Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TIME Exclusive: IRAQ INSURGENTS SHOW OFF FIREPOWER TO TIME
Time ^ | Sunday, Dec. 07, 2003 | Brian Bennett and Michael Ware

Posted on 12/07/2003 11:39:02 AM PST by At _War_With_Liberals

TIME Interviews Dozens of Insurgents and Disgruntled Iraqis, Attends Resistance Meetings and Views Videotape of Attacks Against Coalition Forces Guerillas Trying to Drive U.S. Casualties So High That American Public Turns Against The War – ‘They Could Succeed,’ Pentagon Official Says

New York -- U.S. intelligence experts now believe the Iraq insurgents are a volatile mix of groups and free-lancers who include loyalists of the former ruling Baath Party, Fedayeen militiamen, former Republican Guard and intelligence agents, foreign jihadis, professional terrorists, paid common criminals and disaffected Iraqis, TIME's Brian Bennett and Michael Ware report from Iraq.

Over the past three months, TIME has interviewed dozens of insurgents and disgruntled Iraqis, attended resistance meetings and viewed videotape of attacks against coalition forces. Often reporters have been required to submit to blindfolds, circuitous drives by night, vehicle switching, meetings that rarely occurred in the same place and, of course, frequent personal searches for phones and tracking devices. (At no time did TIME reporters have prior information about attacks.) As seen from the inside, the insurgency looks as complex and diverse an enemy as the U.S. could possibly face.

Showing Firepower: Inside Attack on Baghdad Airport: At the modest farmhouse of a fellow member of his network of insurgents one recent evening, Abu Ali—the nom de guerre he has chosen—welcomes seven fighters into a room lined with worn sofas. Checking his watch, he abruptly rises from a sofa, throws on a woolen overcoat and orders everyone, including the reporter, to move out. The men pile into three cars and tear off in different directions. For more than an hour they cruise near the launch site until all looks clear. Then a small team walks into a flat field to aim a rack of homemade launching tubes toward the lights of the Baghdad airport, home to U.S. chopper squadrons, supply units and the CIA-led Iraq Survey Group, less than two miles away. The insurgents load three air-to-air rockets they have modified to launch from the ground, flash a signal with car headlights and disappear. A second team creeps in to fire the volley, while a security detail armed with assault rifles and machine guns forms a perimeter. Beyond these fighters, according to the cell’s security chief, a ring of men with shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles and rocket-propelled grenades is watching for U.S. helicopters that might try to stop them, TIME reports.

Bolder, Better Organized -- “They Could Succeed”: Attacks against coalition forces have grown bolder, better organized and broader based. A double ambush last week in Samarra “was the biggest, most sophisticated so far,” says a senior intelligence official in Washington. As a Pentagon official sees it: “They know they can’t beat us militarily, but they think they might be able to defeat us politically.” The guerrillas are trying to drive U.S. casualties so high that the American public turns against the war, he says, adding, "They could succeed."

"Bring Back Saddam": Under the apparent leadership of experienced former Saddam loyalists, the resistance network is growing more organized. Leaders of small cells that once acted independently now share intelligence and tactics and divide up targets. "They’re colonels, lieutenant colonels and majors who are really the hard-core loyalists," U.S. Major General Raymond Ordierno, commander of the 4th Infantry Division, tells TIME.

"Allah is Great": Not all the rank-and-file fighters are die-hard Saddam supporters. Many are thought to be devout Iraqi Muslims who believe that fighting “infidel” occupiers is a Koranic imperative. Tensions exist between former military officers and paid militia, called fedayeen in insurgent circles, and the Muslim fighters who label themselves mujahedin, or holy warrior. U.S. officials believe most of them then carry out missions under the orders of Saddam loyalists. "They use the fundamentalists as cannon fodder," especially for lethal attacks on soft targets involving car bombs, say the officials. "Suicide bombers are generally not Iraqis or former regime types." Abu Abdullah, who earns his living building houses along the Euphrates River , says, "Islam tells us that no one should occupy our land. The Koran allows us to kill anyone to defend our country."

The Terrorists -- "Down with the U.S.": Senior U.S. intelligence officials say a small number of dedicated terrorists slipped into the country just after the U.S. invasion. "They are burrowing way down, looking for opportunities to strike for maximum political impact," contends Senator Jack Reed, a Democrat who toured Iraq with colleague Hillary Clinton.

Mock Funerals for Soldiers Training to be Suicide Bombers: Some intelligence officials point a finger at Ansar al-Islam, a small Kurdish terror group that operated out of the northern mountains of Iraq against local Kurd rulers before the U.S. invasion. Intelligence officials say some of the highly trained men slipped away to regroup in Iran. Before the war, Ansar soldiers training to be suicide bombers were given elaborate mock funerals to prepare them mentally for their martyrdom.

How Bush Administration Portrays Insurgency: The Bush Administration, for its part, wants to portray the insurgency as mainly homegrown. That allows Washington to claim, as it repeatedly does, that when the die-hards run out of men and munitions the insurgency will dissipate. It also allows Bush to avoid the charge that the war actually increased danger to the U.S. by stirring up a hornet’s nest of terrorism. Yet the Administration’s greatest fear is that the rebellion will get too local if the general population turns on the occupiers. "We minimize their impact at our peril," says a Pentagon official.

New Effort to Blunt Insurgency: In a new effort to blunt the insurgency, the U.S. Central Command plans to form an Iraqi quick-reaction force that can identify and counter the guerillas better than the U.S. can.

What Really Happened in Samarra? In a companion story about the Nov. 30 battle near Samarra, where U.S. officials reported they had killed 54 Iraqi fighters, Bennett reports the dispute over the battle’s body count bears echoes of Vietnam, where casualty figures were routinely inflated. The U.S. has not been giving out such numbers in Iraq, but seemed eager to publicize this battle’s hefty total. Samarra hospital officials still insist that only eight Iraqis were killed, and last Monday afternoon TIME saw just two bodies lying in the hospital morgue: an elderly man and a middle-aged woman, both with Iranian identity cards. U.S. commanders stand by numbers they say were tallied from precise after-battle reports. Besides, says Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt, the Army’s deputy operations director, "I can’t imagine why the enemy would want to bring a dead body to the hospital."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aidandcomfort; antiamericanism; aoltimewbturnercnn; bigmedia; enemy; iraq; iraqaftermath; iraqiterrorism; mediabias; terrorism; terrorists; time; timemag; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 461 next last
To: All
And just for good measure, as an Amazon affiliate guess which book they choose (as far as I know there is no "revolving" feature that automatically puts different titles on the affiliate site) to feature at the bottom of this article?
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right By: Al Franken

Our enemies could ask for no more encouragement than they have gotten from this article. I am deeply saddened by this.
81 posted on 12/07/2003 2:58:35 PM PST by BattleFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
I won't subscribe to TIME but my mother in law keeps giving them to my husband. I was just telling him after seeing the cr*p article in the Dec. 3rd issue about Bush that I don't even want it in the house. I'm throwing it out right now!!!!> arggg.....
82 posted on 12/07/2003 2:58:56 PM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
NORM SAYS:

"Each dead American is worth a 1/2 point of share!"


83 posted on 12/07/2003 3:01:01 PM PST by ChadGore (No blood for ratings! This means YOU AOL-Time-Warner-Turner-CNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

CEO Norman Pearlstine
pearlstine@time-inc.com
The Suck Who Green Lighted The Slaughter Of Our People For A Few Points Of Market Share
pearlstine@time-inc.com

84 posted on 12/07/2003 3:02:31 PM PST by ChadGore (No blood for ratings! This means YOU AOL-Time-Warner-Turner-CNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: All
Stop and think everyone...how many GI's lives could have been saved with this information?...Im sick over this.
85 posted on 12/07/2003 3:02:35 PM PST by mystery-ak (GodSpeed, Mike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: edskid
You are right, we will never recover from the Clinton's, nor will be rid of them. That evil Marxist witch in the Pink today is running for President and if the media can help that happen, they will! Prayers for your son!
86 posted on 12/07/2003 3:03:03 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter; ABG(anybody but Gore); Angelwood; arazitjh; b4its2late; backhoe; bamafour; ...
ping
87 posted on 12/07/2003 3:03:55 PM PST by kayak (The Vast, Right-Wing Conspiracy is truly Vast! [JohnHuang2])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
Over the past three months, TIME has interviewed dozens of insurgents and disgruntled Iraqis, attended resistance meetings and viewed videotape of attacks against coalition forces.

But they should have been trusted with the knowledge of Bush's trip to Iraq. On the other hand, a live demonstration of the Iraqi insurgents' firepower would have made a great Thanksgiving-week cover.

-PJ

88 posted on 12/07/2003 3:04:01 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
CEO Norman Pearlstine
pearlstine@time-inc.com
The Suck Who Green Lighted The Slaughter Of Our People For A Few Points Of Market Share
pearlstine@time-inc.com

89 posted on 12/07/2003 3:06:13 PM PST by ChadGore (No blood for ratings! This means YOU AOL-Time-Warner-Turner-CNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Mercat
Bad is not the word. I have been laid up for ten months, studying the direction of the country and the media collusion. This is a new low.

Wait until Hillary is drafted. I am now CONVICED, as are many others. See this thread for the most compelling arguments to date:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1035794/posts?q=1&&page=1
90 posted on 12/07/2003 3:07:20 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Hey TIME, "No blood for interviews")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Anti-McGovern
These motherf**ckers have made me so mad my head is spinning. If this is not treason, I want to know what the f**k is treason.
91 posted on 12/07/2003 3:07:31 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Yes, I remember that Time kept quiet about Iraq so they wouldn't be kicked out! Sure, I really believe that don't you? BS meter!

We cannot keep quiet about this. This is something FreeRepublic exists for! We have to do something besides complain to each other. We just have to!! Our troops lives and our own depend on it.
92 posted on 12/07/2003 3:11:47 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
The DoD should now take these vermin into custody and interrogate them for an indefinite period. They voluntarily interviewed the very scum we're fighting against - in a war zone - and merrily filed a story on it? First Amendment be damned - that's collusion with the enemy. "Hey! America! Look what the enemy is going to do to YOUR sons and daughters!"
93 posted on 12/07/2003 3:12:11 PM PST by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
Here is the chief muckety muck of Time Warner/AOL. The Time Warner /AOL board of Terror Directors URL

http://www.timewarner.com/senior_management/board_of_directors.adp

http://www.timewarner.com/senior_management/bio/ParsonsRicha.adp

94 posted on 12/07/2003 3:12:55 PM PST by chadsworth (Hillary MUST BE STOPPED BEFORE 2004 ; Davis WAS REMOVED, Now we need to work on the State Assembly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: All
If you ever left a message on an answering machine you can do this!
It's really that simple. AND It's a Toll Free Number !

You can leave one or more new messages each day.


Send deployed troops message on SoldiersRadio.com

SoldiersRadio is again this year providing a way to let you tell Service members worldwide that you care and are thinking about them during the Holidays.

You can do an Audio Post Card simply by calling 1-800-330-5090.
Your recorded personalized message will be played back on www.SoldiersRadio.com.

You can record a short message (30 seconds) to friends, family members or just a random message of good will. SoldiersRadio will then take your message and put it on the radio Web cast throughout the Holiday Season. Its very simple to do and works both ways ... from the field or to the Service member.

AnyServiceMember.org is also promoting the call-in holiday service in hopes of reaching a large group of people who would like to send a message to Soldiers serving away from home.

The cut-off date for the call in is Dec.15.
SoldiersRadio.com


95 posted on 12/07/2003 3:13:29 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Have you said Thank You to a service man or woman today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
"But they should have been trusted with the knowledge of Bush's trip to Iraq. On the other hand, a live demonstration of the Iraqi insurgents' firepower would have made a great Thanksgiving-week cover.
"

Great point. Also, are we to believe, they spent 3 weeks in an enemy camp who they are sympathetic to, and did not add ANYTHING to the meetings???

No way. Don't buy it. They, at the very least, outlined US public sentiment on the war and probably told them that if they could continue their success. November, the deadliest month, could be A DIRECT RESULT of the media collusion with Iraqis.

Only these reporters passing an FBI lie detector test will convince me otherwise. Will they take it? They should have nothing to fear, because they said they had nothing to do with the meetings AT ALL.
96 posted on 12/07/2003 3:14:00 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Hey TIME, "No blood for interviews")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
Since they want to run around with enemy combatants, classify them as enemy combatants and ship them off to Gitmo. Who knows, the interrogators might help them to "remember" some information out of them that they, I'm sure, have just "forgotten".

Then charge them with treason, convict them and hang them.

None dare call it Treason...

97 posted on 12/07/2003 3:14:15 PM PST by Warhammer ("Where are you going?" "I'm going to pick a fight" -- Braveheart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
"I wouldn't be surprised if TIME paid them under the
table. "

Paid them, heck I bet they even got the missiles for them, so they actually had something to write about!

Bunch of traitors!
98 posted on 12/07/2003 3:15:11 PM PST by battousai (Coming Soon to an election near you: Pasty White Hillary and the Nine Dwarfs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
I've, so far, sent about 57 emails to this guy, each one unique, with it's on subject line, explaining just how wrong he was to green light this project.


CEO Norman Pearlstine
pearlstine@time-inc.com
The Suck Who Green Lighted The Slaughter Of Our People For A Few Points Of Market Share
pearlstine@time-inc.com

99 posted on 12/07/2003 3:15:18 PM PST by ChadGore (No blood for ratings! This means YOU AOL-Time-Warner-Turner-CNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002
Dang! You beat me to it!
100 posted on 12/07/2003 3:15:50 PM PST by Warhammer ("Where are you going?" "I'm going to pick a fight" -- Braveheart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson