Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Declassified nuclear propulsion program: band aircraft progress report 1956-1958
Youtube ^ | april, 2025 | What is Nuclear

Posted on 11/30/2025 10:02:50 PM PST by MarlonRando

An incredible NUCLEAR-POWERED FLIGHT film. We scanned this declassified film showing 30 minutes of detail from the major reactor development program at its peak, between 1956-1958.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...


TOPICS: Education; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: aviation; military; nuclear
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim

Technology from about 75 years ago. This is almost 100 year old technology. Imagine what we have now. I mean, I hope we have amazing things waiting in the wings.
1 posted on 11/30/2025 10:02:50 PM PST by MarlonRando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MarlonRando

Whoops—- “Manned Aircraft Progress Report”— stupid spellcheck. geeez


2 posted on 11/30/2025 10:04:13 PM PST by MarlonRando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarlonRando

“this is a secret film containing restricted data”
(cough, cough)


3 posted on 11/30/2025 10:29:56 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarlonRando

Imagine the fallout (pun intended) of a nuclear powered aircraft crashing into a housing ediition in Maryland or somewhere. I think that might have shelved the project. They put a hanger area in Idaho for it though.


4 posted on 11/30/2025 11:32:02 PM PST by Equine1952 (MM1SS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarlonRando

Couldn’t make it work for planes. Succeeded with submarines . Would be ideal for spacecraft.


5 posted on 12/01/2025 2:51:23 AM PST by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarlonRando

I was going to ask if the aircraft banded together for mutual support.


6 posted on 12/01/2025 3:41:58 AM PST by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Yes I think that nuclear proportion is logical for the next generation of spacecraft. The only problem would be getting the radioactive materials out in the space so that you could load them into the craft. The reason being, that all of the liberals and environmentalists would cry and wine that there could be an accident before getting into orbit. That’s what I love about watching these old formally top-secret videos. The men back then just went full steam ahead and they just just had a job to do.


7 posted on 12/01/2025 4:10:23 AM PST by MarlonRando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Equine1952

Yeah, it turns out heavy reactors and lightweight aircraft aren’t a good mix. They envisioned planes in the air for months at a time.


8 posted on 12/01/2025 4:10:35 AM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

the liberals would “whine.”. Wow, spellcheck is so helpful when you’re driving.


9 posted on 12/01/2025 4:11:15 AM PST by MarlonRando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MarlonRando

Its comical when I read about “the enormous technical challenge” posed by building small modular nuclear reactors, when the Navy has been doing it for 70 years.


10 posted on 12/01/2025 4:49:50 AM PST by motor_racer (Who will bell the cat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motor_racer

yep, and there are 10-11 million illegals and we can’t go back to the moon even though the apollo lunar module was literally wrapped in tinfoil


11 posted on 12/01/2025 4:56:51 AM PST by MarlonRando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MarlonRando

I thought it was ‘banned’ aircraft progress report.


12 posted on 12/01/2025 8:22:20 AM PST by Scrambler Bob (Running Rampant, and not endorsing nonsense; My pronoun is EXIT. And I am generally full of /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Actually they could make it work.

They logically decided, however, that it was a stupid idea.


13 posted on 12/01/2025 10:15:54 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian (Orange is the new brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson