Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Republicans Finally Unite on an Obamacare Alternative?
Liberty Nation ^ | 11/14/2025 | Tim Donner

Posted on 11/14/2025 11:25:53 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

A monumental historic opportunity will be presented to Trump and the GOP – if they have the guts to seize it.

While the common perception of the six-week-long government shutdown is that Republicans won and Democrats lost, the Dems did manage to squeeze one notable concession from the GOP. In return for the votes of eight Democratic Senators to reopen the government, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) promised to bring the reauthorization of COVID-era Obamacare insurance subsidies to a vote in December. And while Republicans have no appetite to further bankroll a program they have unanimously opposed for the last decade and a half, both parties stand to gain something from the vote. But the difference is that the Democrats, shut out of power, can only engage in pure partisan politics, while President Trump and Republicans will be presented with a monumental historic opportunity if they choose to carpe diem (seize the day).

Can Obamacare Finally Be Replaced?

When the GOP likely refuses to renew the subsidies that kept the Affordable Care Act (ACA) afloat without substantial increases in premiums during the pandemic, Democrats will certainly follow their usual script and call Trump and his allies cruel and heartless for allowing costs to rise on the more than 20 million Americans enrolled in Obamacare. But if Republicans respond by just discussing how the program is and always has been unsustainable, they would miss their first opportunity in years to fix it once and for all.

As the president and Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) have proposed, those subsidies ticketed for insurance companies could instead be redirected to the beneficiaries with no middleman. Every Obamacare enrollee would receive a check from the federal government to spend on health care as they see fit through Health Savings Accounts (HSAs).

And that...

(Excerpt) Read more at libertynation.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: spammingfr

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2025 11:25:53 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I wish the GOP would get busy and come up with a replacement for Obamacare that really works for the People.


2 posted on 11/14/2025 11:30:14 AM PST by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There’s this thing called the private sector that worked pretty good before it was abandoned about sixty years ago in favor of the government-insurance-medicine incest model that currently exists.


3 posted on 11/14/2025 11:38:12 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpetty121263
The problem is that most Americans love ObamaCare. They just want someone else to pay for it.

There’s no way to fix that kind of infantile sense of entitlement.

4 posted on 11/14/2025 11:38:27 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No. Get the government out of healthcare altogether, it’s not their job to be involved in the first place.


5 posted on 11/14/2025 11:39:20 AM PST by Antihero101607
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Basic health care should be plentiful, inexpensive, and of high quality. Keeping People Healthy is the name of the game.

Advanced, more complex, and intrusive care and procedures will always be rationed, by quality or prices.

“Health Care” is not a right. You can’t have a “right” if someone has to work to provide it for you.

The world is a big place. Lots of people.

Some people get sick real bad and need some help.
Some people take advantage of every grifting opportunity and don’t give a shiiite.
Combine compassion for the first, with sheer disgust for the second. That’s where we are.


6 posted on 11/14/2025 11:42:53 AM PST by Macoozie (Roll MAGA, roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Vast swaths of young people are now caught in the indentred servitude trap of socialism.

We’re not getting out of it without pain and probably civil war.


7 posted on 11/14/2025 11:45:58 AM PST by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“ Every Obamacare enrollee would receive a check from the federal government to spend on health care”

Perhaps put money in an account which can be drawn only to be paid directly to a healthcare provider. Giving a check to people will just find it spent on who knows what.


8 posted on 11/14/2025 11:47:02 AM PST by Freee-dame (The left never dreamed that Trump would be back in the White House in 2025. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Congressman Gary Palmer (R-Alabama 6th/Hoover) introduced his alternative plan on March 6. It's been buried in the busy-ness of this administration's first 10 months of activity, but hopefully it can start gaining some traction (though sadly, the author of the article in the OP had no idea this exists).

Here's the highlights:

New Health Options Act

    Creates a new marketplace: A separate market is proposed that exists alongside the ACA marketplace.
    Requires cash price disclosure: Insurers must disclose the cash price of a service if it is lower than the negotiated rate.
    Increases flexibility: Aims to provide more choice for those in narrow provider networks.
    Guarantees coverage: Ensures coverage for preexisting conditions, but at a lower cost.

Retirement Freedom Act

    Decouples Social Security and Medicare: Allows seniors to choose to opt out of Medicare enrollment without forfeiting their Social Security benefits.
    Empowers seniors: Aims to give senior citizens more control over their own medical decisions by allowing them to keep private insurance if they prefer.

General stances on healthcare reform

    Repeal and replace ACA: Palmer has long advocated for replacing the ACA with market-based reforms, such as allowing insurance to be purchased across state lines.
    Reduce government control: Supports limiting the size and scope of government involvement in healthcare.
    Support for specific measures: Introduced legislation to ensure doctors get paid under new coding systems for Medicaid and Medicare patients.

9 posted on 11/14/2025 11:50:38 AM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We don’t need an alternative. We need it eliminated altogether and health insurance returned to the free market, even the decision to not get insurance. Give the bureaucrats in charge of this mess a nice exit bonus of 100 dollars and fire them all. If it turns out that they can’t be fired then transfer them to a chair, a school desk, and a broken fax machine in a closet in some other department. The door probably shouldn’t be locked.


10 posted on 11/14/2025 12:00:58 PM PST by arthurus (l| covfeve |l j)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Insurance was already screwed up, thanks to the states dictating policy content, for decades.

In the 80s/90s, the argument was that insurance should be required to pay for routine checkups. The theory being this would encourage more folks to get one, thereby reducing big claims later. States made it required across the board, though it was easier to get hospitalization only if you wanted it.

But all those new, albeit smaller claims, turned out to be more expensive simply due to the massive volume increase.

States also began to require that policies cover psychiatry, hence the explosion of ADHD in the 90s.

As policies got more and more expensive, the next “Big Idea” was commie care.

So it’s not about replacing commie care but getting government out of it, other than to deal w/fraud (from either side of the transaction).

The only thing keeping insurance companies from crossing state lines previously was the slightly different policy content requirements among the different states. With those gone, there’s no reason for an insurance company not to cover you on travel.


11 posted on 11/14/2025 12:04:08 PM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Replace it with NOTHING


12 posted on 11/14/2025 12:08:04 PM PST by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Just shitcan it totally and let market figure it out.


13 posted on 11/14/2025 12:12:15 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Offer the American public what Congress gets...

https://www.opm.gov/healthcare-insurance/healthcare/


14 posted on 11/14/2025 12:12:50 PM PST by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpetty121263

The optimum replacement is to get government out of the ‘healthcare’ industry. They were never given the power by the constitution and everything they touch gets screwed up because the bureaucrats are involved. They even supress insurance competition with their regulations. Of course, the insurance companies like that.


15 posted on 11/14/2025 12:16:42 PM PST by curious7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Right or wrong, that would be political suicide in 2025.


16 posted on 11/14/2025 12:22:38 PM PST by Miami Rebel (A crap product,and vastly over-proced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Well if they do (which I’m not optimistic on) Massie will vote “no” to keep Obamacare in place as is...for the sake of the Constitution, of course.


17 posted on 11/14/2025 12:38:14 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

They could just leave the structure of Obamacare in place, but repeal all of the regulations which limited plans, banned providers from building their own medical centers outside of the corporate system, etc. It would essentially...”wither on the vine” as people voluntarily leave it...voluntarily. (a little throwback to a much lied about quote from Mr. Newt back in the 90s)


18 posted on 11/14/2025 12:40:29 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That Americans cannot agree is roof that we do agree… no more imposition of my plan over your plan.

Freedom to choose is the plan. Some believe they are theirs brother’s keeper and voluntarily donate to charity.., or support their lazy brother.

Some create jobs and expect their lazy brother to work.

To each his own is the plan.


19 posted on 11/14/2025 12:51:45 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Subsidizing Dems d will never work no matter how you do it. The solution is on the supply side. More doctors. More nurses. More healthcare workers of all kinds.


20 posted on 11/14/2025 12:52:34 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson