Posted on 12/09/2025 9:01:46 AM PST by SunkenCiv
Boom Supersonic CEO Blake Scholl lays out their timeline for passenger flights and addresses the costs of supersonic travel on 'FOX Business In Depth: The Flight Path Forward.'
Boom Supersonic CEO takes on critics: They 'don't invent the future, innovators do' | 5:21
Fox Business | 3.25M subscribers | 17,203 views | November 27, 2025
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Getting to London in Three HoursThat is the goal for Boom Supersonic as they develop their faster than sound flights. Here is Grady Trimble with a look back at when they took a big leap forward toward that goal. Live on Fox Business.
I think they just broke the sound barrier, didn't they? It just happened. Stu, we're watching with a crowd here. We heard them cheer. They're at around 35,000 ft, Mach 1.07 right now, about to approach Mach 1.1. And that is, of course, supersonic. Faster than the speed of sound.
I'll tell you from the experience on the ground here, because this plane is so high, we did not hear that characteristic boom that you would expect to hear with supersonic flights, but that's because it's flying at 35,000 ft. But we can confirm that this plane, XB-1, the prototype plane, the precursor to commercial supersonic travel, just hit Mach 1.1. They hope to fly passengers in it in the next five years or so.
And actually, Stu, if we have time, the CEO of Boom is right here with us. If we can bring him in. This is Blake Scholl. We talked to him earlier today. This is a huge milestone for your company, Blake. It feels incredible. Right now, we're supersonic, literally as we speak. What do you say to the people who are skeptical that a private company, without a government helping you out, can develop a supersonic commercial jetliner?
Well, it's definitely not easy. But I'm a big believer that small, driven teams that are focused on a goal that really matters can accomplish big things. People said we couldn't build a supersonic jet, but it looks like we have. Some people say we won't be able to build a supersonic airliner. Well, we'll find out.
And joining me now, Boom Supersonic CEO Blake Scholl, we just heard your response to critics who say that you cannot build a supersonic airliner. Where do things stand now after that amazing breakthrough back in January?
Yeah, it's, you know, this is an overnight success, ten years in the making. We've already accomplished lots of things that the critics said would never be possible. From building a prototype airplane that could break the sound barrier, solving sonic boom in a practical way, no audible sonic boom on the ground, and doing that with a tiny team, just 50 people and essentially no government funding.
So now the airliner is bigger, it's more challenging, it's safety critical in a whole new way. But this is just basic engineering. All the technology is there. And I'm a big believer that teams that believe in a mission, that believe in a purpose and are willing to go all in can accomplish the so-called impossible.
Well, you know, the CEO of United Airlines, this is Michael Leskinen. He was at a conference, and he actually brought you up. And he said, and I know that you've already struck a deal with them and they've done a preorder, he said, because the customers are there, the demand is there. It's just getting it, the technology and getting the planes up and in the air. Talk about the time frame for you and your corporate partners, which to be clear, is American, United, and Japan Airlines.
Yeah, I think that's exactly right. I mean, I don't know a single person who doesn't want a faster flight, provided it's safe and affordable and comfortable. And Concorde really missed on all three of those built in the 1960s. Today we've got so much better technology. We've got aerodynamics, materials, propulsion, computer-aided design that are just light years ahead of where we used to be.
And so as we stand here today, we know all the technology works. We know the airlines want it. We know the passengers want it. We're in the process of scaling up. So we're going to see our first full-scale engine running in just a few months. And then we're going to scale up the airplane and we'll have an Overture in the skies in just a few years. And our goal is to be ready to carry passengers by the end of the decade.
Yeah. From Paris to New York, four hours versus what it is eight hours right now. New York to London, three hours, 40 minutes right now it takes seven hours. And then of course, the cost. You know, I think the target here is about, what, $3,500 per round trip ticket? Just for these flights I just mentioned. But you've got a lot of critics out there. They're saying that supersonic travel is simply too costly. And that really is what took out the Concorde. And the CEO of Air France has actually been critical of you. Respond to that criticism.
You know, the nice thing is critics don't invent the future. Innovators do. And you know what? We're looking at relative to Concorde, which really was too unaffordable, $20,000 a ticket, that's for royalty and rock stars. But today we're going to be able to do this for the price of a business class ticket, which is something that tens of millions of people already pay for day in and day out, every day of the year. And over time, as we continue to scale, innovate, gain efficiencies, that cost is going to come down.
Just go back 50 years when we used to make airplanes faster routinely, of course, from the Wright brothers through to 1958, when we had the first jets, we routinely improved the speed of travel, the comfort of travel, the cost of travel. And the last half century, we've been living in a dark age of travel where we haven't gone faster and we've made air travel from going from an experience that people used to be inspired by to one they dread. None of that is necessary. We can go forward. We just have to be committed and continue to innovate and stay dedicated to the mission. It's all possible.
Blake Scholl, thank you for being here.YouTube transcript reformatted at textformatter.ai
Boom Boom Boom Boom...
The Concorde flew from 1976 to 2003.
Just one small step away from going hypersonic.
The engineering needed to make the SR-71 fly without, say, the windows popping out due to airframe deformation during heating, was so difficult that it hasn't been matched by anyone. And it was a two-seater that required in-air refueling with unique fuel. The next big leap (if any) will be suborbital rockets, such as the Starship may do. I'm not going to be an early adopter of those kinds of flights, no matter who builds it, btw. 😁
I have been in a Concord, unfortunately only on the ground.
I think it would be cool if Pan Am got and flew a boom plane.
That’s why there’s a transcript.
The rest of the blakescholl, boomsupersonic keywords, sorted:
Pan Am, yes! And why not TWA too while we’re at it? Ah, the good ol’ days...
A pump-n-dump if there ever was one.
PanAM is back
Pan Am came back in 2025, but not as a regular commercial airline; rather, through a luxury, nostalgia-driven, all-business-class charter flight called “Tracing the Transatlantic,”
Operated by a partner airline on a Boeing 757, following historic routes for high-end travelers.
Simultaneously, Pan Am Global Holdings and its partner AVi8 Air Capital started the formal FAA certification process in 2025 to potentially relaunch Pan Am as a scheduled commercial airline, exploring underserved markets like Hawaii, but this is a long-term, uncertain project
The guy in the photo above looks like he is about to cry.
Since it’s not a publicly traded company, no. But nice try.
In the near future, supersonic flight will be a premium service limited to major routes. Small jet on demand air travel with high end amenities will become more common. Meanwhile, subsonic mass market airline travel is likely to gradually become more comfortable under the pressure of such competition.
A decade from now, we may have blended wing body airliners with massive internal spaces, comfortable theater style seating, and food, beverage, shopping, and entertainment amenities like a high end mini-mall.
The upper end of the market may inspire envy, but it helps to improve the mass market.
You don’t know the definition of a pump-n-dump.
The Concorde was never economically viable due to fuel costs. It was heavily subsidized.
The Concorde was limited to transatlantic routes due to its sonic boom causing problems on the ground.
The Concorde was not removed from service because one crashed. The crash was just the excuse to do what everybody knew should be done but were too "proud" to do.
Speaking from my experience as a (former) professional photographer ...
Without doing any darkroom/photoshop cheating ...
If you're speaking in public (or, worse, singing) I can make you look like anything I want to make you look like. And there's not a damn thing you can do about it.
When Big Media publishes a seemingly unflattering photo of someone, know that they had a huge selection from which to choose. They chose that unflattering photo because they want to disparage the person without actually using words.
IOW: You're being manipulated.
Interesting!
As for this thing that they're marketing, they're eleven years into it and don't even have an engine for it.
Sure, they just need a few dilithium crystals, but until then, this is all smoke and mirrors, photoshopped ones at that.
Who would want to? Now, getting away from there as quickly as possible... 😁
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.