Posted on 03/14/2026 12:17:43 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
Tucker Carlson, the American antisemitic influencer, says U.S. President Donald Trump and senior U.S. officials should be prosecuted over the decision to strike Iran.
In last night's interview Carlson said, "There are other players here. I didn't realize it would be a joint operation with a country that believes in Amalek. Whoever made that decision should be in jail."
.....
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
I think it was tied to the Dominion lawsuit against Fox. He was part of the settlement.
Shut up Tucker
I certainly wouldn't dismiss that possibility. All the more reason for this administration in particular to have its feet held to the fire when conducting military operations on the basis of "intelligence community" assessments.
I thought it was because he was adamant about reporting on the influence of the pharmaceutical industry in the government and media Nazi tactics for promoting and enforcing mandatory vaccination policies.
You wanna see unhinged? Check out the link in my #44:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4370643/posts?page=44#44
That FR thread was beyond unhinged.
Great example. The successful brainwashing of Christians might be the scariest of all.
“”I’m no fan of Tucker Carlson, but I knew this whole situation with Iran was a farce as soon as I saw the reports of Jared Kushner showing up at those meetings. That guy has absolutely nothing to bring to the table except for his family relationship with Donald Trump.””
***
While I am forced to agree on Kushner... that by no means makes the Iran initiative a “farce”. It is a much-needed for decades action. Much to you and your ilk’s chagrin.
“”Tucker Carlson is very wrong on this and is becoming a fool, and perhaps a traitor:””
***
There’s no “becoming” about it.
Ref the title of this thread: After this war costs us the midterms, there may not be jail, but there will be consequences.
I really hope I never meet him. I might not be so cordial.
My "chagrin" has nothing to do with it.
You would support this military campaign no matter who orchestrated it, who manages it, and who actually pays the price for it. You'd be OK with Nancy Pelosi or AOC leading it, as long as you could mask it as a "MAGA" initiative.
Frankly, that says more about you than about me.
We all admired Tucker Carlson at one time, but only Jew haters like him now.
Well, I quit listening to Mark Levin because of him spewing venom, so now I will stop listening to Carlson because of his stupidity.
Too much nicotine must rot the brain.
Are you certain there will be midterms?
“”You would support this military campaign no matter who orchestrated it, who manages it, and who actually pays the price for it. You’d be OK with Nancy Pelosi or AOC leading it, as long as you could mask it as a “MAGA” initiative.
Frankly, that says more about you than about me.””
***
Oh, come now. Let’s pull ourselves out of your Disney fantasyland projections, asinine as they may be... and talk reality. The likes of Pelosi and AOC have been, were and still ARE “all in” on funding and helping the anti-American ahole mullahs in Iran...just like Obama, Susan Rice, Valerie Jarrett AND their drooling, senile OBiden puppet. So please stop attempting to project any realism or whataboutism into your lame-@ss arguments (for a refreshing change). You’re fast becoming less and less amusing and more and more of an annoyance. JS...
Trump is doing the exactly right thing, because he can via situations that were beyond his control. You guys on your side (against America) can suck on it, sit on it, twirl and spin till hell freezes over. I’m stocked up on popcorn for that show.
Good post
When you find yourself agreeing with the squad and Mamdani, you should STFU.
It’s not Muslims we don’t like, Islamic believers we don’t like because the Koran is evil
Britain had been involved in the oil business in Iran since 1901, when William Knox D'Arcy, a millionaire London socialite negotiated a 60 year oil concession with Mozaffar al-Din Shah Qajar who was the Shah of Iran from 1896 to 1907. Britain held the majority of the shares of the oil business in Iran, in which Iran received very little money in return. The fact that Britain got America to do their dirty work for them in 1953, and through a coup, forced out a democratically elected Prime Minister just to keep control of the oil business, certainly played a role in what has gone on in Iran since then.
Britain and Russia invaded Iran during WWII to protect Britain's oil control, because they feared the Shah, who had already proclaimed Iran's neutrality, was getting too friendly with the Germans. The Brits didn't give a crap about the country. They just didn't want Hitler getting his hands on their oil business. If the morons leading Britain, and France had honored the agreement they had made with Russia to protect Czechoslovakia, and taken out Hitler and his underwhelming army at the time, instead of going to Munich, without even inviting Russia to the meeting, and handing Hitler that country, there may have never been a WWII.
Tucker thinks it’s not Christian to be a war. Hogwash. There a time for every season.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.