Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 04/18/2026 8:04:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Being told you have high cholesterol can feel like a verdict: start taking a statin or risk a heart attack or stroke.
Recent studies, however, suggest that high cholesterol is not as uniformly harmful as once thought. However, the message has swung hard in the other direction on social media, where claims range from “high cholesterol might save your life” to “high cholesterol is the secret to living to 100-plus.”
So, is high cholesterol really “good” or “bad”?
The reality is more nuanced than either extreme suggests. The more useful question may not be whether high cholesterol is harmful, but when—and in whom—it becomes risky.
Much of this internet discussion traces back to real research. A 2023 Swedish study followed older participants for 35 years and found that those with higher total cholesterol were more likely to live to 100. In a separate 2025 study, researchers found that adults aged 90 or older with LDL-C or “bad” cholesterol levels above 130 mg/dL lived longer than those with levels below that threshold—notable given that the American Heart Association considers an optimal LDL-C level to be at or below 100 mg/dL.
However, a 2023 study, which analyzed data from more than 4 million veterans ages 18 or older, offered a key caution. The higher rates of coronary heart disease deaths among older participants with low cholesterol levels appeared to reflect what researchers called “reverse causality,” a phenomenon in which the data seem to show that A causes B, when in reality it is B that causes A. In other words, a serious underlying illness may drive cholesterol down, not the other way around.
The researchers called this the cholesterol or “lipid paradox”—the counterintuitive observation that low LDL-C and total cholesterol levels are unexpectedly associated with poorer health outcomes in studies.
“My concern with the current ‘lipid paradox’ hypothesis is that, it is also known that very low cholesterol levels in the elderly (especially over 80 years old) is most often a marker of […] underlying chronic disease like cancer,” Dr. Marschall Runge, a cardiologist and former executive vice president for medical affairs at the University of Michigan, told The Epoch Times. “The reported studies supporting the ‘lipid paradox’ did not account for these variables.”
“Simply put, low cholesterol often reflects underlying illness, frailty, malnutrition, or chronic disease that independently increases mortality risk,” Dr. Eddie Hackler, a cardiologist in Atlanta, told The Epoch Times. In other words, higher cholesterol in older adults may mean they are disease-free or well-nourished, factors that independently lower the risk of death. That could explain the association between high cholesterol and longevity reported among older participants in studies. However, there is no evidence to discount the proof that high cholesterol increases the risk of heart disease in the general population, Runge noted. “For the vast majority of adults (young and middle-aged), high LDL cholesterol remains a primary driver of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and reduction of LDL cholesterol saves lives.”
Cholesterol became a dietary “villain” in 1953, when physiologist Ancel Keys introduced the lipid-heart hypothesis: the idea that high intakes of total fat, saturated fat, and dietary cholesterol lead to atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries).
Keys argued that reducing fat and cholesterol, and replacing saturated fat found in animal products with polyunsaturated fat from plant-based oils and fatty fish, could lower cholesterol and the risk of heart disease.
This led to a 1968 American Heart Association dietary recommendation that people eat less than 300 milligrams of dietary cholesterol per day and eat no more than three whole eggs per week, as eggs are a prominent dietary source of cholesterol.
However, later studies complicated that picture. While having high cholesterol increases the risk of heart disease, some clinical studies found that replacing saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat did not reduce heart disease death, and in some cases, mortality rates increased.
Additionally, studies have shown that for most people, eating dietary cholesterol (such as in eggs) does not significantly raise blood cholesterol or meaningfully affect heart disease risk.
Concerns about the pharmaceutical industry’s involvement in the fight against cholesterol have also triggered skepticism. Statins, which are cholesterol-lowering medications, became mainstream in the late 1990s and grew into a lucrative market. According to a 2022 report, the global statin market is expected to reach $15.2 billion by 2027.
Statins are typically used for people with LDL levels of 190 mg/dL or higher, or 70 to 189 mg/dL with diabetes or elevated cardiovascular risk. However, they carry side effects, prompting questions about whether the benefits outweigh the risks for all patients.
Cholesterol is a structural component of every cell in the body and helps preserve cell membrane integrity, according to Runge. It also benefits brain function. “The brain contains about 25 percent of the body’s cholesterol, which is crucial for synapse formation and nerve signal transmission.”
Cholesterol is also a building block for all steroid hormones, including cortisol, aldosterone, estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone. It helps the body produce vitamin D during sun exposure and is necessary for the liver to produce bile acids, which are essential for digesting fats and absorbing fat-soluble vitamins such as A, D, E, and K. “Suffice it to say, humans born with very low cholesterol levels can have any of a number of debilitating disorders,” Runge said.
Despite cholesterol’s benefits, high cholesterol levels can lead to plaque buildup in the veins and arteries. However, it’s a common misperception that cholesterol buildup “clogs” arteries like grease builds up in a drain. In reality, high cholesterol stimulates inflammation in arterial walls, which leads to plaque formation, he noted.
Existing inflammation or damage in arterial walls is also a driver of plaque buildup.
LDL particles, which carry cholesterol, circulate in the blood. If there are too many particles, or if the artery wall is damaged by smoking, high blood pressure, or other conditions, the LDL particles can penetrate and become trapped in the inner lining of the artery, Runge said. Once trapped, LDL particles undergo oxidation, a chemical process that triggers an immune response.
The body perceives these oxidized LDL particles as foreign invaders. The immune system then sends macrophages (white blood cells) to “eat” the particles.
“The macrophages gorge themselves on cholesterol until they become fat-laden ‘foam cells,’” Runge said. “These foam cells die and accumulate, forming a fatty streak. Smooth muscle cells migrate to cover this streak, forming a fibrous cap. This accumulation is the plaque.”
As plaque builds, it can narrow the artery and reduce or block blood flow, resulting in a stroke or heart attack. If the plaque becomes unstable and ruptures, it can trigger the formation of blood clots that block an artery and cause a heart attack or stroke.
Research suggests that statins may help lower heart disease risk because they decrease inflammation, in addition to lowering cholesterol, which may help reduce plaque formation.
High cholesterol is riskier for anyone who has already had a heart attack, stroke, or has been diagnosed with peripheral artery disease. It is also more concerning for those with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes or high blood pressure, as these conditions can damage blood vessels and the inner lining of arteries, making them more susceptible to plaque formation.
Additionally, chronic kidney disease can lead to distinct lipid abnormalities and raise cardiovascular risk.
Familial hypercholesterolemia, a hereditary condition that causes extremely high LDL cholesterol levels due to gene mutations, is a less common but significant risk factor for heart disease and heart disease-related death, Runge said. Patients with this condition should begin cholesterol-lowering treatment at an early age, before arterial damage has progressed.
People with high lipoprotein(a), a genetically inherited form of cholesterol, are another group at higher risk of heart disease, especially if they also have high total cholesterol levels.
An elevated 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score is another important factor, Hackler said. Doctors can determine a person’s 10-year and 30-year risk using tools such as the American Heart Association’s Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease EVENTs (PREVENT) calculator.
People with autoimmune conditions have a higher risk of heart disease in general, and high cholesterol compounds that risk. For example, people with lupus have a 50 percent greater risk of heart disease than those without the condition.
This is due to disease-related chronic inflammation, accelerated plaque build-up in the arteries, damage to the inner lining of the blood vessels, and the presence of specific antibodies that raise heart disease and stroke risk, studies suggest.
Smoking also raises risk, as chemicals in tobacco smoke can lower HDL, or “good,” cholesterol and damage the inner lining of the blood vessels, leading to plaque buildup, Runge said.
Because cholesterol-related risks vary widely from person to person, medical recommendations continue to evolve. What doesn’t change is the value of paying attention to your numbers—whether they are high or unusually low—and using them as a starting point for an honest conversation about lifestyle and heart health.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
I think I need a flowchart!
Schrodinger approves.
Yep, a multivariable analysis is sorely needed.
Wake up that Bayes guy too.
I was doing very well at beating my cholesterol number.
Then SOMEBODY came up with two numbers - “bad cholesterol” and “good cholesterol”. I asked “who assigns moral value to an inanimate object?”
Then my doctor told me my good cholesterol was “too good”. I asked what she would like it to do - rob a bank? Kick a dog? Pass bad checks?
That’s when I gave up on Paint By Numbers healthcare. I still try to do what I should but I no longer care if this number is too high or that number is too low. It’s all a big scam to separate us from our money.
The medical groups prefer it that way, because it makes more profit.
The doctors, however, are trying to apply a scientific analysis to the causes of heart disease but don't have the tools and data really needed to do so. As a consequence, they latch onto single cause correlations that are far too simplistic.
For example, I have two stents that were placed after chest pain under stress. My mother had two calcifications in exactly the same spot, but never got to the point of needing intervention. Her brother was thinner, served in the military and was always thin. He needed two bypass surgeries and lost his eyesight due to arteriosclerosis. My wife by contrast is thin, but has super high cholesterol levels but no heart disease.
Genetics, including sex differentiation, obviously play a huge role. So there are many, many factors involved.
Meanwhile, by pushing high-carb but low fat diets for decades, the medical community has inadvertently killed millions.
Here's why. Soltea directly lowers bad cholesterol. The magnesium remedies a common deficiency that causes damaging inflammation. The collagen peptides remedy a decline in collagen production due to aging and provides the raw material for repair of damage to the vascular system.
Three months after starting this regimen, my blood tests so surprised my doctor that he ran them twice to be sure. Instead of being put on a statin, I was told to keep it up because my test numbers were better than those of my doctor.
Terriric info. Will read when awake tomorrow,
What is a health influencer? Sounds like Tik Tok Tide pod eaters to me.
Anyone who calls themselves a scientist and claims to study cholesterol without mentioning the other critical factors is just pushing a particular drug therapy, meaning they are a drug salesman for statins.
Ping
Statins are the scam... There’s no link between high cholesterol and heart attacks or stokes. Dozens of studies have proven this out.
Rockingham, please tell more specifically the brand names, exact product names, dosages and frequency of what you’ve been taking. Links to specific product pages at Amazon would also help.
Sorry for the bother. Thanks for posting.
My family is stricken with genetically high cholesterol. We are also stricken with long longevity, with many family members living healthily into their late 90’s and a few achieving the century mark.
By doctor doesn’t see it my way.
EC
It’s good - its bad - it’s good, it’s bad....it makes you live longer - it kills you faster....
To quote Tommy Roe, “I’m so dizzzy, my head it spins....”
You’re just trying to cheat drug companies from your hard earned money. Statins can reduce LDL cholesterol but their are many kinds of LDL cholesterol. Plus statins have the added benefit of causing memory loss and dementia in a certain percentage of the population. This is caused when the static crosses the blood brain barrier and eats the cholesterol in the brain. I have a good friend going through this and begged him to quit the statins before it’s too late but his doctor has scaremongered him to stay on the statins in spite of his mental decline.
When my doc started talking about this stuff years ago, I looked up the numbers.
Claims like “It will drop your risk of a heart attack by 50%” seemed like a no brainer. Until I looked at my risk for a heart attack. I had decent blood levels. I was overweight, but not “obese”. My blood pressure was perfect. My annual risk for a heart attack was less than 1%. Statins would drop that to 0.50%.
So something that was highly unlikely to happen was dropped to highly unlikely. I showed this to my doc and he didn’t argue my point.
Everyone is different. But every person has an obligation to educate themselves. And then work with your doctors to make the best decisions for you.
I have to admit-I feel that way too when I see “Influencer”.
I find it a somewhat repellent term. I looked it up, and the term did appear just once in the article, so...this wasn’t based on an “Influencer”.
I guess it is one of those words that describes people who try to get “Internet Famous” about some subject and is fairly fluid.
That is, a “Health Influencer” might be good or bad depending on what they are trying to influence...such as vegetarianism and “feminist yoga”...ugh...or someone who makes videos about how to manage certain health issues such as skin cancer or real nutrition.
Or...a “Cultural Influencer”? I can definitely think of both good and bad there.
So, I did what many people now do-I asked Grok which is always an interesting exercise:
An **Internet influencer** (also called an **online influencer**, **social media influencer**, or simply **influencer**) is a person who has built a large following on the internet—primarily on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X (Twitter), Twitch, or Snapchat—and uses that audience to affect opinions, trends, consumer behavior, or culture.
### Key Characteristics of an Internet Influencer
- **Significant online following**: Usually thousands to millions of followers/subscribers.
- **Content creation**: They regularly produce posts, videos, photos, live streams, or stories in a consistent niche (e.g., fashion, gaming, beauty, fitness, tech, comedy, cooking, finance, politics, etc.).
- **Engagement**: Their audience actively likes, comments, shares, and interacts with their content. High engagement is often more valuable than just raw follower count.
- **Perceived authenticity or expertise**: People follow them because they find them entertaining, relatable, knowledgeable, aspirational, or trustworthy.
- **Monetization**: Most influencers earn money through:
- Brand sponsorships / paid partnerships
- Affiliate marketing (earning commissions from links/products)
- Selling their own products/merch (courses, clothing, cosmetics, etc.)
- Platform revenue sharing (YouTube Partner Program, TikTok Creator Fund, etc.)
- Fan donations/subscriptions (Patreon, Twitch subs, OnlyFans, etc.)
### Types of Internet Influencers
Influencers are often categorized by their follower size:
| Tier | Follower Count | Typical Characteristics |
|-—————————|———————————|-——————————————————————|
| Nano-influencer | 1,000 – 10,000 | Very high engagement, niche, trusted locally |
| Micro-influencer | 10,000 – 100,000 | Still quite personal, good conversion rates |
| Mid-tier | 100,000 – 500,000 | Professional but still approachable |
| Macro-influencer | 500,000 – 1 million | Well-known in their niche |
| Mega-influencer | 1 million+ | Celebrity-level, often cross over to TV/film |
They are also categorized by **niche**:
- Lifestyle / Fashion / Beauty
- Gaming / Tech
- Fitness / Health
- Travel
- Food / Cooking
- Finance / “Finfluencers”
- Political / Commentary
- Comedy / Memes
- Adult content (OnlyFans creators, etc.)
### Difference from Traditional Celebrities
- **Traditional celebrities** usually became famous first through movies, music, sports, or TV, then expanded to the internet.
- **Internet influencers** built their fame *on the internet* first (many started as regular people posting from their bedroom). Some later cross over into traditional media (e.g., MrBeast, Charli D’Amelio, PewDiePie, or Khaby Lame).
### Modern Reality (2026)
Today the term “influencer” is very broad. It includes:
- Full-time professional creators earning millions per year
- Part-time creators with day jobs
- “Everyday” people who occasionally promote products
- AI-generated influencers (virtual influencers like Lil Miquela)
- “Deinfluencers” who advise people *not* to buy things
Being an influencer is now a legitimate career path for many young people, though it’s highly competitive, mentally demanding, and the income can be unstable.
In short:
An **Internet influencer** is someone who has turned their personal online presence and audience into a form of influence — and usually a business.
I admit that I have to squint hard and think about my cholesterol blood tests, and when I think it is bad, my doctor says something like “Oh, that’s not so bad.” while I scratch my head as I process it.
I always think there is a way to report it to a patient less confusingly, as if you could plug all the relevant variables into an equation that would spit out “GOOD” or “BAD”.
I always end up squinting at my results,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.