Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^ | 1/22/04

Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar

ED. NOTE: On Tuesday evening, January 20, 2004, the President of the United States gave one of the most conservative State of the Union addresses in at least a generation. For a SOTU speech, it had a remarkably short spending wish list. Instead, it had passages such as those excerpted below — none of which would have been spoken by a Democrat or liberal (i.e., Leftist), or even a "RINO." Check it out:

[BEGIN EXCERPTS: Bold/underscore emphasis by Wolfstar]

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 — over two years without an attack on American soil. And it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting — and false.

[SNIP]

The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day and conducting an average of 180 raids a week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime.

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime's weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons.

[SNIP]

Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror.

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.

[SNIP]

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands — (applause) — Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for our operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every human heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again.

[SNIP]

In the last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger.

You have doubled the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years; new home construction, the highest in almost 20 years; home ownership rates, the highest ever. Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high, and jobs are on the rise.

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have — and you were right to return it.

[SNIP]

We're requiring higher standards [in schools]. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing.

[SNIP]

We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda. Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act — (applause) — unless you act — unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged $300 more in federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase. What Congress has given, the Congress should not take away. For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent.

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits.

Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run — so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy.

My administration is promoting free and fair trade to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers and farmers — to create jobs for American workers. Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people.

[SNIP]

In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent. This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.

Tonight, I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy.

[SNIP]

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

[ED. NOTE: The precedent for guest worker programs goes back at least to the Eisenhower administration.]

[SNIP]

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about $35, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best — just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses in a health savings account.

[SNIP]

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs.

[SNIP]

Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance. I urge you to pass association health plans. I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance.

[SNIP]

To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes.

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America's health care the best in the world.

[SNIP]

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement. Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the last two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001.

[SNIP]

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

[SNIP]

It's also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America's religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country — mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups, just because they have a cross or a Star of David or a crescent on the wall. By executive order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again.

[SNIP]

The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable — and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

[END EXCERPTS]


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushamnesty; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: Howlin; Charlotte Corday
I see...so anyone who stands firm on moral principle is a "wingnut" huh? So, ALL OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS WERE WINGNUTS. Thank you Charlotte Corday for your brilliant insight.
441 posted on 01/22/2004 9:11:13 AM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
This post does not single out any one poster, but is meant for. I have been a lurker for a few years, and watched the positive and negative support for our President. Too often, I've seen posters react to something the media has put, and then having to retract their angry rhetoric when the truth came out. You say he's screwing the conservatives, but what would you have him do, knowing that if he appeals to just his conservative base, he loses. Folks, the Democrats want much more, and if they gain control, what then, back to whining like was done when Clinton was in office? Some say they could live with a Dem president and the House and Senate controlled by the Reps. This would be madness, WE HAVE CONTROL OF THE HOUSE, SENATE, AND THE PRESIDENCY, and we still can't get what we want. Thank God we have gotten some of the things, lower taxes, a secure country protected by a military re-energized by this President. You cry about the amnesty bill, give him some credit for at least proposing a solution, not the blanket amnesty with no controls that the Dems want. You talk about gun control,who wants that the most, seems like it's a Dem name on the proposed bill. We can all sit back and bitch and second guess, and my second guess is to go after our voice in the House and Senate, thats the power brokers, get rid of the Specters, Jeffords, Schummers, et all, and give the President something to work with.Get judges that will follow the Constitution. In the meantime, remember we have a President that doesn't attack the other side, but reacts to what he feels the people need. He may be wrong, but by God, he did something. Semper Fi
442 posted on 01/22/2004 9:11:22 AM PST by gunner03 (just another grunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: onyx

RE-ELECT OUR PRESIDENT BUSH

443 posted on 01/22/2004 9:11:22 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Charlotte Corday
I see...so anyone who stands firm on moral principle is a "wingnut" huh? So, ALL OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS WERE WINGNUTS. Thank you Charlotte Corday for your brilliant insight.
444 posted on 01/22/2004 9:12:01 AM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: CSM
Proof that he is a Liberal Republican. Domestically liberal, while strong on defense. The democrats should love him.

Along with the FDR/LBJ wing of the republican party.

445 posted on 01/22/2004 9:12:14 AM PST by steve50 ("There is Tranquility in Ignorance, but Servitude is its Partner.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: skip2myloo
Can I ask... what civil liberties have you personally lost with the Patriot Act?

I would be interested in an answer.

446 posted on 01/22/2004 9:12:44 AM PST by carton253 (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States and war is what they got! (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
I knew Perot, the love of my life worked with Perot years ago.You voted for a man unfit to serve as President.
447 posted on 01/22/2004 9:13:01 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
See, that is one of the problems with the country, we are letting groups like the ACLU, Rainblow/Push, etc. run the country. Who cares if they don't like it, they don't like the Ten Commandments in schools, courts, etc.
448 posted on 01/22/2004 9:13:29 AM PST by looscnnn ("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: gunner03
Some say they could live with a Dem president and the House and Senate controlled by the Reps. This would be madness, WE HAVE CONTROL OF THE HOUSE, SENATE, AND THE PRESIDENCY, and we still can't get what we want.

The GOP Congress seems to have opposed Clinton's liberal plans more than it opposes Bush's liberal plans.

449 posted on 01/22/2004 9:14:01 AM PST by Land of the Free 04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
People can argue all they want on the topic of whether PresBush is a conservative or not and exactly how much of a conservative he really is, but the fact remains there will be only one winner on election day in November. It will either be the Democratic Party candidate or the Republican Party candidate. That means voters will most likely choose between Kerry, Dean, Clark, Edwards, maybe Hillary and President Bush. In my book Bush is the best choice and frankly the only choice. I think GWBush is an instinctive conservative. He hasn't controlled federal spending to my satisfaction and his recent immigration reform proposals are deadwrong, but when I view the alternative choices, there's no doubt in my mind who gets my vote on election day 2004.

Since he took office, PresBush has handled the aftermath of the 9-11 attacks with courage, determination and moral clarity. He has taken the fight to the terrorists in their own homeland and he has waged war in the name of freedom and liberty. The President has strengethened our security at home and given law enforcement the tools to locate and fight terrorists here in America. The President has done a remarkable job in the War on Terrorism and he deserves the support of all American's.

I can't fathom seeing any of the liberal Democrat candidates --- Kerry, Dean, Edwards, Clark or Hillary --- sitting in the Oval Office attempting to prosecute the WoT.

President Bush deserves another term in office.

450 posted on 01/22/2004 9:14:06 AM PST by Reagan Man (The choice is clear. Reelect BUSH-CHENEY in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Hey Howlin, you're exactly right too. What I think that you, and Dane, and Miss Marple, and the rest of YOUR crowd oughta do, is when you see a post from me or the rest of MY crowd, is remember that we're just a tiny pimple on the backside of that enormous middle-of-the-road America, and relax a bit.

And like I said above, there are a bunch of Republicans I could and would vote for. It's just that GWB is off that list. (CFR did it for me)

451 posted on 01/22/2004 9:14:06 AM PST by Charlotte Corday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
Oh, I was wrong: it was Gallup.

Read it and weep:

The first result is that the Republican Party is more unified than ever before. Ninety-one percent of Republicans approve of the job President Bush is doing. In 1992, Bush's father didn't have anything like that level of support, and even the Reagan administration was split between so-called pragmatists and ideologues.

Today's Republicans not only like Bush personally, they also overwhelmingly support his policies. According to a Pew Center study, 85 percent of Republicans support the war in Iraq, 82 percent believe that pre-emptive war is justified, and 72 percent believe the U.S. is justified in holding terror suspects without trial.

From this article in the New York Times: The Bush Democrats

And since your reply to me sounded a lot bit like you were accusing me of making it up -- and so I'll know you know -- I make it a habit not to post things I can't back up.

452 posted on 01/22/2004 9:14:28 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
He is still not a RINO -- that should be reserved for people in Congress that vote with the Democrats on topics such as partial birth abortion and against Tax Cuts -- two extremely important issues to Conservative Republicans.

RINO is a real hot button with me since I was on the receiving end of that on here recently and it really bugged me to no end since I am a lifelong Republican going back to before I could vote when I rang doorbells for Goldwater as a Teenage Republican.
453 posted on 01/22/2004 9:14:29 AM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
If you think you're a conservative, but at the same time you want Bush to lose, and thereby allow a Democrat to win, then you're indeed something like a wingnut and really ought to find another forum.
454 posted on 01/22/2004 9:14:29 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
It has been suggested that use of the terms bushbot or bushbasher be suspended.It tends to inflame rather than inform.
455 posted on 01/22/2004 9:15:21 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
"I could care less that anyone is scared, my vote doesn't hinge on striking fear it hinges on someone doing the right damn thing for a change and so far I'm seeing less of the right thing being done and more of the wrong thing."

......yes, I hear the logic of what you're saying....but the "right" thing, according to you is the "wrong" thing, according to someone else.

I look at it like this.....there are some things that GWB has disappointed me on, but by and large, he is an honorable man who sincerely wishes to put this country back in "conservative" order........god forbid we give it up to liberals to trash for 4 or 8 more years.......then what??????...Hillary is ready to have her fat-ass manipulated into the office????? No freeking thank you!!!!

456 posted on 01/22/2004 9:15:24 AM PST by soozla (LIBERALS are the suckiest bunch of suckers that ever sucked!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
There you go again, imagining that you are the only moral person on FR.

I don't think you'd want to go toe to toe on morality with many of the pro-Bush people on this forum, marine. I don't think you'd win.........

457 posted on 01/22/2004 9:15:42 AM PST by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
I knew Perot, the love of my life worked with Perot years ago.You voted for a man unfit to serve as President.

My point stands - Dole lost because he didn't excite many conservatives - wishy washy at best. What you Bush supporters just can't get thru your heads is that there are a good number of conservatives who hold to moral principle and not Party.

458 posted on 01/22/2004 9:15:43 AM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
You mean, only Bushbots need apply?

Just come out and say it. Any other position is considered illegitimate by most of you.

Attmepts to defame and defeat President Bush are illegitimate, unless you are democrat!

Debates and discussions on policy is one thing, bash Bush is quite another. That's falls into the democrats' realm.

Election '04 just may be the most important election in our lifetime.

459 posted on 01/22/2004 9:15:51 AM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
If it were the will of the people, it would happen. But of course some people like yourself are happy with the status quo. Why is that, because you are told to?
460 posted on 01/22/2004 9:15:53 AM PST by looscnnn ("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 2,001-2,015 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson