Skip to comments.
50 Reasons Lord of the Rings Sucks
Pointless Waste of Time ^
Posted on 12/22/2002 9:05:26 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
50 Reasons why
LORD OF THE RINGS
sucks
- Fellowship of the Rings was shoved down our throats.
I've heard some students are even forced to read some novelization of the movie in their literature classes. Ridiculous. Does Hollywood run our classrooms now?
- Greed.
Hollywood can't make a movie these days without crapping out a sequel the next year to squeeze more money out of the sheep. Guess what; there's ANOTHER LOTR movie coming this Christmas. Gee, I wonder what will bring Rocky out of retirement this time?
- Quality Control at New Line.
Millions of copies of the LOTR DVD have thick black bars at the bottom and top of the screen throughout the film. Didn't anyone catch this? You know what happens at the end, in the extreme foreground and extreme upper sky? Neither do I. Bush league, guys.
- They switched Darrens on us!
Look closely and you'll notice the human member of their party is played by two different actors at different points of the movie (it takes a sharp eye to notice, but one of them has red hair, one black).
- Quality Control at New Line, II.
In the massive Mt. Doom battle scene at the beginning of Fellowship of the Ring, a DVD pause reveals at least half a dozen of the 50,000 Orc Warrior extras are wearing modern tennis shoes.
- Speaking of Orcs...
The Orcs were obviously stolen from PC game maker Blizzard and its Warcraft series. Too bad Blizzard is apparently too scared to sue New Line over it.
- Racism.
Percentage of protagonists in Fellowship who are white: 100. Meanwhile the black antagonists and their black crow spies and their black glass seeing ball inhabit their black towers and perform black magic. Gosh, I wonder if there's some symbolism there?
- Gold: The Stretchy Element.
The ring, which is seen to be at least two inches in diameter at the beginning to fit the polish sausage-sized finger of Sauron, suddenly fits Frodo's child-sized finger later. I guess this movie takes place in a world where rings magically change sizes on their own.
- Violence.
Give me one reason that story couldn't have been told without all the fighting.
- Horse sense.
Why didn't they take horses on their quest? Or even better, why didn't Gandalf's giant flying bird friend haul them into Mordor? Watch out, Frodo! All of your methods of transportation have been swallowed by the Dark Lord of the Plot Hole!
- Retracted.*
See below.
- Return of the Living Dead.
If you watch closely during the Inn scene, Frodo and his crew are shown getting stabbed by the Ring Wraiths. Then, five seconds later, they are fine again. Note to the director: try proofreading your movie before you release it to the public.
- Did someone say plot hole?
Liv Tyler's character is seen easily defeating nine strong supernatural beings, even though she is clearly a woman.
- The Battle Droid Syndrome.
The mutated muscular soldiers of Mordor turned out to be hilariously ineffective soldiers, a dozen of them held off by a single dying human. Apparently they made the beasts by crossing Orcs, Goblins and the French.
- Sloppy CGI.
Gandalf's smoke boat is pretty impressive, but smoke cannot be made to travel horizontally, thus revealing it to be nothing but a cheap special effect.
- The Asbestos Wizard.
We all saw Gandalf fall into the molten core of Middle Earth after his battle with the firebeast thing. Well, I guess the Gandalf action figure must have sold well, because in the slap-together sequel coming up this year Gandalf is back. I wonder if they'll even bother to explain it. Maybe he'll be resurrected via voodoo, a la the corpse in Weekend at Bernie's II (look closely and you'll notice LOTR steals several elements from the WAB films).
- Invisible Implausibility.
Every time Frodo or Bilbo went invisible with the ring they should have also gone BLIND. Your eyes cannot function unless light is reflected off the cornea. If light passes through it (as must be the case with invisibility) sight is no longer possible. Also, rings do not turn you invisible.
- The Asbestos Wizard, II.
The giant fire beast thing at the end was breathing a firey breath hot enough to send heat-distortion waves through the air. The sheer temperature of the air should have burned off Gandalf's beard and eyebrows. None of my reading on evolutionary biology reveals a single reason why a particular race of humans would develop unflammable facial hair as this would provide practically no advantage in either survival or mating.
- I'll have to rent that one.
The rushed-through story the screenwriter threw in as the first ten minutes of Fellowship of the Ring looked a lot more interesting than the movie we were forced to watch. Why didn't somebody make a movie off that instead?
- Magic Mechanics.
Experts on the occult say in order for a wizard to floorspin a fully-grown man like Gandalf, he'd need three magical staffs, not two.
- Finders, keepers.
So Bilbo, who we are supposed to identify with as a protagonist, finds a piece of someone else's jewelry and just keeps it for himself? That's funny, because I would expect a good man to submit it to the local Lost and Found so it could be claimed by its owner. It makes me wonder if he bought that hillside house or if he was just squatting.
- Go-Go Gadget Arrow Sprouter.
Legolas shoots arrow after arrow at his enemies, and yet the number of arrows in his quiver never decreases. I guess elves have glands on their back that secrete arrows.
- Watch out! He's going to explode!
The heroes are shown eating again and again, and yet no one ever goes to the bathroom throughout their entire quest.
- Meesa gonna make theesa movie suckah!
The character of Gollum in The Two Towers will be entirely computer animated, in a cheap effort to cash in on Jar Jar Binks Mania. Thank you, Peter Jackson. Thank you right to Hell.
- Propaganda.
The Elves, clearly the most advanced and wise species, are also clearly gay.
- Speaking of Elves...
Elves are beautiful and wise and tall? Great warriors? Makers of fine lightweight weapons? Our modern knowledge of elves has observed only an ability to make cookies and toys. All the elves in the film are portrayed as living in a warm paradise (Rivendell) but our own information tells us the aforementioned group of toymaking elves work and thrive in the arctic. Hey, Mr. Jackson: Research is half of writing.
- Homage or theft?
The "happy village of little people" idea was stolen from Willow.
- Homage or theft II?
The wise old wizard character was stolen from Harry Potter.
- Homage or theft III?
The "travelling on our quest through a corn field" scene was stolen from Shrek.
- Homage or theft IV?
The character of the rebellious-but-helpful Ranger was stolen from Val Kilmer in Willow.
- Homage or theft V?
The concept of the violent dwarf was based on Al Pacino.
- Homage or theft VI?
The "old man looking through the door hatch at the approaching little people" scene was stolen from A Clockwork Orange.
- Homage or theft VII?
The cantina scene with a noisy bar filled with a mix of otherworldly species was stolen from Cecile B. DeMille's One Night in an Alien Bar.
- Homage or theft VIII?
The incident with the flock of evil magical spying crows serving the All-Seeing Eye was based on an actual incident.
- Homage or theft IX?
The character of the Giant Evil Flaming All-Seeing Eye was based on former President Jimmy Carter.
- Homage or theft X?
The character of Elrond was based on Agent Smith from The Matrix.
- Weighty issues.
AKA "Plot Hole No. 273." Even with all that walking and light eating, the character of Sam only got fatter.
- Realism, schmealism.
Liv Tyler's immortal elf volunteers to give up her eternal life for a single romance with a human man. Could any man really be that well endowed? I find it unlikely.
- Hair Today, Gone Tomorrow.
The most advanced civilization is that of the elves, which are long-haired, new-age types? Sorry, Mr. Jackson, but modern science has proven that in any modern civilization, hippies would be extinct.
- Too many notes.
No movie should be over two hours long. Did we need that whole thing in the mine? Didn't it seem like they were just adding pointless scenes in the middle to pad it? It's like they decided beforehand they wanted three hours and used filler to flesh it out.
- Too many notes, II.
I just want to re-emphasize the above point. There is no reason entertainment can't be concise.
- Too many notes, III.
Too many characters to keep track of. The dwarf was clearly only there as a token dwarf character to sell tickets to lucrative movie-going dwarf demographic. Lose him.
- Rationalization for violence.
Why is the black octopus creature painted as the bad guy when it attacks, when one of the fellowship had clearly been throwing rocks at it?
- The Shoeless Land.
The Hobbits both 1) refuse to wear shoes and 2) run a livestock-based farming economy. Wouldn't they constantly be stepping in crap? Why doesn't the movie address this issue?
- Casting.
Why couldn't Frodo have been played by Christopher Walken?
- Casting, II.
Why couldn't Gandalf have been played by Bruce Campbell?
- Casting, III.
Why couldn't Bilbo have been played by Vin Diesel?
- Casting, IV.
Why couldn't the Ranger have been played by a monkey?
- The Score.
The background music wasn't nearly funky enough for me.
- What's that smell?
As bad as the Lucasfilm leaks were last year, the filmmakers of The Two Towers already have the novelization out in paperback. I've seen it at Barnes & Noble already. As if we needed any less of a reason to go see it.
*RETRACTED REASONS LORD OF THE RINGS SUCKS:
11. Damn you, gravity!
The giant firebeast thing is defeated by Gandalf when he destroys the bridge, sending the creature plunging to its death... despite the fact that it has wings.
This was retracted when a reader pointed out that the wings, like the rest of the beast, were made of shadow and fire and thus would be useless for flight. Thanks for the tip!
TOPICS: Books/Literature; Humor; TV/Movies; The Hobbit Hole
KEYWORDS: 5000dailyvanities; agentsmithrules; allseeingeye; bestthreadever; bilboandroidash; freeshelob; frodolives; funimpaired; gollumrules; growhemp; humor; humorchallenged; legolasmajorhottie; loserslovelotr; lotrsucks; peterjacksonissexy; preciousssss; ripvanitywinkle; ripvanwinkle; sarumandooku; satire; shutupidiot; stfu; stupidfairytale; tolkien; whatyearisthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-238 next last
To: A.J.Armitage
Hmmmm....guess I'm glad I didn't read the books first. I LOVED IT--will go see it again, too!
To: A.J.Armitage
Go-Go Gadget Arrow Sprouter. Legolas shoots arrow after arrow at his enemies, and yet the number of arrows in his quiver never decreases. I guess elves have glands on their back that secrete arrows.
Congratulations! I was drinking tea and I aspirated while laughing!
Great satire! You missed the fact that Gandalf caught his sword on the way down. Of course, as any physicist knows, a sword has a higher terminal velocity than a human, or Maia--he should have never caught it.
But that was a nice fix for the problem that Gandalf never dropped it in the book. I wondered in TFOTR how PJ was going to fix that, since I knew Gandalf used the sword (Glamdring, the Foe Hammer--as any Hobbit reader knows) to defeat the Balrog.
I was also disturbed the Balrog did not fly, either in the book or in the movie. The only explanation was that there was not enough room for its wings to unfurl. That also explains why the two did not squish at the bottom.
For those who didn't read the book, Gandalf and the Balrog fought from the subterranean lake to the tallest peak by climbing the Endless Stair. PJ alluded to that by having the faint sounds of their battle on the sound track while the camera panned up the mountain. Naturally, no one noticed that, on this thread.
To: A.J.Armitage
# 19. Good question.
# 38. Very good question.
:^)
103
posted on
12/23/2002 6:13:28 AM PST
by
Argh
To: A.J.Armitage
Some of these replies are funnier than the "review"! Thanks for the laugh.
104
posted on
12/23/2002 6:14:20 AM PST
by
shezza
To: motzman
Basically, wood elves are usually blond while the Rivendell elves were darker haired.
Pretty much, yep. It's why I'm not blonde again yet.
To: A.J.Armitage
Finally someone posted an anti-LOTR rant that makes sense.
Not like all those nit-picky rants focusing on trivium from people who feel they have to attack what other people love.
Thanks, and Shalom.
106
posted on
12/23/2002 6:25:05 AM PST
by
ArGee
To: Vic3O3; cavtrooper21
Great Satire. Read through the whole post, it only gets better!
Semper Fi
107
posted on
12/23/2002 6:26:10 AM PST
by
dd5339
To: Hugin
Aw, those lovable characters...Dildo, Spam, Moxie and Pepsi. Legolam and Gimlet, and Arrowshirt son of Arrowroot. Who could forget? Ahhh Bored of the Rings - a true Classic
I sit in the corner and pick my nose
And think of dirty things
Like Deviant Dwarves that suck there toes
And Elves that drub their dings
-- Ancient Hobbitt ditty sung by Dildo Bugger to his nephew Frito Lay
108
posted on
12/23/2002 6:27:06 AM PST
by
commish
To: ksen
Ping!
109
posted on
12/23/2002 6:31:14 AM PST
by
malakhi
To: paulklenk
I thought it was a very humurous, tongue-in-cheek article. Others here thought the same.
Of course, lacking your superior intellect (and overt superiority in general), we are often amused by the sublime. What fools we must be!
110
posted on
12/23/2002 6:41:33 AM PST
by
Ignatz
To: Cagey
LOL....
111
posted on
12/23/2002 6:42:16 AM PST
by
Sungirl
To: A.J.Armitage
They were two different people, Aragorn and Boromir. This writer is a complete nimrod.
112
posted on
12/23/2002 6:45:05 AM PST
by
Junior
To: A.J.Armitage
#38 Liv Tyler's immortal elf volunteers to give up her eternal life for a single romance with a human man. Could any man really be that well endowed? I find it unlikely.
#25 The Elves, clearly the most advanced and wise species, are also clearly gay.
I guess this guy should proof read his own list. Liv Tylers character is clearly one frustrated woman.
113
posted on
12/23/2002 6:51:40 AM PST
by
BobinIL
To: A.J.Armitage
Millions of copies of the LOTR DVD have thick black bars at the bottom and top of the screen throughout the film. Didn't anyone catch this? You know what happens at the end, in the extreme foreground and extreme upper sky? Neither do I. Bush league, guys. Umm... Pardon me for pointing this out, but that's a thing called "letterbox format." Serious cinephiles know what it is, and why it exists.
114
posted on
12/23/2002 7:04:04 AM PST
by
Oberon
To: Ciexyz
Why then is Liv Tyler dark-haired? Because she's the illegitimate result of her elvish mother's years spent as an Aerosmith groupie?
115
posted on
12/23/2002 7:07:58 AM PST
by
Oberon
To: A.J.Armitage
Give me one reason that story couldn't have been told without all the fighting.
Anyone who could complain about the novelization of the movie and this is obviously doing his arguing for reasons other than what he's stated. This reminds me of some reviewer saying that the "gentle medievalist" Tolkien would probably have been shocked at the level of violence in the Helm's Deep battle scene. Another person who hasn't read the book. There was actually very little graphic violence in the Helm's Deep battle scene. There was a lot of motion and implied violence, but when the occasional head was struck off, there was no slow-motion spouting of arterial gore. I thought the depiction of mayhem was very restrained and never became gratuitous.
If you should complain about anything, it should be that the palantir were too tiny or that Gollum's outfit was absurd. Either he wore nothing or he wore scavanged clothing for protection against the weather. No one would believe that a creature whose only goals were possessing his Precious and killing those who had taken it from him would have any sense of genital modesty. An outfit of tattered rags would have been more believable than a skimpy, yet undestructable, loin cloth. But then it may have been much more difficult to convincingly digitally animate many folds and tatters of clothing than a smooth surface. And though Smeagol's movement was pretty good, it looked as though he and the Hobbits were interacting with the gravity of two different planets.
As far as racism is concerned. Ha ha ha ha ha. Since the orcs are not human their darkness has nothing to do with race. I suppose you could say that Darkness was associated with Evil and Light with Good, but, if anything, that's a pretty universal archetype (though in China white is a symbol of death). At the same time throughout the world's folklore there have been descriptions of the seemingly beautiful which is evil and of the apparently ugly which is good (such as the description of the Messiah in Isaiah).
116
posted on
12/23/2002 7:08:30 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: A.J.Armitage
Though the 50 reasons is a pretty good satire on debunkers.
117
posted on
12/23/2002 7:09:56 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: A.J.Armitage
Millions of copies of the LOTR DVD have thick black bars at the bottom and top of the screen throughout the film.
Ha ha ha. Good one. I wonder for those reading the thread what the average number of seconds was before they realized the satiric nature of the 50 reasons. Thanks.
118
posted on
12/23/2002 7:13:00 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: Wrigley; drstevej
Just wait till the Hobbit's Hole crowd sees this.You rang? ;^)
119
posted on
12/23/2002 7:26:21 AM PST
by
ksen
To: angelo
Thanks for the ping angelo. This is very funny. ;^)
120
posted on
12/23/2002 7:29:04 AM PST
by
ksen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-238 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson