posted on 01/22/2004 9:18:28 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
I can't understand some of the people here. They say we are a very small minority, but then they start with the "Danger Will Robinson. Danger." "it is your fault that Bush will loose the election". Are we maybe a bigger group than we realize?
471 posted on 01/22/2004 9:19:31 AM PST by looscnnn ("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: looscnnn
After all, wouldn't more muslims be mad that he got reelected and would join up?

No... because you have mistaken why muslims are joining up in the first place.

472 posted on 01/22/2004 9:20:13 AM PST by carton253 (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States and war is what they got! (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Are you suggesting you make moral decisions when voting and I do not?
473 posted on 01/22/2004 9:20:13 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I can't fathom seeing any of the liberal Democrat candidates --- Kerry, Dean, Edwards, Clark or Hillary --- sitting in the Oval Office attempting to prosecute the WoT.

Thanks for posting -- very well stated. This paragraph is the one that really stands out to me -- thinking of any of those four in the White House sends chills up and down my spine. Also why I will spend every available moment to support the reelection campaign. To me the WOT is the most important issue of the campaign.

474 posted on 01/22/2004 9:20:22 AM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
Those two slam dunks aside, the article doesn't prove what he said, much less what the poster said. It's a fairy tale.

It proves EXACTLY what I said.

And your reply proves you're a dishonest poster who only wants the issue.

Face it; 91 percent of US approve of Bush.

475 posted on 01/22/2004 9:20:25 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Of course he is.
476 posted on 01/22/2004 9:20:49 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar; mdefranc; steve50; Bikers4Bush; looscnnn; RiflemanSharpe; Lurker; Pern; Blzbba; All
Let me just add some HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE:

"Conservative purists" excoriated President Reagan just as they now excoriate President Bush.

Many of these "purists" deserted President Reagan in the second and third year of his first term when he both increased spending/deficits (to the HIGHEST levels EVER as % of GDP) and rescinded many of the tax cuts that he had passed just the year before! President Reagan's approval ratings plummeted to the 30s/40s, not to recover until the 4th year of his first-term when 'perceptible' economic growth occurred just in time to secure the President's re-election.

In his second term, President Reagan again experienced the rath of "conservative purists" when he "softened" his policies relative to the Soviet Union (read withdrawing missiles from Europe). This "softening" coincided with a blanket amnesty for illegal immigrants, a mild recession and the Iran-Contra controversy. Needless to say, the President's approval ratings again plummeted and really didn't recover until he left office -- at which time, the disaffected "purists" began to 're-write' their perceptions of the Reagan presidency. In particular, they decided to retrospectively applaud President Reagan for DOING WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS RIGHT, NOT WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS POLITICALLY OR IDEOLOGICALLY EXPEDIENT! [Can anyone spell H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-S-Y?!]

[Of course, the re-writers did NOT include Reagan's OMB Director or his Secretary of the Treasury (during his first term), both of whom wrote devastating critiques of both the President and his economic policies! "Conservative purists" can be brutal -- even to their supposed heroes!]

477 posted on 01/22/2004 9:20:50 AM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic Rocker
Was I taken aback by GWB and his policy...Yes! But on second look I see a man putting his arms around an issue that everyone else was afraid to do...AND LOOK WHERE THAT GOT US....DITTO IRAQ! By bringing this issue to the forefront...GWB has invoked us all to speak and we will be heard..ALL OF THIS SO FAR IS JUST AN OUTLINE!

Well, true enough.

Given his miserable appeal to blacks and Hispanics in 2000, GWB is actually destroying the future of the GOP by bringing new Dims into the country. The Rovian fantasy of bringing Hispanics into the GOP will simply never work; we can never outbid the Dims with certain minority groups.

Even if he gets his don't-call-it-amnesty program through, Bush won't improve his standing with Hispanics. But even more of them will be voting for Dims.

How can you deny it, living in California for so long? You've seen it there already. Now it will spread everywhere else.
478 posted on 01/22/2004 9:21:22 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: zook
If you think you're a conservative, but at the same time you want Bush to lose, and thereby allow a Democrat to win, then you're indeed something like a wingnut and really ought to find another forum.

I don't want Bush to lose, I want a man who will act on true conservative values, and he hasn't been doing it. As I said, I like Bush personally, but I can't accept his policies - they are detrimental to a free country. Socialism is a cancer that leads to slavery, and his immigration proposal is an abomination. And I will speak in this forum as long as I like - this forum isn't called "communist dictatorship", it's called "free republic." I don't think it matters what rational arguments are presented - people like you just hate the fact that there are conservatives who vote on principle not party. Get used to it - it's a reality.

479 posted on 01/22/2004 9:21:43 AM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I can't fathom seeing any of the liberal Democrat candidates --- Kerry, Dean, Edwards, Clark or Hillary --- sitting in the Oval Office attempting to prosecute the WoT.

That part is enough for me........LOL.

480 posted on 01/22/2004 9:21:55 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 2,001-2,015 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson