Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boom Supersonic XB-1 hits new speed record in latest test flight
New Atlas ^ | October 10, 2024 | Joe Salas

Posted on 10/10/2024 7:17:22 PM PDT by Red Badger

Boom's XB-1 supersonic jet took its fifth test flight out of Mojave Air & Space Port on Oct 7th, 2024 setting a few new records in the process. The XB-1 is the one-third-scale platform that Boom is using as the foundation for its eventual Overture aircraft that aims to bring back commercialized supersonic passenger flight.

It's been over 20 years since the Concorde took its last flight. It went supersonic in 1969, able to fly at Mach 2 (about 1,354 mph / 2,180 km/h). Though it could fly passengers from New York to London in under three hours (compared to the typical seven to eight-hour journey), it had two major issues: first, the Concorde was very thirsty. It would burn 5,638 gallons (25,629 L) of fuel per hour at that speed. Secondly, it was very noisy. The sonic booms it would create caused issues when it would fly over land and subsequently, supersonic travel over populated areas was restricted. Oh, and it was really expensive to book a flight in. We're talking US$12,000 for a luxury round trip.

As a result, the Concorde – an icon of commercial travel and aviation history – was taken out of service on October 24th, 2003, relegating commercial supersonic travel to the annals of history.

Colorado-based Boom Supersonic is looking to change all that.

In March of this year, the world's first privately developed supersonic jet took flight for the very first time with pilot Bill "Doc" Shoemaker at the controls. This flight took place in what might be considered hallowed airspace, as the Mojave Air & Space Port in Mojave, California is also the location where the Bell X-1 first broke the sound barrier in 1947.

(Excerpt) Read more at newatlas.com ...


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans; Outdoors; Travel
KEYWORDS: aviation; supersonic; xb1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
FROM BOOM SUPERSONIC WEBSITE:

https://boomsupersonic.com/flyby/xb-1-live-blog-flight-test-program


1 posted on 10/10/2024 7:17:22 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 04-Bravo; 1FASTGLOCK45; 1stFreedom; 2ndDivisionVet; 2sheds; 60Gunner; 6AL-4V; A.A. Cunningham; ...

SUPERSONIC AVIATION PING!.........


2 posted on 10/10/2024 7:18:10 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The company expects five more flights before it's ready to break the sound barrier.

This flight was to 0.69 Mach ... they're proceeding carefully.

3 posted on 10/10/2024 7:20:32 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Well, it’s not made of carbon fiber..................


4 posted on 10/10/2024 7:22:15 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Even if it were ... Carbon fiber is great for aircraft. Lousy for submarines ...


5 posted on 10/10/2024 7:23:12 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It doesn’t appear to have a lot of passenger room... Will they be creating a commercial version, or will this be purely private passenger aviation?


6 posted on 10/10/2024 7:33:56 PM PDT by jerod (Nazis were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jerod

This is a 1/3 scale test bed...................


7 posted on 10/10/2024 7:42:30 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I see outlines for windows but no actual passenger windows. Perhaps those will be in the full size model.

Although, I’ve thought for some time now that windows aren’t necessary. Exterior cameras and interior screens would seem to be superior.


8 posted on 10/10/2024 8:01:04 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Yes, smoother exterior skin, more aerodynamically efficient..............


9 posted on 10/10/2024 8:07:41 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
From the article: It will have a range of 4,250 nautical miles (4,891 miles / 7,869 km), which means it could make the trip from Los Angeles to Sydney, Australia without having to stop for fuel.

Wrong. Sydney is 12050 km from LA. It would fall out of the air from fuel exhaustion somewhere over the South Pacific. The author of this article is an idiot and has a problem with math.

I can not see this craft as a commercial success. Aerodynamic drag is a function of velocity squared. Example: A modern jet airliner will fly at about 550 knots, this craft will be flying at about 1300 knots. 550 knots squared =302500, 1300 knots squared =1690000. Thus the drag at that speed is 5.5 times greater. Fuel burn will kill it as a commercial success.

It may have a niche market for those of great wealth. Fuel burn and range killed the Concord as it will this new aircraft.

I lived near Heathrow Airport in the 70s. Concord would fly over my house daily. I never tired of seeing that beautiful machine and the roar of the Rolls-Royce/Snecma Olympus 593 turbojet engines.

10 posted on 10/10/2024 8:17:28 PM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist ,MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Anyone who’s ever taken a trans-Pacific flight and listened to how many frequent flyer miles you get knows that 4100 miles from LA to Sydney, Australia is nonsense.


11 posted on 10/10/2024 8:21:41 PM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“We’re talking US$12,000 for a luxury round trip.”

Not if you have a Saudi government subsidized flight. I was making arrangements for my trip home with my travel agent. Decided I wanted to fly business class. I had it mostly set up when my travel agent informed me that if I spent 500 dollars more and didn’t mind a lay over in London, I could fly on the Concorde. I said sign me up. Was a great flight. Mach 2 at 60 thousand feet baby.

My favorite speed records were set by Maj Henry J. Deutschendorf. You might know of his famous son John Deutschendorf, who went by the stage name John Denver.

https://www.aftc.af.mil/News/On-This-Day-in-Test-History/Article-Display-Test-History/Article/2457446/january-12-1961-b-58-hustler-sets-new-official-world-speed-record/#:~:text=A%20Strategic%20Air%20Command%20B-58%20Hustler%20crew%2C%20led,with%20a%201%2C000-kg%20payload%20and%20with%20no%20payload.


12 posted on 10/10/2024 8:32:55 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (“History doesn’t repeat itself but it often rhymes” - Possibly Mark Twain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Chuck Yeager and the Bell X-1 were based @ Muroc Army Air Field, which is now Edwards AFB.


13 posted on 10/10/2024 8:37:36 PM PDT by Taxman ((SAVE AMERICA! VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2024! SAVE AMERICA!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

who went by the stage name John Denver.......

and died in a plane crash when it ran out of fuel and he could not access the fuel tank switch to use the other tank.....................


14 posted on 10/10/2024 8:44:59 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

I recall hearing sonic booms caused by the B-58 when I was in college. Everyone knew what they were and didn’t fret about the “booms” like they do now.

In March, 1963, I saw a B-58 on the ramp @ NAS Jax. It was under guard by armed Marines. Couldn’t get near it.

Beautiful airplane, IMHO! In the category of the RA-5C Vigilante!

Seven years later, at NAS Cubi Point, RP, I met an Air Force Major who had flown the Hustler. His stories were fascinating! I bought his drinks!


15 posted on 10/10/2024 8:57:41 PM PDT by Taxman ((SAVE AMERICA! VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2024! SAVE AMERICA!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Make money with Boom!


16 posted on 10/10/2024 9:20:20 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

You are very right. And I also don’t see much future use of the aircaft either. Mach 2 with a stripped aircraft is fine, but so what. It falls into the capacity need of the SR-71 that they had a lot of trouble using it. It finally became a traveling poloroid machine. They just couldn’t shoot it down. And it fessed up to Mach 4. But those ponies need feeding and they had to refuel sometimes twice before it reached the altitude it worked at. The SR had a range of 2500 miles but climbing to altitude uses fuel.

wy69


17 posted on 10/10/2024 9:38:57 PM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

You are very right. And I also don’t see much future use of the aircaft either. Mach 2 with a stripped aircraft is fine, but so what. It falls into the capacity need of the SR-71 that they had a lot of trouble using it. It finally became a traveling poloroid machine. They just couldn’t shoot it down. And it fessed up to Mach 4. But those ponies need feeding and they had to refuel sometimes twice before it reached the altitude it worked at. The SR had a range of 2500 miles but climbing to altitude uses fuel.

wy69


18 posted on 10/10/2024 9:38:57 PM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If it’s not the XB-70 Valkyrie I’m not going.....

I want them to rebuild the #2 prototype

If it’s 737 Max, I’m DEFINITELY not going......


19 posted on 10/10/2024 10:05:49 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
[69 Mach]

Sign me up! I'll definitely take a 69 Mach though I prefer the 70. I was at my parent's house when my sister's boyfriend showed up in his 1969 Mach 1. The two previous years he had a Camaro and a Firebird though I'm not certain which was the 67 and which was the 68.


20 posted on 10/10/2024 10:11:03 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson