Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Market Monitor -- Michael O'Higgins, President of O'Higgins Asset Management -- NBR Interview
Nightly Business Report ^ | 10/24/03 | Interview Transcript

Posted on 10/25/2003 12:04:13 PM PDT by arete

XXX >>>> Streaming Video <<<< XXX

PAUL KANGAS: My guest market monitor this week is Michael O'Higgins, President of O'Higgins Asset Management. And welcome back to NIGHTLY BUSINESS REPORT, Michael.

MICHAEL O'HIGGINS, PRES O'HIGGINS ASSET MANAGEMENT: Thank you, Paul. Nice to be here.

KANGAS: Great to see you. You know, for some time, you have been one of the most vocal bears on the stock market. Has the strong recent rally of recent months changed your mind at all?

O'HIGGINS: No. On the contrary. It's made me more bearish than ever.

KANGAS: Why? Because it's getting far more overvalued than you thought it was last time?

O'HIGGINS: The higher it goes, the more overvalued it becomes.

KANGAS: But look at what you've missed. You know, the last time you were with us in March, the Dow was around 8,500. Now it's testing the 10,000 range. And the NASDAQ Composite was way down at 1,400. Now it's 1,800. You missed some big moves there.

O'HIGGINS: Yes, but my gold stocks are up even more than that.

KANGAS: Well, that's true. That was the next thing I would mention. You gave us four gold stocks and, boy, they were winners. Let's have a look in review. We see Newmont Mining (NEM), which is the granddaddy of them all. It was then $24 back in March and now $42. That's up 73 percent. And then, of course, Gold Corp. has had a rise of about 60 percent. Then you had two other recommendations, Anglo Gold (AU) at $28 is now bordering $40. That's at 39 or almost 40 percent gain. And Gold Fields (GFI) was then $965. It's now $1,503. And that's a 50 percent gain. A lot better than the average did. So I compliment you on those fine recommendations.

O'HIGGINS: Thank you.

KANGAS: Do you still own the golds or have you taken some profits?

O'HIGGINS: No, I've stayed with them. Gold is still very cheap on a longer term basis. People forget that gold did very poorly for almost 20 years. And so it's just started to come back up after the last couple of years.

KANGAS: Why is it attractive to you?

O'HIGGINS: Well, for one thing, it's real money. And when you have the government threatening to print all the money it can to reflate the economy, you've got to -- and you have something that traditionally has had about a 10 to one relationship with the Dow -- in other words, the Dow has traded about 10 times gold -- right now as we speak the Dow is 26 times gold so.

KANGAS: So that's another reason. All right, now, so you think that the gold has a -- I mean, do you have a target price in mind over a certain time frame?

O'HIGGINS: Well, I think it depends on what -- actually, to tell you the truth, I think gold and the Dow could trade at the same price, which they did in 1980.

KANGAS: Good point.

O'HIGGINS: The Dow was 850 and gold was $850 an ounce. But, conservatively, I think that it could go to a long-term median average, which is 10 to one, which at today's price would put gold at, what, $970 or something like that, $960.

KANGAS: You know, there's something about gold that the major brokerages don't seem to like. You see very few of them recommending any gold stocks. One of the few market monitors that's on this program, Jim Dines, he's been a gold bug now for over a year and a half, two years.

O'HIGGINS: Right.

KANGAS: How come nobody wants to recommend gold except a few of you people out there in the wilderness?

O'HIGGINS: Well, for one thing, that makes me very happy. When people agree with me, that's when I get nervous.

KANGAS: I see.

O'HIGGINS: Especially the Wall Street firms. But gold is a -- it's a very narrow market. It's not a huge large capitalization and it's kind of a negative thing. Wall Street wants to be always optimistic.

KANGAS: A very good point.

O'HIGGINS: And in bad times they're kind of, you know, betting the wrong way. But that's how it is.

KANGAS: So, you still own the four that you recommended last time. Do you have any new suggestions?

O'HIGGINS: Well, I think the, these are -- some of these major stocks have moved so much that the real value is in the more smaller capitalization. But they're harder to buy. So I think people would be better off buying a good no load gold fund.

KANGAS: OK. We just have a minute left so let's have one of these recommendations.

O'HIGGINS: Well, Tocqueville Gold Fund (TGLDX) is one that I own personally. I also own Newmont personally in my own account.

KANGAS: OK. Tocqueville has had quite a rise, as most of the gold stocks. How about another one?

O'HIGGINS: And to short the market I'd use the Rydex Octos Fund, which goes up proportionately with the NASDAQ 100. As it goes down, this fund goes up.

KANGAS: OK.

O'HIGGINS: And then there's a -- bonds are cheap at the moment, so I'd use a Rydex Bond Fund and then I'd have 40 percent in cash, money market or Treasury bills.

KANGAS: And with these funds, of course, you're getting the advantage of a lot of diversification rather than just four stocks?

O'HIGGINS: Exactly. And no commissions, really so.

KANGAS: OK. So there you go. He still likes the gold and you own everything that we've mentioned.

O'HIGGINS: Yes, I do.

KANGAS: Well, I'm afraid our time is up. But we'll look in next time and see how you've done, about six months from now. Thanks very much, Michael.

O'HIGGINS: Thank you, Paul.

KANGAS: My guest market monitor this week was Michael O'Higgins, President of O'Higgins Asset Management.

XXX >>>> Streaming Video <<<< XXX


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bonds; boom; bubble; bust; crash; credit; currency; debt; deflation; depression; dollar; economy; fed; fraud; gold; inflation; investing; jobs; money; recession; silver; stockmarket
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
O'HIGGINS: Well, I think it depends on what -- actually, to tell you the truth, I think gold and the Dow could trade at the same price, which they did in 1980.

Wow, that would shake things up.

Richard W.

1 posted on 10/25/2003 12:04:14 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tauzero; Matchett-PI; Ken H; rohry; headsonpikes; RCW2001; blam; hannosh4LtGovernor; ...
FYI

Comments and opinions welcome.

Richard W.

2 posted on 10/25/2003 12:05:27 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
to tell you the truth, I think gold and the Dow could trade at the same price, which they did in 1980. They've been saying this all through the 1980s and 1990s --- and, as you know, it would've been a disaster to have listened to them.

He owns gold and wants to sell it to me -- -what else do you expect him to say?

3 posted on 10/25/2003 12:12:09 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
Gold had just been through the double digit Carter/Nixon inflation of the '80's. You would expect it to go through the roof while stocks were depressed.
4 posted on 10/25/2003 12:15:45 PM PDT by groanup (Whom the market gods humble they first make proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: groanup
You would expect it to go through the roof while stocks were depressed.

Well, I'm not sure how it will work out, but I'm long gold and silver and O'Higgins is not just another Wall Street shill. Jimmy Rogers has also been bullish on commodities so my guess is that people are reading "stagflation" in the future.

Richard W.

5 posted on 10/25/2003 12:44:26 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
He owns gold and wants to sell it to me -- -what else do you expect him to say?

O'Higgins is a world class investment manager. I doubt that he is interested in selling anything to you.

Richard W.

6 posted on 10/25/2003 12:46:58 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starwind
Got gold. Got silver. Got popcorn.

Richard W.

7 posted on 10/25/2003 12:48:10 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arete
O'Higgins is a world class investment manager. I doubt that he is interested in selling anything to you. What is the relationship between the caliber of the manager and his willingness to sell gold to me?

Also, how will he know that he did not sell it to me? Kindly explain.

8 posted on 10/25/2003 12:58:12 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: arete
Rogers has also been bullish on commodities so my guess is that people are reading "stagflation" in the future. Jimmy Rogers also predicted that IBM, after its decline, will never get back up again. "Mark my words," he said to Ron Insahna (sp?).
9 posted on 10/25/2003 1:01:18 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
I think that the article clearly states that he is a buyer and not a seller. I know that you are attempting to engage me in one of your circular illogical discussions, but I don't want to go down that road today.

Richard W.

10 posted on 10/25/2003 1:04:40 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
Contrarian ping.

Richard W.

11 posted on 10/25/2003 1:07:13 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Whenever paper currency gets into trouble, people run to gold. 6000 years of recorded history has to count for something.
12 posted on 10/25/2003 1:16:44 PM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: arete
I think that the article clearly states that he is a buyer No, the article says he is an owner of gold. Which means he will sell at some point what he owns.

Given your response, I will say more directly that your remark of him not wanting to sell anything to me was ridiculous. Firstly, if I buy gold on the other side of the deal with him, how will he even know whom he sold to (not that he should care)? You should know that, or at least have learned before making investments.

Secondly, you implied that he was a world-class manager and I am not in his category. You may not like my posts, but what do you know about my past, for instance; how do you know that I did not do time on Wall Street managing money?

I know that you are attempting to engage me in your circular illogical discussions

Firstly, I did not attempt anything --- I don't even know who you are and don't remember your name.

Secondly, and more importantly, being a person who makes more mistakes than there are words in a sentence, you are not in a position to judge someone else's logic.

Happy investing, and have a good day.

13 posted on 10/25/2003 1:22:58 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Two words -- anger management.

Richard W.

14 posted on 10/25/2003 1:26:28 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
I don't even know who you are and don't remember your name.

I can see how that happens when you make a habbit of trolling so many threads with a flame-thrower.

15 posted on 10/25/2003 1:44:41 PM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: arete
Me, too! LOL!
16 posted on 10/25/2003 2:56:34 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arete
jimmy rogers was pushing that idea all through the middle 90s. then he took a vacation, came back with the same tune. he has some winners and losers, but he basically has his eyes focused on raw materials not value added.
17 posted on 10/25/2003 3:23:30 PM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Me, too! LOL!

Interesting that O'Higgins recommends holding so much cash. Must be a hedge.

Richard W.

18 posted on 10/25/2003 3:48:22 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: arete
"O'Higgins is a world class investment manager."

Careful. Remember all those "world class" Nobel prize winners that blew up Long Term Capital Management? Read my tag line. There is no such thing as a "world class" investment manager. Monkeys do just as well throwing darts.

19 posted on 10/25/2003 4:00:12 PM PDT by groanup (Whom the market gods humble they first make proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: groanup
You can say that again. No sure things. He's also hedging with cash which seems prudent.

Richard W.

20 posted on 10/25/2003 4:22:34 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson