Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia Just Built a Plasma Engine That Could Reach Mars in 30 Days—SpaceX’s Biggest Problem Yet?
Daily Galaxy ^ | August 07, 2025 | Arezki Amiri

Posted on 08/07/2025 11:00:04 AM PDT by Red Badger

Russian scientists say they’ve built a new kind of engine that could cut the trip to Mars down to just one month. A working prototype already exists, and it’s unlike anything currently used in space.

=============================================================

Russia’s New Plasma Engine. Credit: IZVESTIA/Sergey Lantyukhov | The Daily Galaxy --Great Discoveries Channel

=============================================================

A new propulsion system developed by Russian scientists is generating buzz in the spaceflight community. According to researchers from Rosatom’s Troitsk Institute, a laboratory-tested magnetoplasma engine could make it possible to travel from Earth to Mars in as little as one to two months—a significant leap from today’s six- to nine-month missions.

Continuous Acceleration, Not Combustion

At the center of this technology is a plasma propulsion system that abandons conventional fuel combustion. Instead, it uses electromagnetic fields to accelerate hydrogen ions—charged particles like protons and electrons—to speeds of 100 kilometers per second (about 360,000 km/h). For comparison, most chemical rockets top out at around 4.5 km/s due to fuel burn limitations.

“The working body is charged particles that are accelerated by an electromagnetic field. This makes it possible to achieve much higher speeds,” said Alexei Voronov, first deputy general director for science at the Troitsk Institute, speaking to Izvestia.

Magnetoplasma Propulsion System - Image Credit: IZVESTIA/Sergey Lantyukhov

This kind of engine works on continuous thrust. Unlike current rockets that provide an initial push and then coast, this plasma engine keeps accelerating steadily. That means shorter travel times and less time spent in deep space radiation—a major concern for long-duration crewed missions.

Built and Already Being Tested

What makes this project different from others in development is that a working prototype already exists. Researchers have constructed a test unit and are running it inside a massive vacuum chamber—4 meters wide and 14 meters long—that mimics outer space conditions. The engine operates in a pulse-periodic mode, running at 300 kilowatts of power.

The current system has shown an operational lifespan of 2,400 hours, enough for a round trip to Mars under the proposed design. “The main goal of the project is to demonstrate the operation of the prototype in pulse-periodic mode,” said Konstantin Gutorov, the project’s scientific advisor.

Magnetoplasma Propulsion System - Image Credit: IZVESTIA/Sergey Lantyukhov

A space-ready version is planned for release in 2030, and will not replace traditional launch vehicles. Instead, it would kick in after the spacecraft reaches orbit, allowing the plasma engine to handle the journey through interplanetary space.

Hydrogen: Abundant, Light, and Efficient

The choice of hydrogen as a fuel source is intentional. It’s the lightest and most abundant element in the universe, allowing for high acceleration with minimal consumption. More importantly, the design doesn’t require high plasma temperatures, reducing heat stress on engine parts and improving longevity.

The engine’s 6 newtons of thrust may not sound like much, but it’s actually the highest among plasma-based propulsion projects currently in development. That’s because plasma engines prioritize efficiency over brute force, trading raw power for steady, long-term acceleration and deceleration—essential for interplanetary missions.

Magnetoplasma Propulsion System - Image Credit: IZVESTIA/Sergey Lantyukhov

Power for the engine would likely come from a nuclear reactor onboard the spacecraft, which introduces some engineering and safety challenges, but also provides the sustained energy needed for continuous operation.

How It Stacks up Against Today’s Tech

Plasma propulsion isn’t new. Russian plasma thrusters are already used in systems like the OneWeb satellite constellation and NASA’s Psyche probe. Those engines typically achieve particle exhaust speeds of 10 to 50 km/s. The new engine claims to double that range, placing it far ahead of current technology, if the results can be independently verified.

“This development is ahead of the curve,” said Nathan Eismont of the Russian Academy of Sciences, who emphasized that Russian-made plasma engines are already flying on international missions.

Of course, this doesn’t mean a Mars trip is right around the corner. The system hasn’t been reviewed in independent scientific journals, and its integration into a complete space mission has yet to be demonstrated. But the prototype’s existence and ongoing testing signal real momentum, not just theoretical speculation.


TOPICS: Astronomy; History; Military/Veterans; Travel
KEYWORDS: adastra; aerospace; aviation; interplanetary; mars; nuclear; nuclearpower; plasma; plasmathruster; russia; spacetravel; vasimr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: TexasGator

The prototype is. They didn’t want it to leave the building..............😏


21 posted on 08/07/2025 11:17:57 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy

In space, what goes fast must slow down


22 posted on 08/07/2025 11:18:21 AM PDT by rdcbn1 (..when poets buy guns, tourist season is over................Walter R. Mead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

In the long history of Russia it has given the world two remarkable things. Great authors and great scientists. The other millions are but winnowed chaff.


23 posted on 08/07/2025 11:20:02 AM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Charged particles like protons and electrons.

Sounds like it can make a big flash if need be?.


24 posted on 08/07/2025 11:21:20 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Sounds like a spaceship for an ectoplasm!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNZEozMK6ok&ab_channel=BOBFOREMAN


25 posted on 08/07/2025 11:21:50 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Well, maybe not on purpose.................


26 posted on 08/07/2025 11:23:09 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Russian scientists say...”

That and $12 will buy a coffee at Starbucks...


27 posted on 08/07/2025 11:23:41 AM PDT by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists-Satanists: redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Amazon has one on sale, with overnight delivery.


28 posted on 08/07/2025 11:23:57 AM PDT by Highest Authority (DemonRats are pure EVIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Russia flew US astronauts to the International Space Station for years after NASA cancelled the shuttle program and had no ready replacement. Had Space X, a private company, not been able to develop reliable manned space flight capability quickly, the US would still be paying Russia exorbitant sums to fly our astronauts to the space station or we would have abandoned the station by now. Despite billions more given by NASA to Boeing than Space X for manned space flights, Boeing has yet to get its Starliner qualified.

The Russian government continues to invest heavily in rocket technology, as does the Chinese government. While the US wastes billions on defense contractor grift, our adversaries are pouring money into pure research to develop technologies that leapfrog our capabilities. It is foolish to underestimate their determination and emerging capabilities.


29 posted on 08/07/2025 11:24:26 AM PDT by Soul of the South (The past is gone and cannot be changed. Tomorrow can be a better day if we work on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

30 posted on 08/07/2025 11:26:28 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That’s all right. NASA’s way ahead of the Russians in the all important category of DEI.


31 posted on 08/07/2025 11:31:18 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

IIRC, NASA considered a plasma engine years ago and discarded it as a means of propulsion because of budget constraints.............

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_propulsion_engine


32 posted on 08/07/2025 11:31:31 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
“Russian scientists say … “

They gave a run for the money during the space race, made their own nuclear weapons, and were the source of the Periodic Table of the Elements. Russians have contributed much more to science than I suppose you know.

33 posted on 08/07/2025 11:33:53 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
Slowing down uses quite a bit of energy as well.

Flip and burn at the halfway point.

34 posted on 08/07/2025 11:34:33 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

However, acquiring enough blood to get to mars and back will be impossible.


35 posted on 08/07/2025 11:34:44 AM PDT by Gary from Dayton (Army Vet 1986-1991 unburdened by what I was burdened by before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

What? Why should my tax dollars go to build something extremely expensive and full of cost overruns and extended timelines (government) when private enterprises can do it cheaper, better and quicker?

SpaceX, Blue Origin, Virgin Space, etc. are all a better way than stupid government, especially Russia and China!


36 posted on 08/07/2025 11:36:02 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

will need to carry the equivalent of a 300 kilowatt power plant weighing 3-5 tons and 1.8 million liters of diesel for one round trip ... plus the payload ...


37 posted on 08/07/2025 11:37:28 AM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

When I first held a hand grenade, I knew I would enjoy throwing it. I certainly did. Boys and toys.


38 posted on 08/07/2025 11:37:35 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Did you know that during the Soviet days half their aerospace scientists and engineers were Ukrainian?


39 posted on 08/07/2025 11:37:50 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Or 300 solar panels..............


40 posted on 08/07/2025 11:38:25 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson