Posted on 10/28/2025 11:15:46 PM PDT by Jonty30
BREAKING - The young Scottish girl, who was forced to brandish a knife and an axe to defend herself and her sister against a Romanian migrant and was arrested, has been vindicated after a Romanian grooming gang was jailed for sexually abusing women across Dundee.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
You have to read in between the lines when it comes to liberal speak. She’s being contained, because she’s a problem for the authorities. Nothing the authorities have chosen to do, for her protection, is not for her benefit.
They only didn’t give her a form of jail because normal Brits were watching what the authorities would do to her.
I read today that private individuals rescued 52 children, probably mostly white Brits, from trafficking recently while the authorities looked the other way.
“And a child shall lead them.’’
this is definitely a WTF situation
No, the 12-year-old girl involved in the Dundee Lochee incident is not “detained” in the sense of being held in custody; as a minor, she was referred to Scotland’s youth justice system (via the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration), which focuses on assessments, support, and community-based interventions rather than imprisonment.
There is no evidence from official investigations supporting the claim that she was targeted for “not allowing herself to be raped”—there is absolutely nothing on that in the video we all saw.
While a man and woman (believed to be the couple) were charged on September 4, 2025, in connection with the incident, details remain limited and do not confirm or reject any rape attempt; the charges relate to the confrontation itself, and speculation on their nature is purely speculation .
The “feral animals” are legal residents who were walking in a public area and we don’t know the full picture of what happened. Do you ? No, you have speculation.
Let’s stick to verified details from authorities rather than inflammatory assumptions that undermine the actual focus on supporting vulnerable children.
We need to wait for the complete picture - right now the only verified thing we have is the video and that tells us nothing about what went on before or after.
The authorities lie. They lock people up for showing videos that put to rest any presumption that authorities are acting on behalf of the citizenry.
Do I need to the full situation of a teen Brit, who is backing her younger sister behind her while being encroached upon by a grown man who won’t leave them alone until she brandishes weapons and then the authorities whisk her into hiding?
Do we really need to know more than what it seems in your mind?
It doesn’t have to be four steel walls for it to be jail. It just has to be a room that you spend all your day in to be a jail.
Some people will be in denial until millions are dead and we see the death camps. It’s happened before.
It was deeper than that!
William the conqueror, his Norman descendants, then the Angevin kings - none of them spoke a word of English (well, it was Anglo-Saxon, English didn’t exist until the 13th century as Old English i.e. Chaucer’s English)
After the Norman Conquest in 1066, William and his court spoke Norman French. This language was used for official court business and justice.
Many of those kings from 1066 to 1399 spent the majority of their time in what is now France - until Richard Coeur de Lion, they actually owned more land in France than the King of France - and considered themselves part of the “French” aristocracy and contenders for the throne of France.
Richard the Lionheart (Coeur de Lion) not only didn’t speak a word of English, he only spent 6 months of his reign in England!
The first king of England who could speak English was Henry IV in 1399.
It is incorrect to push back nationalist ideas to the middle ages - there you had, for instance in “Scotland” a Norman-French aristocracy with close ties to the Norman rulers in England, you had Britonic (Welsh) speakers in Strathcyle/Glasgow (Dundee!), you had the remnants of the Picts in the North, you had Danes in the west and the “Scotti” themselves were migrants from Ireland who came across in the 5th century! I love the mixes and nation building (and merging etc) we see in history
I’m not taking the authorities statements - the girl is not “detained” - there are no charges put against her.
your statement is pure speculation “of a teen Brit, who is backing her younger sister behind her while being encroached upon by a grown man who won’t leave them alone until she brandishes weapons and then the authorities whisk her into hiding?”
The only thing we know is
1. this was a girl and her sister
2. we don’t see what happens before the video starts, so no idea if the grown man approached her or she them, absolutely nothing
3. we don’t know if she was brandishing the weapon before - we don’t know where she got the weapons or at what point and we definitely don’t know WHY she had them
4. we do know that he asked her to show what she was holding
She needs to be kept safe in any situation. If the man WAS a groomer, then she should be kept safe, don’t you think?
Look only at the facts known and you have to conclude that we know little to nothing about what or why.
speculation gains us absolutely nothing.
Why are there no interviews with her parents, relatives or friends? That is puzzling.
Trusting the UK authorities in any dispute regarding rapefuges is like trusting Al Gore’s word on the climate. Exhibit A: Rotherham. Exhibit B: Tommy Robinson. Exhibit C: the continued influx of new rapefuges on an easily defensible island nation.
She “... is not “detained” in the sense of being held in custody”.
So is she at home then and free to go about as she pleases? fkn IDJIT !!
The “feral animals” are legal residents who were walking in a public area and we don’t know the full picture of what happened. Do you ? No, you have speculation.
Let’s stick to verified details from authorities rather than inflammatory assumptions that undermine the actual focus on supporting vulnerable children.
Personally, I have never known anyone who has been charged for harassing's a 12 year old girl to the point that she needed to wield weapons to defend herself. Do you? Those fine, upstanding citizens that you mention were taunting a 12 year old girl and scaring her to death. Yes, let's do stick with the facts from the video that we all saw. She was not robbing them or harassing's them. The "adults" held the key to de-escalation. The principal fact was that she only wanted them to leave her and her sister alone. These citizens of the year would have no part of that.
Well, the authorities would probably rule that it wasn't really rape even if she or her sister were raped if the gypsie rapists were quick about it.
Call me crazy, but if I see a thirteen year old girl trying to shield her 12 year old sister from a man that is continually encroaching upon them as they are backing up, I dont need anymore facts beyond what I see.
Especially when it is known that 350,000 girls are verified to have been trafficked and the unofficial numbers are over a million.
Fine, then stick to verified details period. ignore the authorities.
If we do that, we have even LESS information - we have the video, that’s it.
We don’t have interviews with the parents, friends, neighbors etc. of the girls, we have literally nothing but the video and the video tells us little
Exhibit A: Rotherham was horrific and despicable yes - but that happened 318 miles away, in England, while this happened in Dundee in Scotland. England and Scotland have different laws, cops etc - they are two countries in the United Kingdom.
It was also with Mirpuri Pakistanis. We are told (and have read) that the couple involved in Dundee were Bulgarian and we read that they are Bulgarian gypsies (not sure if that was verified or not). Paks and Bulgarians don’t really interact even IF both were Mohammedan.
Exhibit B - you do realize that Tommy Robinson is pretty much not liked in Scotland as he is strongly opposed to Scottish nationalism?
Exhibit C: the couple involved weren’t refugees, but legal residents. Even the criminals in the Rotherham and other cases were Mirpuri immigrants, sometimes second generation immigrants who had come across in the 70s to the 90s.
As to refugees: 7,400 refugees were resettled in the UK through various resettlement schemes in the year ending June 2025, a 10% decrease from the previous year.
I agree that this should be 0.
The UK needs to focus on its problem with Mohammedans - and this has been the case since the 80s. Why did they import Mirpuris? I can understand taking in the Ugandan refugees - those were British Empire “citizens” who had rights to live in the UK, and those (mostly Hindu but also Christian and some Mohammedans) assimilated pretty well into the UK and have low to zero crime rates (the only ones they seem to do are white collar financial crimes) - even the Mohammedans from that time seem to have left religion like Saqid Javid whose wife AND children are church going Christians and the two even had their honeymoon in Israel.
RWM - you are accused of being a globalist communist supporting China and Russia, is that true?
She is kept safe.
If you believe that the couple were groomers (which they could have been, but we have no proof either way), then why do you not want her to be kept safe?
The man and woman were charged in connection with the incident, but the specific charges have not been publicly disclosed.
There is NO information about the nature of the charges against them - so your “charged for harassing’s a 12 year old girl “ is speculation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.