Skip to comments.
Senate Intelligence Committee Memo
Posted on 11/05/2003 12:21:19 PM PST by AndyObermann
I hope everyone has had a chance to read this piece from Newsmax about the Senate Intelligence Committee Memo concerning its Democrat members taking advantage of their position to call for an independent counsel investigation of the Bush Admin's intelligence before invading Iraq? Apparently they are trying to use their power to influence election 2004. The problem is that the story has disappeared from both Newsmax and Fox News web sites. It was there at 8:00 this morning. Any thoughts?
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2004election; 2004memo; antiamericanism; antibush; bushbashing; election2004; memogate; ratttricks; sedition; smearcampaign; treason; unamerican
To: AndyObermann
2
posted on
11/05/2003 12:24:11 PM PST
by
devnull
To: AndyObermann
To: AndyObermann
Sean is talking about it again today on his show.
4
posted on
11/05/2003 12:25:37 PM PST
by
mathluv
To: AndyObermann
Mixing the words "intelligence" and "Democrat" in the same article cause the computers at those news agencies to explode.
5
posted on
11/05/2003 12:25:44 PM PST
by
aardvark1
To: AndyObermann
Turn on HANNITY......He's still going at it about this mempo
6
posted on
11/05/2003 12:25:47 PM PST
by
OXENinFLA
( Attempt to evaluate curvature at parametric singularity.)
To: devnull
Transcript of a memo written by a Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee staff suggesting how to make the greatest gain off of intelligence data leading to the war against Iraq.
We have carefully reviewed our options under the rules and believe we have identified the best approach. Our plan is as follows:
1) Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard. For example, in addition to the president's State of the Union speech, the chairman has agreed to look at the activities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State Department. The fact that the chairman supports our investigations into these offices and co-signs our requests for information is helpful and potentially crucial. We don't know what we will find but our prospects for getting the access we seek is far greater when we have the backing of the majority. (Note: we can verbally mention some of the intriguing leads we are pursuing.)
2) Assiduously prepare Democratic "additional views" to attach to any interim or final reports the committee may release. Committee rules provide this opportunity and we intend to take full advantage of it. In that regard, we have already compiled all the public statements on Iraq made by senior administration officials. We will identify the most exaggerated claims and contrast them with the intelligence estimates that have since been declassified. Our additional views will also, among other things, castigate the majority for seeking to limit the scope of the inquiry. The Democrats will then be in a strong position to reopen the question of establishing an independent commission (i.e. the Corzine amendment).
3) Prepare to launch an independent investigation when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate with the majority. We can pull the trigger on an independent investigation at any time-- but we can only do so once. The best time to do so will probably be next year either:
A) After we have already released our additional views on an interim report -- thereby providing as many as three opportunities to make our case to the public: 1) additional views on the interim report; 2) announcement of our independent investigation; and 3) additional views on the final investigation; or
B) Once we identify solid leads the majority does not want to pursue. We could attract more coverage and have greater credibility in that context than one in which we simply launch an independent investigation based on principled but vague notions regarding the "use" of intelligence.
In the meantime, even without a specifically authorized independent investigation, we continue to act independently when we encounter foot-dragging on the part of the majority. For example, the FBI Niger investigation was done solely at the request of the vice chairman; we have independently submitted written questions to DoD; and we are preparing further independent requests for information.
Summary
Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet, we have an important role to play in the revealing the misleading -- if not flagrantly dishonest methods and motives -- of the senior administration officials who made the case for a unilateral, preemptive war. The approach outline above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives and methods.
7
posted on
11/05/2003 12:27:54 PM PST
by
weegee
To: AndyObermann
HAS ANYONE CUAGHT THIS??????
For example, the FBI Niger investigation was done solely at the request of the vice chairman;
We were told by ALL the media that the CIA asked for this...but it was Rockerfeller....There are some big LIES going on here!!!!!!!!!
To: AndyObermann
Dont' take it anymore -- Please call talk radio and write your media today to protest the Memo from the DemocRAT side of the Intelligence Committee. You can find the information you need for your area by visiting Bush-Cheney '04 at:
While you are taking action, be sure and write your Senators demanding action to find out what scumbag approved/wrote this Memo. For Contact Information, please Click on the Link Below:
9
posted on
11/05/2003 12:39:22 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Don't forget to Visit/donate at http://www.georgewbush.com)
To: devnull
Sorry about that, Fox news moved it from where it was this morning on the site. Newmax has definately took it down though. I read it at eight o'clock this morning and it was there and I checked at ~1:oo and it was gone.
To: AndyObermann
11
posted on
11/01/2005 3:41:34 PM PST
by
MamaLucci
(Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson