Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^ | 1/22/04

Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar

ED. NOTE: On Tuesday evening, January 20, 2004, the President of the United States gave one of the most conservative State of the Union addresses in at least a generation. For a SOTU speech, it had a remarkably short spending wish list. Instead, it had passages such as those excerpted below — none of which would have been spoken by a Democrat or liberal (i.e., Leftist), or even a "RINO." Check it out:

[BEGIN EXCERPTS: Bold/underscore emphasis by Wolfstar]

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 — over two years without an attack on American soil. And it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting — and false.

[SNIP]

The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day and conducting an average of 180 raids a week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime.

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime's weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons.

[SNIP]

Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror.

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.

[SNIP]

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands — (applause) — Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for our operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every human heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again.

[SNIP]

In the last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger.

You have doubled the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years; new home construction, the highest in almost 20 years; home ownership rates, the highest ever. Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high, and jobs are on the rise.

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have — and you were right to return it.

[SNIP]

We're requiring higher standards [in schools]. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing.

[SNIP]

We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda. Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act — (applause) — unless you act — unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged $300 more in federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase. What Congress has given, the Congress should not take away. For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent.

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits.

Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run — so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy.

My administration is promoting free and fair trade to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers and farmers — to create jobs for American workers. Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people.

[SNIP]

In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent. This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.

Tonight, I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy.

[SNIP]

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

[ED. NOTE: The precedent for guest worker programs goes back at least to the Eisenhower administration.]

[SNIP]

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about $35, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best — just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses in a health savings account.

[SNIP]

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs.

[SNIP]

Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance. I urge you to pass association health plans. I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance.

[SNIP]

To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes.

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America's health care the best in the world.

[SNIP]

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement. Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the last two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001.

[SNIP]

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

[SNIP]

It's also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America's religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country — mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups, just because they have a cross or a Star of David or a crescent on the wall. By executive order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again.

[SNIP]

The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable — and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

[END EXCERPTS]


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushamnesty; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: Protagoras
It's not a fairy tale; it's a Pew Survey published in, of all places, The New York Times by none other than David Brooks.
381 posted on 01/22/2004 8:59:34 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: alnick




A vote for anyone but George W. Bush for president in 2004 strengthens Al Qaeda.

Fair enough.

Then, if the Bush Amnesty loses more votes than it gains,
it strengthens Al Qaeda.


382 posted on 01/22/2004 8:59:35 AM PST by Sabertooth (Pakistani Illegal Aliens Deport Themselves - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1058591/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
My sentiments exactly. While I like Mr. Bush as a person, I can't accept his socialist policies.

Sums it up for me.

383 posted on 01/22/2004 9:00:06 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
...That's a macro, isn't it? Or is it a flash fax? You all have the same talking points...

Not a macro, it's what's known as the truth. I would have thought you had heard of it.
384 posted on 01/22/2004 9:00:48 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
they will be allowed to remain here and pursue citizenship

This is new to me. Please show me where in any bill sponsored by Bush or quote from Bush that will give illegal aliens citizenship.

Bush's actual quote: "we should not give unfair rewards to illegal immigrants in the citizenship process or disadvantage those who came here lawfully"

385 posted on 01/22/2004 9:00:59 AM PST by m1-lightning (Weapons of deterrence do not deter terrorists; people of deterrence do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
Yes lets elect another Jimmy Carter, maybe we can get the Panama Canal back. Oh! I forgot, China has their claws around it now.

Yep .. and just think of all the other things he could give away now / sarcasm >

386 posted on 01/22/2004 9:01:08 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
America's security and future depend on keeping strong pro-military, pro-American Presidents in the White House. And Bush is the only one running who qualifies.

That means the war would have to be more important than me having my cake....

387 posted on 01/22/2004 9:01:15 AM PST by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist
Actually the fact that 90% of Republicans support Bush and his approval rating is only 50% means that all his support are coming from his base. That further proves the point that he may lose because of an unenthusiastic base. A portion of that 90% are not enthusiastic enough to take time out of their busy day to vote, and Bush loses.

Ah, no.

It proves that those of you screaming you are "the base" aren't.

388 posted on 01/22/2004 9:01:20 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
In the grand scheme of the electoral vote of SC going to Bush, my vote for someone else will not change it. So how is my vote going to elect a Dem?
389 posted on 01/22/2004 9:01:23 AM PST by looscnnn ("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: looscnnn
That is exactly what I am trying to start. A journey of a 1000 miles begins with one step.
390 posted on 01/22/2004 9:01:40 AM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist
Actually the fact that 90% of Republicans support Bush and his approval rating is only 50% means that all his support are coming from his base. That further proves the point that he may lose because of an unenthusiastic base. A portion of that 90% are not enthusiastic enough to take time out of their busy day to vote, and Bush loses

Uh Reagan won a landslide in 84 with a less of the percentage of the base supporting him.

391 posted on 01/22/2004 9:01:42 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
"Your whole post could've been distilled down to, "I think George W. Bush is a proven conservative because he gave us tax cuts and he's fighting terrorists." You cannot prove him to be conservative because he's not conservative, plain and simple."

What?! Would you call signing the ban on Partial Birth Abortions to be liberal?! Would you call killing the Kyoto Global Warming nonsense liberal?! Is building our national nuclear missile defense system liberal?! Tax cuts are liberal?! Fighting terror is liberal?! Cutting regulations (e.g. logging roads, CO2 rules for electricity generators, OSHA ergonomic rules, etc.) is liberal?!

392 posted on 01/22/2004 9:01:47 AM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist
Gridlock is the best we can hope for until we get a real Republican leader.

What happens when the House goes dim, and we lose control of the Senate? Oh! I see you have forgotten the Reign of LBJ.!

393 posted on 01/22/2004 9:02:10 AM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Ophiucus
What arrogant, self-absorbed, elitist bull****.

Elitist? RLOL! Yes, I'm typing this from my massive 1 acre estate, Pernland, in S. Louisiana, atop my throne in my 14 x 80 trailer! All hail King Pern!!

This coming from someone that obviously hasn't served in our nations military. Well, I have, and I see it going down the drain because of 'compromises' and 'elaborations' in the Constitution. I gave an oath, to defend the Constitution against ALL enemies. Not to defend the latest crook in office or a political party, but the Constitution.

All citizens vote - all are equally deserving of the right.

All citizens have the right to vote, it doesn't mean they deserve it.

394 posted on 01/22/2004 9:02:16 AM PST by Pern ("It's good to know who hates you, and it's good to be hated by the right people." - Johnny Cash, RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Pern
"Unlike most 'conservatives', I've actually served this country, therefore, I've actually earned my vote."

You better whoa down there a minute. Because I stayed home and raised 5 good Americans, I haven't EARNED the right to vote?

395 posted on 01/22/2004 9:02:21 AM PST by ostephani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
"His support is broad and will include more democrats this year."

Proof that he is a Liberal Republican. Domestically liberal, while strong on defense. The democrats should love him.
396 posted on 01/22/2004 9:02:21 AM PST by CSM (Council member Carol Schwartz (R.-at large), my new hero! The Anti anti Smoke Gnatzie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
c#392
397 posted on 01/22/2004 9:02:25 AM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
That's the "truth" as you would like it to be.

Try to drag yourself up to this century; the GOP is what it is; if it doesn't fit you, vote another party.
398 posted on 01/22/2004 9:02:51 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Hey Joe. Who's your candidate?
399 posted on 01/22/2004 9:03:01 AM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Do you have the nerve to answer?

Yep

How about you: what's your world going to look like with the Democrats back in control?

When did I ever say I was going to vote a straight third party ticket? My GOP congressman voted against CFR and I am damn sure going to vote for HIM.

Besides, Bush is going to pick up far more votes from the center-left than he's going to lose from that tiny minority of wingnuts that you think we are, so what's the problem?

400 posted on 01/22/2004 9:03:06 AM PST by Charlotte Corday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 2,001-2,015 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson