Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/07/2025 1:42:01 PM PDT by frogjerk
Here is an old newscast I found regarding the Current Population Survey (Household Survey) from 1994 when they revamped the questions. It is very interesting in how they were able to get a 95% response rate back then and now only currently 66%. Enjoy.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Why don’t we have a census with a snap shot of all the counties in the US, and then apportion ONE Representative per county? Would it work?
Isn’t this the one that a lot of people refuse to answer because they consider it too intrusive?
We had more trust in the gubmit then. But after the Clinton/Biden/Dorkbama days of putridness, that went the way of the audience for Mad Cow.
No, it would not work.
There is no standardized U.S. designation of “county”.
Different methods have been used across the country.
For instance, Georgia has 159 counties.
Counties are all over the place in terms of population.
Re: post 3: Sorry; I’m thinking of the American Community Survey.
Because the House is apportioned on a population count, not a county count. Harris County in Texas has millions of people (4,698,619), but Liberty County has a fraction (86,323). You’d have to give Harris County 54 representatives to give Liberty County 1.
The issue is when you jigger the boundaries on ‘black’, ‘brown’, etc. neighborhoods.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.