Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge rules Trump admin can't prevent people from using food stamps for junk food
notthebee.com ^ | Jun 24, 2026 | Wolfgang Ramsay

Posted on 06/24/2026 8:11:37 AM PDT by V_TWIN

People are allowed to poison themselves with junk food AND you have to pay for it!

At least that's the latest from our federal courts.

A federal judge on Monday blocked the Trump administration from allowing five states to ban the purchase of sugary drinks and candy with food stamps.

The decision is a major setback for Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s "Make America Healthy Again" movement, known as MAHA, which is focused on minimizing the consumption of ultraprocessed foods to reduce the prevalence of chronic diseases such as obesity and diabetes.

Sorry, taxpayers must continue to fund the Kool-Aid pineapples.

Judge Amy (the person apparently in charge of the country) demands it!

US District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in the District of Columbia ruled that the US Department of Agriculture lacked the authority to approve state waivers in pilot projects in Colorado, Iowa, Nebraska, Tennessee and West Virginia.

In their waivers, the states sought to change the federal definition of food to one that restricted certain products. The bans differed somewhat in each state, with all limiting the purchase of sugary drinks, such as soda and energy beverages, and some also restricting candy. The limits applied to all SNAP recipients, with no exceptions allowed.

(Excerpt) Read more at notthebee.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: CIB-173RDABN

Its just the principle....they’re just trying to be the biggest PITA as possible.


41 posted on 06/24/2026 9:16:37 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America....so great even the people that hate it won't leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Federal judge rules Trump admin can't prevent people from using food stamps for junk food

That is not in the United States Constitution.

42 posted on 06/24/2026 9:17:43 AM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

“Personally I don’t care where food stamp recipients get their calories from - healthy or not is their choice.”

We’re obviously dealing with someone who makes bad choices in life. If I wasn’t on the hook to pay their healthcare, they could eat razor blades for all I care.


43 posted on 06/24/2026 9:18:45 AM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Should I buy the Twinkies or the Moon Pie? I can’t decide.


44 posted on 06/24/2026 9:27:11 AM PDT by ComputerGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

You’d be surprised (maybe not) at the foreign grifter scum who are getting tens of thousands of dollars at our expense, using the EBT scam to buy soft drinks and candy bars, and selling them on sidewalk kiosks. The fraud and abuse is staggering.


45 posted on 06/24/2026 9:27:25 AM PDT by LouAvul (Cleaning your home with a dog in the house is like brushing your teeth while eating Oreos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Why can’t we have some conservative district judge somewhere passing pronouncements? How would the USSC rule if a judge had the fortitude to say “It’s not in the constitution, so it’s up to the states or the people”


46 posted on 06/24/2026 9:45:33 AM PDT by not in the club
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
What's to keep congress dictating to the rest of us....

Because the rest of us earn actual money and aren't receiving government vouchers intended to prevent people from starving. If we want to give vouchers that are only good for buying potatoes, that's fine because it isn't even their money in the first place.

47 posted on 06/24/2026 9:54:15 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

“Yo. Ding dong. Yo!”


48 posted on 06/24/2026 10:04:34 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Talarico is Italian for "heretic".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

The Jackson ho AGAIN. We’ve got to do something about all these Feral, angry female, America-hating skanks trying to run the country. None of these bags and fags were elected. It’s time for them all to go. Defund the Judicial branch. It wasn’t intended to be like this with all the former Omelette Warehouse waitresses and Taco Shack waitress making all these idiot decisions.


49 posted on 06/24/2026 10:10:14 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (No Kings in America! Defund and Abolish the Feral DemonRAT Judiciary NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Of course good food is better than poor food, but dictating what people can eat, even if we are paying for it, is socia engineering.


50 posted on 06/24/2026 10:38:57 AM PDT by Pirate Ragnar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; lightman

“Beer is liquid bread.” Falsely attributed to Martin Luther, but true nevertheless!


51 posted on 06/24/2026 10:41:21 AM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Finally, some common sense being applied here. Thank you!


52 posted on 06/24/2026 10:58:54 AM PDT by Fireone (1. Avoid crowds 2.Head on a swivel 3.Be prepared to protect & defend those around you 4.Avoid crowds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dan Zachary
You will care when you have to pay for their healthcare.

I think the more likely scenario is that liberals will claim that healthy food costs more than cheap junk food and use that as an excuse to increase food stamp benefits. In fact, I'm certain that's what will happen.
53 posted on 06/24/2026 11:33:13 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Carl’s Jr and McDonalds hit hardest?.

EBT (Electronic Benefits Transfer) cards need to be isued by weight of holder?.

Happy health to you ensues?.


54 posted on 06/24/2026 11:39:01 AM PDT by Vaduz (NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pirate Ragnar

I agree, the government shouldn’t engage in social engineering, like taking my money to pay for someone else’s food.


55 posted on 06/24/2026 11:42:50 AM PDT by armydoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Why not fire 535 legislators and hand over control of the federal government to 890 Article III judges (those appointed for life by a President).

Save a lot of money!


56 posted on 06/24/2026 11:56:33 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

But what about Meth?

Everyone in Tacoma needs it more than food.


57 posted on 06/24/2026 12:05:35 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (8% of humans are White Males. 90% of Nobel Prizes (excluding “Peace”) have been won by White Males.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

It’s spending... authorized by Congress. 100% constitutional.

That said, we have a long history of having executive branch agencies writing the rules of implementation of such programs. I highly doubt original legislation was so detailed as to prevent HHS from making these kinds of low-level decisions.


58 posted on 06/24/2026 12:26:30 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

AND you have to pay for their medical care when they get chronic diseases at 30 from their junk food diet...


59 posted on 06/24/2026 12:30:38 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (You can vote totalitarians in but you can never vote them out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Your experience was a nice one, a reminder of true things.


60 posted on 06/24/2026 2:27:38 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson