Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter: The Democrats' Idea of a General
World Net Daily ^ | Jan. 14, 2004 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 01/14/2004 4:32:15 PM PST by Mean Daddy

Democrats are so delirious about finding a general who is a pacifist scaredy-cat that no one seems to have bothered to investigate whether Wesley Clark is sane.

On "Meet the Press" back in November, Clark described intelligence as "a sort of gray goo as you look at it. You can't see through it, exactly, and if you try to touch it, it gets real sticky and you might actually interfere with the information that you're getting back. So you have to draw inferences from it." No, wait. I'm sorry. I think that was Clark talking about Monica Lewinsky's dress, not national security intelligence.

Meanwhile, Clark recently said that the "two greatest lies that have been told in the last three years" are: "You couldn't have prevented 9-11 and there's another one that's bound to happen." If he were president, Clark says, there would be no more terrorist attacks.

The adversarial watchdog press did not ask Clark to explain how he could guarantee an end to terrorist attacks, but recited Clark's prior statements calling for better intelligence. Apparently, if we could just refine the gray goo of intelligence to a magical terrorist-prediction machine, Clark could put an end to this terrorism nonsense once and for all.

Yes, I suppose if our intelligence agencies knew who the terrorists were and when they were going to strike, we could stop them. And if we knew who all the raving lunatics were, we could prevent these infernal Democratic presidential primary debates. Which reminds me, I think I know how we can win the lottery every week, too.

Liberals scoff at a system to shoot down incoming missiles, but believe that all random suicide bombers can be located and stopped before they strike. Hitting a bullet with a bullet just isn't feasible, so let's concentrate on something doable like predicting the future.

Democrats are utterly unfazed by the fact that Clark is crazier than a March hare. They are so happy to have a pacifist in uniform, they ignore his Norman Bates moments. When this peacenik criticizes the war in Iraq, he can puff up his puny chest and cite his own glorious experience with blood, sweat and tears in the Balkans.

Asked on "Meet the Press" what advice he would give Bush, Clark said: "I'd say, 'Mr. President, the first thing you've got to do is you've got to surrender' – stop right there and the Kucinich crowd is yours – 'exclusive U.S. control over this mission. ... Build an international organization like we did in the Balkans.'" Because, as everyone knows, Wesley Clark "built" NATO. This guy sounds more like Al Gore every day.

Asked what countries he proposed to bring into Iraq that weren't there already, Clark said, "I think you ask NATO ... just as I did in Kosovo, because this brings NATO into the problem." NATO is the logical choice for this job because of Iraq's extremely close proximity to the North Atlantic.

Evidently, Clark is sublimely confident that no one remembers anything about his misadventures in the Balkans.

Yugoslavia posed absolutely no threat to the United States – not imminent, not latent, not burgeoning, not now, not then, not ever. (Unless you count all the U.S. highway deaths caused by Yugos.) The president of Yugoslavia, Slobodan Milosevic, never tried to assassinate a U.S. president. He never shook his fist at the Great Satan. He didn't shelter and fund Muslim terrorists – though the people we were fighting for did.

In humanitarian terms, Milosevic didn't hold a candle to Saddam Hussein. Milosevic killed a few thousand Albanians in a ground war. Hussein killed well over a million Iranians, Kurds, Kuwaitis and Shias, among others. Milosevic had no rape rooms, no torture rooms, no Odai or Qusai. He didn't even use a wood chipper to dispose of his enemies, the piker.

And yet NATO, led by Gen. Wesley Clark, staged a pre-emptive attack on Yugoslavia.

Under Clark's command, the U.S. bombed the Chinese Embassy by mistake, killing three Chinese journalists. Other NATO air strikes under Clark mistakenly damaged the Swiss, Spanish, Swedish, Norwegian and Hungarian ambassadors' residences. Despite the absence of ground troops, Yugoslavia took three American POWs, whose release was eventually brokered by Jesse Jackson. America was standing tall.

Clark's forces bombed a civilian convoy by mistake, killing more than 70 ethnic Albanians, and then Clark openly lied about it to the press. First he denied NATO had done it, and when forced to retract that, Clark pinned the blame on an innocent U.S. pilot. As New York Newsday reported on April 18, 1999: "American officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the staff of Army Gen. Wesley Clark, the NATO commander, pointed to an innocent F-16 Falcon pilot who was castigated by the media for blasting a refugee convoy." Eventually, even a model of probity like Bill Clinton was shocked by Clark's mendacity and fired him.

At the end of major combat operations led by NATO Supreme Allied Commander Gen. Wesley Clark, arch-villain Slobodan Milosevic was still in power. (At least Clark won't have to worry about any embarrassing "mission accomplished" photo-ops coming back to haunt him.) Today, almost a decade and $15 billion later, U.S. troops are still bogged down in the Balkans. No quagmire there!

That's the Democrats' idea of a general.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; clark; coulter; wesleyclark; whataweasel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Mean Daddy
bttt
21 posted on 01/14/2004 5:52:38 PM PST by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
 DEAN IS

22 posted on 01/14/2004 6:55:18 PM PST by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
INTREP - This is the reason "real" Generals warn against supporting this looney-tuner
23 posted on 01/14/2004 8:27:48 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
Yugo's as a Weapon of Mass Destruction... hilarious.
24 posted on 01/14/2004 9:25:22 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tagline shut down for renovations and repairs. Re-open June of 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
Thanks for another Coulter classic! Just emailed this link to many who will love it.
25 posted on 01/15/2004 4:51:21 AM PST by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
What a great summary of a FReepin' LOSER's history!
26 posted on 01/15/2004 6:04:47 AM PST by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
as everyone knows, Wesley Clark "built" NATO. This guy sounds more like Al Gore every day.

The great thing about Ann is that she has not yet developed the kind of tone-deafness that so many conservatives acquire after years of listening to the liberal whine. After a while, all their rhetoric becomes a meaningless hum of sound and fury, signifying nothing...

b*tch slaps the Dems Ann just repeats what they've said, injecting reality. She can't hurt them any more than they hurt themselves.

27 posted on 01/15/2004 7:13:06 AM PST by Dutchgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Yeah, but Hackworth is smitten by wesley. Must be the Ralph Lauren perfume....

David Hackworth a "Friend of Dorothy?" He certainly acted like one when he was on Politically Incorrect a few years back.

28 posted on 01/15/2004 2:07:36 PM PST by Clemenza (East side, West side, all around the town. Tripping the light fantastic on the sidewalks of New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Yugoslavia posed absolutely no threat to the United States – not imminent, not latent, not burgeoning, not now, not then, not ever. (Unless you count all the U.S. highway deaths caused by Yugos.)

Well, yes, the Yugo a was a good enough excuse to bomb Yugoslavia!

BTW, I saw a Yugo in at an auto show back in the ‘80’s, the first year of it’s release. The engine block already had rust on it, just sitting in the show!

29 posted on 01/15/2004 2:16:50 PM PST by Lurking in Kansas (No tagline here... move along)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
Another point-How bad are you , if the Clintons get rid of you for ethics and character problems?
30 posted on 01/15/2004 2:24:00 PM PST by fly_so_free (Never underestimate the treachery of the democrat party-Save USA-Vote a Democrat out of office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
"NATO is the logical choice for this job because of Iraq's extremely close proximity to the North Atlantic."

2549 miles, as the crow flies (Baghdad to London). Since, at 2696 miles from Anacortes, Wa. to Honolulu, I am in close proximity to Hawaii, I will be heading on outside to work on my tan. See ya! (what a maroon)
31 posted on 01/15/2004 3:04:19 PM PST by beelzepug ("It'll ooze a bit, 'eads do, ya know.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking in Kansas
"I saw a Yugo in at an auto show...The engine block already had rust on it...

"...a good enough excuse to bomb Yugoslavia!"

I guess the Vega would have justified bombing Detroit!
32 posted on 01/15/2004 3:07:49 PM PST by beelzepug ("It'll ooze a bit, 'eads do, ya know.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug
Yup. Another POS built by Vegans. Probably ran on carrot juice.

BTW, where are the Vegans? In close proximity to Yugoslavia, I bet.
33 posted on 01/15/2004 3:24:53 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug
I guess the Vega would have justified bombing Detroit!

You are correct, Sir!

LOL! I had a '74 Vega, it was the biggest POS for a car I have ever owned. Fortunately it burned oil so bad that the smoke cloud hid the rust. It got me through college (a miracle) and I unloaded it on some kid for $400. Laughing all the away to the bank!

Yes sir, someone does deserve to die for creating that excuse for a car. BTW, that was the LAST Chevy I owned.

34 posted on 01/15/2004 7:36:27 PM PST by Lurking in Kansas (No tagline here... move along)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lurking in Kansas
I also had a Vega. Can't remember the year though (did they make more that one year). The gas guage didn't work very well.
After the 5th time I ran out of gas, I sold it... to my dad.
I tried to talk him out of it, but he was in love with it. He kept it for three months. I actually saw one on the road recently, no rust and in running condition. They're probably more model "T"'s on the road than Vegas these days.
35 posted on 01/19/2004 1:43:56 PM PST by kylaka (The Clintons are the democRATS crack cocaine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson