Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Man's Bones Kept Washing Up on the Beach for Decades. Investigators Finally ID'd Him 181 Years After He Vanished
Daily Galaxy ^ | May 13, 2026 | Arezki Amiri

Posted on 05/13/2026 9:37:49 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

In 1995, a human skull emerged from the Atlantic Ocean and landed on a beach in Longport, New Jersey. More bones followed over the next 18 years, surfacing across three different Jersey Shore towns. For three decades, investigators called the unidentified remains "Scattered Man John Doe." Now, genetic genealogy researchers have given him back his name: Captain Henry Goodsell, a 29-year-old schooner commander who died in a winter storm 181 years ago.

The identification, confirmed in April 2025 and announced by the Ramapo College of New Jersey's Investigative Genetic Genealogy Center in May, marks one of the oldest cold cases ever resolved through forensic DNA analysis. Goodsell spent more years as an unnamed set of bones than he ever did as a living man...

"A death certificate was issued for Goodsell more than 180 years after he died," the IGG Center noted in its case resolution announcement on May 21, 2025. The family, located through DNA matching, declined to take possession of the remains. They will stay in a state repository indefinitely.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailygalaxy.com ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: ancientautopsies; captainhenrygoodsell; coldcase; dna; genealogy; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; henrygoodsell; newjersey

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Undergraduate students at the Ramapo College of New Jersey were able to link the three bones to the same person – Captain Henry Goodsell.
Image credit: Ramapo College of New Jersey
Image credit: Ramapo College of New Jersey

1 posted on 05/13/2026 9:37:49 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
Thanks for the link!

2 posted on 05/13/2026 9:38:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (TDS -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

If a death certificate wasn’t issued, was he still registered to vote in NJ?


3 posted on 05/13/2026 9:42:32 PM PDT by Fai Mao ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

😂


4 posted on 05/13/2026 9:44:00 PM PDT by antceecee ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“The family, located through DNA matching, declined to take possession of the remains. They will stay in a state repository indefinitely.”

The family probably didn’t want to have to pay for cremation or burial. I wonder if for some legal reason the state needs to hold on to them - or can they just give them a pauper’s burial?


5 posted on 05/13/2026 9:51:28 PM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant - Never Fearful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

Probably be in a museum collection but not on display. It’s not unlikely that the family had never heard of the man and at age 29 he had no children, so, a collateral line at best. And some people just have no interest in genealogy.


6 posted on 05/13/2026 9:53:32 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (TDS -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

Perhaps just hold onto them for studying. I’m sure they realized early on that these were very old bones, and the DNA stuff was just something to do and experiment with, rather than trying to solve a crime or cause some benefit.


7 posted on 05/13/2026 9:54:04 PM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant - Never Fearful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Probably be in a museum collection but not on display. It’s not unlikely that the family had never heard of the man and at age 29 he had no children, so, a collateral line at best. And some people just have no interest in genealogy.

The story mentions Goodsell was married and had three children. Presuming they lived until adulthood, he probably does have some direct descendants out there. They just don't care about him. If it was my ancestor, even if I never knew or heard of the guy, I'd do all I could to ensure he had a decent burial no matter how humble. I would hope my descendants would do the same for me in a similar situation.

8 posted on 05/13/2026 10:21:28 PM PDT by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fidelis

I am with you.

Surprising outcome.


9 posted on 05/13/2026 10:23:33 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

😁 Now that he’s been identified, yes!


10 posted on 05/13/2026 10:52:01 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (TDS -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fidelis

Good catch — looks like he had a page on Findagrave before this identification:

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/283203608/henry-goodsell

His wife remarried 1850, had another child.


11 posted on 05/13/2026 10:58:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (TDS -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Very cool. Looks like someone will have to update that ‘Find A Grave’ entry.


12 posted on 05/13/2026 11:04:09 PM PDT by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fidelis

The widow’s page has this new information on it. I hope someone bothers to update the genealogical links for the Captain, those CT counties of his roots are familiar.


13 posted on 05/13/2026 11:35:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (TDS -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

https://www.wikitree.com/genealogy/GOODSELL


14 posted on 05/13/2026 11:37:01 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (TDS -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
[...] and at age 29 he had no children, so, a collateral line at best [...]

There you go, interpreting other times and older cultural mores through a modern lens!

In 1845, a 29-year-old schooner commander would probably have already sired multiple children - while a modern 29-year-old might still be living in his parents' basement!

Regards,

15 posted on 05/14/2026 12:03:14 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

As fidelis pointed out, he did indeed have three children, there’s a nice subthread above.


16 posted on 05/14/2026 12:15:51 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (TDS -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
As fidelis pointed out, he did indeed have three children, there’s a nice subthread above.

It was the notion that, in 1845, a 29-year-old schooner commander would "probably" be childless (a prime example of "presentism") that I was criticizing.

Regards,

17 posted on 05/14/2026 12:37:41 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

I found an old photo of me running a field crew - I was about 25 at the time. My 28 year-old daughter lamented “And what am I doing?” I told her times have changed. “Heck, Alexander the Great was probably 25 and creating his empire.”

I have no idea, but I know he was young by modern standards.


18 posted on 05/14/2026 12:44:57 AM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant - Never Fearful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
What is your 28-year-old daughter doing?

Regards,

19 posted on 05/14/2026 12:49:11 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

With the death certificate, he’s still registered to vote


20 posted on 05/14/2026 6:04:24 AM PDT by cableguymn (Can't cancel all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson