Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TIME Exclusive: IRAQ INSURGENTS SHOW OFF FIREPOWER TO TIME
Time ^ | Sunday, Dec. 07, 2003 | Brian Bennett and Michael Ware

Posted on 12/07/2003 11:39:02 AM PST by At _War_With_Liberals

TIME Interviews Dozens of Insurgents and Disgruntled Iraqis, Attends Resistance Meetings and Views Videotape of Attacks Against Coalition Forces Guerillas Trying to Drive U.S. Casualties So High That American Public Turns Against The War – ‘They Could Succeed,’ Pentagon Official Says

New York -- U.S. intelligence experts now believe the Iraq insurgents are a volatile mix of groups and free-lancers who include loyalists of the former ruling Baath Party, Fedayeen militiamen, former Republican Guard and intelligence agents, foreign jihadis, professional terrorists, paid common criminals and disaffected Iraqis, TIME's Brian Bennett and Michael Ware report from Iraq.

Over the past three months, TIME has interviewed dozens of insurgents and disgruntled Iraqis, attended resistance meetings and viewed videotape of attacks against coalition forces. Often reporters have been required to submit to blindfolds, circuitous drives by night, vehicle switching, meetings that rarely occurred in the same place and, of course, frequent personal searches for phones and tracking devices. (At no time did TIME reporters have prior information about attacks.) As seen from the inside, the insurgency looks as complex and diverse an enemy as the U.S. could possibly face.

Showing Firepower: Inside Attack on Baghdad Airport: At the modest farmhouse of a fellow member of his network of insurgents one recent evening, Abu Ali—the nom de guerre he has chosen—welcomes seven fighters into a room lined with worn sofas. Checking his watch, he abruptly rises from a sofa, throws on a woolen overcoat and orders everyone, including the reporter, to move out. The men pile into three cars and tear off in different directions. For more than an hour they cruise near the launch site until all looks clear. Then a small team walks into a flat field to aim a rack of homemade launching tubes toward the lights of the Baghdad airport, home to U.S. chopper squadrons, supply units and the CIA-led Iraq Survey Group, less than two miles away. The insurgents load three air-to-air rockets they have modified to launch from the ground, flash a signal with car headlights and disappear. A second team creeps in to fire the volley, while a security detail armed with assault rifles and machine guns forms a perimeter. Beyond these fighters, according to the cell’s security chief, a ring of men with shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles and rocket-propelled grenades is watching for U.S. helicopters that might try to stop them, TIME reports.

Bolder, Better Organized -- “They Could Succeed”: Attacks against coalition forces have grown bolder, better organized and broader based. A double ambush last week in Samarra “was the biggest, most sophisticated so far,” says a senior intelligence official in Washington. As a Pentagon official sees it: “They know they can’t beat us militarily, but they think they might be able to defeat us politically.” The guerrillas are trying to drive U.S. casualties so high that the American public turns against the war, he says, adding, "They could succeed."

"Bring Back Saddam": Under the apparent leadership of experienced former Saddam loyalists, the resistance network is growing more organized. Leaders of small cells that once acted independently now share intelligence and tactics and divide up targets. "They’re colonels, lieutenant colonels and majors who are really the hard-core loyalists," U.S. Major General Raymond Ordierno, commander of the 4th Infantry Division, tells TIME.

"Allah is Great": Not all the rank-and-file fighters are die-hard Saddam supporters. Many are thought to be devout Iraqi Muslims who believe that fighting “infidel” occupiers is a Koranic imperative. Tensions exist between former military officers and paid militia, called fedayeen in insurgent circles, and the Muslim fighters who label themselves mujahedin, or holy warrior. U.S. officials believe most of them then carry out missions under the orders of Saddam loyalists. "They use the fundamentalists as cannon fodder," especially for lethal attacks on soft targets involving car bombs, say the officials. "Suicide bombers are generally not Iraqis or former regime types." Abu Abdullah, who earns his living building houses along the Euphrates River , says, "Islam tells us that no one should occupy our land. The Koran allows us to kill anyone to defend our country."

The Terrorists -- "Down with the U.S.": Senior U.S. intelligence officials say a small number of dedicated terrorists slipped into the country just after the U.S. invasion. "They are burrowing way down, looking for opportunities to strike for maximum political impact," contends Senator Jack Reed, a Democrat who toured Iraq with colleague Hillary Clinton.

Mock Funerals for Soldiers Training to be Suicide Bombers: Some intelligence officials point a finger at Ansar al-Islam, a small Kurdish terror group that operated out of the northern mountains of Iraq against local Kurd rulers before the U.S. invasion. Intelligence officials say some of the highly trained men slipped away to regroup in Iran. Before the war, Ansar soldiers training to be suicide bombers were given elaborate mock funerals to prepare them mentally for their martyrdom.

How Bush Administration Portrays Insurgency: The Bush Administration, for its part, wants to portray the insurgency as mainly homegrown. That allows Washington to claim, as it repeatedly does, that when the die-hards run out of men and munitions the insurgency will dissipate. It also allows Bush to avoid the charge that the war actually increased danger to the U.S. by stirring up a hornet’s nest of terrorism. Yet the Administration’s greatest fear is that the rebellion will get too local if the general population turns on the occupiers. "We minimize their impact at our peril," says a Pentagon official.

New Effort to Blunt Insurgency: In a new effort to blunt the insurgency, the U.S. Central Command plans to form an Iraqi quick-reaction force that can identify and counter the guerillas better than the U.S. can.

What Really Happened in Samarra? In a companion story about the Nov. 30 battle near Samarra, where U.S. officials reported they had killed 54 Iraqi fighters, Bennett reports the dispute over the battle’s body count bears echoes of Vietnam, where casualty figures were routinely inflated. The U.S. has not been giving out such numbers in Iraq, but seemed eager to publicize this battle’s hefty total. Samarra hospital officials still insist that only eight Iraqis were killed, and last Monday afternoon TIME saw just two bodies lying in the hospital morgue: an elderly man and a middle-aged woman, both with Iranian identity cards. U.S. commanders stand by numbers they say were tallied from precise after-battle reports. Besides, says Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt, the Army’s deputy operations director, "I can’t imagine why the enemy would want to bring a dead body to the hospital."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aidandcomfort; antiamericanism; aoltimewbturnercnn; bigmedia; enemy; iraq; iraqaftermath; iraqiterrorism; mediabias; terrorism; terrorists; time; timemag; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461 next last
To: Anti-McGovern
I think that the Bush admin has a duty to expose this propaganda to the American people. This is not a first amendment issue. They won't, of course.

http://www.time.com/time/

Check out the Time cover art for this headline prop piece...
They have redefined the enemy, and provided an image on the cover to ROMANTICIZE the enemy. The subtext is ' a noble freedom fighter defending against illegal, immoral US tyranny'. I say this because they have used this type of cover to glorify rebels many times over the years.
21 posted on 12/07/2003 1:07:06 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Hey TIME, "No blood for interviews")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Even during the sitcom reruns, the mantras are repeated, againt republicans.

The argument about the media being Rep controlled was typical. We defended against the attack publicly, but never counter attacked. We are constantly on the defense, and with media treachery, that is a losing plan. People mock Newsmax and Coulter, but they are on the offensive! Whenever we go on the offensive, people in our own party cry foul.
22 posted on 12/07/2003 1:11:52 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Hey TIME, "No blood for interviews")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Timesink; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Alamo-Girl; Howlin; BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave
You gotta read this. Grrrr!
23 posted on 12/07/2003 1:39:52 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
And to think the journalists are whining because the President "didn't trust them" when he visited Iraq. I keep seeing so many reasons why he should not have (like this one), but haven't yet found one reason to think he should have trusted them.
24 posted on 12/07/2003 1:41:32 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Treasonous SOBs.
25 posted on 12/07/2003 1:43:56 PM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tet68
TIME Magazine: "Please attack and kill my fellow countrymen at sun down, so the photographer can back light you just right while you plant the but of your AK into what used to be one of my people"

I swear to god, WHO RUNS AOL/TIME WARNER ?!?!?!

26 posted on 12/07/2003 1:49:40 PM PST by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; Pharmboy; reformed_democrat; RatherBiased.com; nopardons; Tamsey; Miss Marple; SwatTeam; ...

This is the Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this is a medium- to high-volume list.
Please feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of this ping list. I can't catch them all!


27 posted on 12/07/2003 1:52:28 PM PST by Timesink (I'm not a big fan of electronic stuff, you know? Beeps ... beeps freak me out. They're bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
AOL/TIME WARNER: NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS !

I swear to G_d, if I had their CEO in front of me right now, I'de read him the riot act, AFTER Demanding and exepting his resignation, on behalf of the American lives he helps to destroy.

28 posted on 12/07/2003 1:52:37 PM PST by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
OK, fine. What are we supposed to do? Boycott TIME/Warner? Hell, I COULDN'T give them any less money than I already do. Write to my congressmen? One of my senators (Harkin) would probably want to fly into Baghdad to strategize with these stains. Organize the Republicans to fight back? Might as well try to herd neutered cats. Get Americans outraged? Sure... FR and WND trump Katie Couric and Dan Rather.

Yeah, I'm frustrated. This crap from Time is treason, it is agitprop, and it is the sorry, debased state of what was once journalism... but is now straight political activism. This group of First Amendment chameleons are deliberately positioning themselves to get our soldiers (my son among them) killed, and you have no idea how much I loathe them. The sad truth is that these criminal bastards and their bosses have attained their goals, and this country will never ever be able to repair the post-Clintonian internal rot. You know what they do to buildings that can't be repaired? Give me another year like this one, and I'm willing to light the damned match.

Frustrated? Actually, I'm exasperated, and I'm beyond being placated.

29 posted on 12/07/2003 1:54:41 PM PST by niteowl77 (If you haven't prayed for our troops, please start; if you stopped, then do some catching up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
keep seeing so many reasons why he should not have (like this one), but haven't yet found one reason to think he should have trusted them

Well, darn, you can't see them whining and stamping their feet saying "no fair, no fair"? Why I feel their pain.. or is it I am their pain?

I dunno.
30 posted on 12/07/2003 1:55:36 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: edskid
Go after the advertisers. I haven't subbed to Time in years, and I refuse to use AOL--and so on. But advertising is the lifeblood of such publications.
31 posted on 12/07/2003 1:57:34 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals; chadsworth
My God! This is just another outrage from the people at Time! I am just enraged that these "journalists" would actually interview the terrorists and keep their whereabouts secret!

They are traitors and just as responsible for the deaths of our soldiers as the terrorists themselves.
Where the hell is the investigation of them?
32 posted on 12/07/2003 1:59:32 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
Re: "Leaders of small cells that once acted independently now share intelligence and tactics and divide up targets. "They’re colonels, lieutenant colonels and majors who are really the hard-core loyalists,"

FINE !! TIME: WHERE THE F_CK IS YOUR FAX MACHINE????

Fax is over to US command!

Post is *all* in great detail on the internet for the world to see. I demand transparency, and I remand the CEO of AOL Time/Warner be asked to step down for green lighting the slaughter of my countrymen.

33 posted on 12/07/2003 2:00:20 PM PST by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Miss Marple; Howlin; ohioWfan; Grampa Dave
Did you see this?
34 posted on 12/07/2003 2:01:53 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
Man, if anyone still reads Time they long ago took the Matrix pill and are stupid.

Its sheeple-brainfood.

35 posted on 12/07/2003 2:02:21 PM PST by Helms (Liberalism is a faux compassion that condescends at best and subjugates at worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All

Whats next?

Exclusive in TIME: "The misunderstood men of the Einsatzgruppen"

"The gentle bespectacled Werner, who reads Goethe and Schiller is trying to build a better world for his Frau and Kinder."

36 posted on 12/07/2003 2:03:26 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim (SSDD - Same S#it Different Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Boycott? Yeah, that'll scare 'em.... Soros and ACT could still float them over any sandbars you and I can make.
37 posted on 12/07/2003 2:03:39 PM PST by niteowl77 (If you haven't prayed for our troops, please start; if you stopped, then do some catching up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Serious Domestic Enemies ping
38 posted on 12/07/2003 2:04:27 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim (SSDD - Same S#it Different Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: edskid
Re: What are we supposed to do? Boycott TIME/Warner?

I, for one, call for the resignation of the CEO of Time/Warner for greenlighting the blood shed of my fellow countrymen for a few ratings points.

To the CEO of Time/Warner (whoeverthehellyouare): Find the "synergy" in that, while you apply for a new job delivering my pizza!

How *DARE* the CEO of Time/Warner green light the killing of my fellow countrymen.

What did he know and when did he know it ?

39 posted on 12/07/2003 2:04:51 PM PST by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: edskid
You have any better ideas? Should we just stand around and wring our hands and calling them traitors? Next time I'm out shopping, I plan on looking through a Time and jotting down the major advertisers. Then I'm going to write to them. The rest of you can do whatever the heck you please--handwringing or whatever.
40 posted on 12/07/2003 2:08:46 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson