You seem to be rather knowledgeable about such things?
Have you done intel work here in USA for Australia, I wonder?
Posted on 08/15/2025 6:09:52 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Recent comments by America’s Director of National Intelligence have reignited calls for the United States government to reveal what it knows about the UFO phenomenon.
Asked whether she had discovered anything relating to UFOs during a recent podcast with News Corp journalist Miranda Devine, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard provided a hint about her own views on the topic.
“Nothing that I'm prepared to talk about today… I'm just going to say this: yeah, we're continuing to look for the truth and share that truth with the American people,” she said.
Pressed on whether she thought aliens were responsible for the phenomenon, the senior US official said she had her “own views and opinions”, but was restricted in what she could say.
“In this role, I’ve got to be careful with what I share,” she said.
Speaking to Sky News Australia on Thursday, veteran investigative reporter Ross Coulthart told Sharri Markson there had been a “huge number” of US officials speaking out about the issue since the New York Times revealed in a 2017 cover story there was a secret UFO research program inside the Pentagon.
"Tulsi Gabbard is saying what a huge number of US officials have been saying for the past few years,” Coulthart told Sharri.
“There's a huge sea change happening in American executive government right now. They're suddenly waking up to the reality of UFOs.”
Coulthart said the senior officials who are “very interested in the phenomenon” included Vice President JD Vance.
...
“But I did an interview with Don Trump Jr late last year… he admitted to me that he is very interested in UAPs, and he's very engaged, and I get the impression so is his old man.”
(Excerpt) Read more at skynews.com.au ...
Yep, sure does look like narrative prep, post-haste. Maybe not “THE” narrative, but certainly “A” narrative. True narrative? Pylo-krapp narrative? Unknown as yet. Which narrative leads to max controllability with the least effort expended by the controllers?
Yep. Ridicule, lies, and intellectual dishonesty (like strawman arguments).
So-called debunkers say things like, "People see fuzzy lights in the sky and stupidly assume they're extraterrestrials." "They're just fools."
Or, "People who claim to have seen UFOs are all liberals and retards."
"DEI distraction."
"Squirrel!"
With that in mind, follow on-down through the thread.
Woke by-product: “waking” up to UFO’s...
Possible, but not probable.
I will admit that I have no idea what is going on with UAP/UFO sightings and abduction. I know people who have seen them up close. To quote President Trump, "Our military pilots are seeing something that they cannot identify."
I have no idea what's going on. But something is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YOwNOlV5DM&pp=ygULbGEgbWFyenVsbGk%3D
Run time 25 m 20 s
Alien Invasion or Smoke and Mirrors?
It's pretty clear that the Wokesters are delusional, with some, if not many, of that group exhibiting psychotic behavior.
Follow the river...to it banks...because the truth lies there...
or a Q dead end.
“Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof”
Carl Sagan’s famous quote is specious reasoning. One doesn’t need extraordinary proof, one only needs a simple fact.
Fort’s larger point was that when people are confronted with realities that don’t fit their world view they simply ignore them or do not adjust their point of view.
https://rumble.com/v6xk2xq-joe-rogan-experience-2365-rep.-anna-paulina-luna.html
Aliens ?
Fallen Angels
Nephiliam
Anna speaks of the proof she’s seen of craft and biologicals.
Dunno. Just came to me.
“Woke”...”waking” up to UFO’s...
Seems to go together.
Low IQ article.
I don’t think it was zp3cious at all. Extraord8nary claims will need evidence to back them up beyond a reasonable doubt. It doesn’t mean “irrefutable 100% proof”, but rather “beyond reasonable doubt proof”. The Bible has much that relies on enough evidence to provide a beyond reasonable doubt proof even though it can’t produce 100% irrefutable proof.
Best to just ignore the wags and blatteroons.
“Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof”
I have yet to see a decent photo of any of the UFO things. Gotta watch out for AI concoctions here.
Would you believe in them when I3 Atlas at 10.5km diameter changes course and comes out from behind the Sun, headed directly for Earth in an indirect attack?
streaming.lamarzulli.net
“Being There”
A Favorite!
.
Chauncey finished Walking on Water.
“Extraord8nary claims will need evidence to back them up beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Correct. And that can take the form of a simple fact.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.