Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Supreme Court found that the government illegally charged hundreds of J6ers with a 20-year felony. Every American should be livid about that! (TRANSCRIPT of 1 minute video remarks by President Trump re $1.776 billion fund)
x.com ^ | May 18, 2026 | @FreeStateWill

Posted on 05/19/2026 7:38:21 PM PDT by ransomnote

ransomnote: President Trump and his family dropped their claim to monetary compensation for their lawsuit in order to provide the money for this J'6er fund.



@FreeStateWill

The Supreme Court found that the government illegally charged hundreds of J6ers with a 20-year felony. Every American should be livid about that!

If you don't support restitution for those whom the government illegally damaged, you are anti-American!

May 18, 2026

 

~~~TRANSCRIPT BEGINS

Reporter: The Justice Department has this new fund that was announced today - $1.7 billion. Why should the tax payers pay for the January 6'ers?

President Trump: Well, it's been very well received; I have to tell you. I know very little about it. I wasn't involved in the whole creation of it, and the negotiation.

But this is re-imbursing people that were horribly treated, horribly treated. It's anti-weaponization. They've been weaponized, and they've been, in some cases, imprisoned wrongly. They paid legal fees that they didn't have. They've gone bankrupt. Their lives have been destroyed, and they turned out to be right.

I mean, it was a terrible period of time in the history of our country, and they worked on it. I know the Justice Department has really been working on it very hard. There's been numerous ocaisions over the years where things like this have been done, but these were people that were weaponized and reallly treated brutally by a system that was so corrupt, with corrupt people running it, and they're getting re-imbursed for their legal fees and the other things that they had to suffer.

~~~TRANSCRIPT ENDS

 

https://x.com/GeriPerna/status/2056537981402386701 

Geri Perna
@GeriPerna


She says 1.7 billion as if that is enough to compensate over 1600 people. Many spent years in prison, many lost their life savings, retirements, careers, and are unable to find employment. Several were denied medical treatment and died because if it. My nephew Matthew Perna killed himself along with 4 others. That number is not exclusive to just J6ers...it simply isn't enough.
May 18, 2026

GROK's response to ransomnote's query:

Yes, the actual award amount for the fund is $1.776 billion.
 
justice.gov
This figure comes directly from the U.S. Department of Justice announcement and related settlement documents. It is drawn from the federal Judgment Fund (a permanent appropriation for settling claims against the government) as part of resolving Trump's $10 billion IRS lawsuit over the unauthorized leak of his tax returns. Trump and his co-plaintiffs (Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization) receive a formal apology but no direct monetary damages; they dropped their suit and other claims in exchange for creating this fund.
 
justice.gov
Official DocumentationThe fund is overseen by a five-member commission, processes claims through ~December 2028 (with any remainder reverting to the government), and is open to claims of government "weaponization/lawfare" (no explicit partisan test mentioned in the announcement).
 
justice.gov
Conservative Media CoverageHere are details from a few conservative-leaning outlets:The $1.776 billion figure (a nod to 1776) is consistently reported across sources as the fund's capitalization. Coverage often frames it as redress for alleged overreach, while critics call it a potential slush fund.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: fund; j6; jan6; politicalprisoners

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Blue Highway

The perpetrators of this horrible fascism need to be sued into homelessness. And imprisoned.

Only way to stop them short of hanging.


21 posted on 05/20/2026 3:45:54 AM PDT by Chickensoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter

I agree with you. Those people were imprisoned, often in solitary confinement and in cells that were scheduled to close due to mold and water leaks.

They were denied basic human rights, some were not actually charged or convicted for several years. Those that were convicted found themselves in kangaroo courts. Attorneys were scared to defend them because doing c=so would cost them their careers.

They deserve every penny of this and anyone, from court clerks on up who participated in this perversion of justice need to be hunted down and prosecuted.


22 posted on 05/20/2026 4:12:35 AM PDT by cyclotic (Don’t be part of the problem. Be the entire problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Weird how quiet the MSM is on all this. Why it’s almost as if they were willing co-conspirators in the illegal prosecutions.


23 posted on 05/20/2026 4:16:55 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee
Weird how quiet the MSM is on all this. Why it’s almost as if they were willing co-conspirators in the illegal prosecutions.

They were willing participants. The MSM (including Fox News) were all too willing to paint the J6er people as insurrectionists. That was the buzzword they jammed down everyone's throat and places like MSNBC/MSNOW and CNN will still use that verbiage.

24 posted on 05/20/2026 4:29:21 AM PDT by Blue Highway ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

NPR was on it this morning. See, the so-called restitution is just a slush fund to reward MAGA types, despite their criminality, along with Trump’s attempt to overthrow the 2020 election.

Yeah, willing co-conspirators.


25 posted on 05/20/2026 5:42:15 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

The real crime is the entire false flag operation of the DEMONcratic “party” and its judicial operatives. I WANT THESE PEOPLE IN PRISON OR EXECUTED!


26 posted on 05/20/2026 5:47:29 AM PDT by The Truth Will Make You Free ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

“the relevant SCOTUS ruling was made in June 2024, nearly two years ago, so the headline and the X post are all complete bullshit except for the restitution part ...”


I hate it when people post old Supreme Court cases as “Breaking News” while at the same time misrepresenting the actual application of the Court’s opinion. Others that do not know any better then repost the comment and it spreads like wildfire.

Speaking of SCOTUS, the court will be releasing opinions at 10 tomorrow morning. I’ll start the thread around 9:45 a.m. We have 33 pending decisions for this term.

https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/term/ot2025/


27 posted on 05/20/2026 6:04:54 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Retribution must be the death penalty

Such action destroys the fabric of the Republic and must be a capital crime


28 posted on 05/20/2026 6:13:47 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. +12) Quid Quid Nominatur Fabricatur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

The Supreme Court found that the government illegally charged hundreds of J6ers with a 20-year felony.
~~~~~

Where are the prison sentences for these civil rights violations?


29 posted on 05/20/2026 8:12:36 AM PDT by nagant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Segovia

It is drawn from the federal Judgment Fund (a permanent appropriation for settling claims against the government) as part of resolving Trump’s $10 billion IRS lawsuit over the unauthorized leak of his tax returns. Trump and his co-plaintiffs (Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization) receive a formal apology but no direct monetary damages; they dropped their suit and other claims in exchange for creating this fund.
....

This looks like one term of surrender that your govt has had to put in place because of the long train of abuses and usurpations that’s been happening, especially since Trump came down an escalator.


30 posted on 05/20/2026 8:42:59 AM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. N. Wolfe

In a sane world, Congress should pass a bill dissolving the DC Circuit Court and the DC District courts and transferring the jurisdiction of those courts to a different region (without transferring the so-called judges and disbarring them and cancelling their pensions.


31 posted on 05/20/2026 8:59:47 AM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: delchiante

Poster is anti trump pretty much therefore J6 not on his radar much
A purist

We have a few here


32 posted on 05/20/2026 9:01:36 AM PDT by wardaddy (If u hate Trump you’re stupid or clueless what’s going on We’re fighting for our civilization s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Yeah, I spotted it with their comment..

Not actually complaining about the abuse is a tell they can’t hide.


33 posted on 05/20/2026 9:10:31 AM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I remember watching live as the temporary fence marking ‘no trespassing’ area was taken down just as the crowd located 1/8th mi away turned in that direction. That was all the tell I needed to see a setup.


34 posted on 05/20/2026 11:34:29 AM PDT by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Who’ll swing for it or face prison time? Oh that’s right, nobody!


35 posted on 05/20/2026 12:42:04 PM PDT by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cport

I might cut her a little slack.

Her “dissent” was on procedural grounds. The decision was safely
affirmed and Barrett knew that her dissent would not change the
outcome.


36 posted on 05/20/2026 12:54:02 PM PDT by T. Rustin Noone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: T. Rustin Noone

What, to make it look more bi-partisan? Marching orders from Roberts


37 posted on 05/20/2026 2:30:37 PM PDT by cport (How can political capital be spent on a bunch of ingrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson