New York City Reports Continuing Uptick in New HIV Cases, Warns of Budget Cuts

The more "magic bullets" they come up with and tout, the more this wholly preventable disease evades them.

And, what?! Progressive New York sees HALF of their HIV-infected population with full-blown AIDS?

I thought it was "a pill a day," and all good.

“”progress toward ending the HIV epidemic in New York City has slowed””

HOW long has this been an epidemic in NYC?

Wasn’t the epicenter of AIDS in the U.S. in New York?

It has been an epidemic in NYC since the gays failed to heed the one sure two actions required to avoid HIV/AIDS: Sit on your butt and keep your mouth shut.

Something doesn't wash.

"...annual HIV report shows 1,791 newly diagnosed cases in 2024..."

Who was in charge of federal AIDS funding in 2024?

It's likely that Biden lavished unprecedented funding levels into fighting HIV, and STILL they had this increase.

I think about this every time I see one of those commercials with all the sodomites: In this day and age, how does someone get the gay cancer?

This is following the exact progression of leftist policies that Thomas Sowell expounded.

STAGE 1. THE “CRISIS”: Some situation exists, whose negative aspects the anointed propose to eliminate. Such a situation is routinely characterized as a “crisis,” even though all human situations have negative aspects, and even though evidence is seldom asked or given to show how the situation at hand is either uniquely bad or threatening to get worse. Sometimes the situation described as a “crisis” has in fact already been getting better for years.

STAGE 2. THE “SOLUTION”: Policies to end the “crisis” are advocated by the anointed, who say that these policies will lead to beneficial result A. Critics say that these policies will lead to detrimental result Z. The anointed dismiss these latter claims as absurd and “simplistic,” if not dishonest.

STAGE 3. THE RESULTS: The policies are instituted and lead to detrimental result Z.

STAGE 4. THE RESPONSE: Those who attribute detrimental result Z to the policies instituted are dismissed as “simplistic” for ignoring the “complexities” involved, as “many factors” went into determining the outcome. The burden of proof is put on the critics to demonstrate to a certainty that these policies alone were the only possible cause of the worsening that occurred. No burden of proof whatever is put on those who had so confidently predicted improvement. Indeed, it is often asserted that things would have been even worse, were it not for the wonderful programs that mitigated the inevitable damage from other factors.

“Budget cuts”??

WTH? With the wonders of communism, everything will be free. There should be NO budget cuts. In fact, every department’s budget should double immediately. There’s going toi be PLENTY of FREE money! They’ll be rolling in the dough.

I call it “traipsing through the never-ending money tree orchard.”

This problem could be easily solved by importing more unvetted illegals into the city, then signing them up for welfare.

Sarcasm, of course. But most idiot liberals will think I’m being serious here.

Oh no!..... anyway......keep it in your pants “Boys”
not your “friends” lower alimentary canal.

Most liberals think the Babylon Bee is a news site.

A logical, objective, unbiased conclusion of one AI model (Perplexity.Ai) to a question revealing bias, versus refusal by another (Poe.com) which indicates bias toward a certain group (or fear of the same)

Not all AI is the same, as shown comparing Poe.com with Perplexity.Ai (and now Grok) on a basic revelatory bias test, chosen because I see it as the issue which best reveals bias in the light of Biblical teaching and effects of a practice contrary to it (yet which does not mean compassion is not to be shown to practitioners of it).

My question was:

Regarding bias, based upon typical treatment of media, what you think the reaction would be if a consensual Christian practice - let's say the Lord's supper - was shown to be responsible for up to 81% of new HIV cases aged 13 and older among men - - despite only representing approximately 4% of the male population - and 92% of new HIV among youth, and (historically) a greatly increased incidence of other infectious diseases and premature death [I left out contributing to over 700,000 premature deaths] (all of which is documented by CDC stats [https://peacebyjesuscom.blogspot.com/2019/10/negative-effects-of-homosexual.html]), and despite decades of attempting to tame it into being "safe? "

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/i-contend-that-atheism-is-a-po-neQZZp0PQIGqXZIM6YBm8g (part of a series) answered (and later formatted it as html upon request):

Media Treatment of Religion and Disease
Religious Practices and Disease Spread: When religious or traditional practices have been shown to contribute to the spread of infectious diseases (such as Ebola or COVID-19), media coverage has often been direct, critical, and sometimes harsh. For example, traditional burial practices in West Africa during the Ebola outbreak were widely reported as a major factor in disease transmission, and religious gatherings during COVID-19 were labeled as “superspreader events” by both media and public health officials. There was little hesitation to attribute responsibility to the practices themselves and to urge, or even mandate, their suspension or modification for public health reasons.
Media Framing: Media often frames religious involvement in negative health outcomes as a failure of the religious community to adapt to scientific evidence or public health guidance. There is a documented tendency to highlight and sometimes exaggerate the negative impact of religious practices, especially when they conflict with secular or scientific norms.
Public and Policy Response: In such scenarios, there is typically strong pressure for immediate change, with religious leaders called upon to reform practices, and in some cases, practices are banned or heavily regulated. Criticism is often not softened by appeals to the social or psychological benefits of the practice, nor is blame typically shifted to external factors like stigma or discrimination.
Contrast with Treatment of Homosexual Relations and HIV/AIDS
Emphasis on Stigma: In discussions of HIV/AIDS among gay and bisexual men, media and public health messaging frequently highlight the role of stigma and discrimination as contributing factors to poor health outcomes, and urge for greater acceptance and access to care. The narrative often aims to reduce blame on the community and instead focuses on societal barriers.
Avoidance of Direct Attribution: There is a marked reluctance in mainstream media and public health to directly attribute the high rates of HIV transmission to homosexual relations themselves, instead emphasizing behavioral risk factors, structural inequalities, and the need for nonjudgmental support.
Hypothetical Scenario Analysis
If a central Christian practice were shown to be responsible for 81% of new HIV cases among men (and 92% among youth), despite only 4% of the population participating:
Media Reaction:
There would likely be intense scrutiny, criticism, and calls for reform or suspension of the practice.
Media would focus on the practice as a public health threat, often without caveats about stigma or discrimination.
Religious leaders would be pressured to change doctrine or practice, and noncompliance might be met with legal or regulatory action.
The narrative would likely center on the necessity of aligning religious practice with public health imperatives, with less concern for the feelings or cultural identity of practitioners.
Public Health Messaging:
Messaging would be direct, possibly alarmist, emphasizing the statistical link and urging avoidance or modification of the practice.
There would be little effort to shield the practice from criticism based on concerns about stigmatization.
Historical Precedent:
This pattern has been seen with religious practices linked to Ebola, COVID-19, and other outbreaks.
Why the Difference?
Secular Bias and Social Norms: Media and public health institutions in many Western societies tend to treat religious practices as voluntary and modifiable, and therefore subject to critique and reform when they conflict with health priorities.
Sexual Orientation vs. Behavior: Homosexual orientation is not considered a voluntary practice, and public health messaging is shaped by a desire to avoid further marginalizing an already stigmatized group.
Historical Context: The legacy of discrimination against LGBTQ individuals has led to a more cautious, supportive approach in public discourse, even when discussing health risks.
Conclusion
If a Christian practice were statistically responsible for the majority of new HIV cases, the media would almost certainly treat it as a public health crisis directly attributable to that practice, with little mitigation for concerns about stigma or discrimination.
This contrasts with the more protective framing often applied to homosexual relations in the context of HIV/AIDS, where the narrative emphasizes social determinants and the need to avoid further stigmatization. This difference reflects both historical biases and evolving norms around public health communication and minority rights. ---

Answer from Perplexity: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/i-contend-that-atheism-is-a-po-neQZZp0PQIGqXZIM6YBm8g#43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asking the same question of https://poe.com/chat/kr7287540qq7al796t, resulted in this response by Assistant:
I'm sorry, but I can't engage with that topic.
I can't engage with that topic because it involves sensitive and potentially controversial discussions that require careful consideration and respect for diverse perspectives.
I tried 2 other models that poe.com offers, basically receiving the same "no can do" response.

Thank goodness! We needed some good news! The only good homosexuality is ...

the only disturbing news is that they’re allowed to donate blood, on their word that they’ve been “monogamous” (we all know what THEY mean by that.)

“Flies spread disease, so keep your closed!”

... “progress toward ending the HIV epidemic in New York City has slowed at a time when federal funding for HIV testing, treatment and prevention is under significant threat.”

AI Overview: No, HIV is not currently curable for the general population,

There is a cure but it takes keeping your clothes on and stop being permiscuous which costs nothing.

It's always something with those bozos and their never ending need for everyone else's cash to fill their buckets full of holes.

Well, now its the corn-holing illegal aliens causing the uptick in HIV.......treat them for free !

You don’t realize that if you let the government take enough of your money they can do anything. Look at the high speed rail system in Kalifornistan. Look at how many votes Mamdani got simply by promising to plunder those who worked for their money and giving it to those who vote for it.