... in the Epstein case, no evidence was uncovered that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.

https://x.com/AGPamBondi/status/1947622027587723365 ^ | July 22, 2025 | AG Pam Bondi

[Racketeer]

I wonder what changed? Last weeks excuse now gives Maxwell a ticket out. In exchange for her testimony, she will be released.

This is unconscionable and more proof of the sickness within our leadership.

[ClearCase_guy]

no evidence was uncovered that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.

I didn't see it in 2022 when Maxwell was convicted, but the writing was right there on the wall --

Maxwell procured, Epstein abused. She's in jail. He's dead. We're done. No one else was ever involved in anything. The verdict against Maxwell spelled this all out. It was a two person operation. Full stop.

The government had this one tied up with a bow three years ago. We just didn't get the memo.

[uranium penguin]

I’d take Ghislane getting out in exchange for naming ALL of the pedos.

[Leaning Right]

And now a word from George Carlin:

[FreedomPoster]

The Deep State has had ~6 years to sanitize what was found, including 4 while Dopey was “President”. And the year and a half during Trump45, the DOJ/FBI could not be said to be fully under Trump’s control.

If you have evidence that can be used to prosecute Epstein Island visitors, get it out there, tell us all about it.

[bigbob]

We also didn’t get the totality of evidence that existed back then. Anyone who thinks the FBI/DOJ wouldn’t have destroyed anything hasn’t been paying attention.

[Sacajaweau]

Naming and proving is two different things. We don’t want 100 libel lawsuits. Just because someone showed up at Epstein’s places doesn’t mean you had sex with a minor.

[M. Thatcher]

In exchange for her testimony, she will be released.

You made that up.

[RummyChick]

Laura Loomer
@LauraLoomer
·
1h
Today’s statement by Pam Bondi seems like a massive cope. Why wasn’t this “interview” with Ghislaine Maxwell done on day 1?

I guess what I want to know is whether the DOJ is basically saying they have never met with Ghislaine Maxwell to ask her or interview her about whether she has information about sex crimes committed against minors…

Shouldn’t they have already done this?

Maybe there is a mix up in communication. But I just can’t help but wonder whether or not this has already happened. And if not, why?
Quote
Laura Loomer
@LauraLoomer
·
JUST IN: Pam Bondi says the DOJ & FBI are open to meeting with Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell to discuss whether or not she has information about people who have committed sex crimes against minors.

[nitzy]

I will bet a months pay that he doesn’t ask her why she thinks her father’s funeral was attended by 6 current and former heads of Israeli intelligence.

[RummyChick]

I have been paying attention and they have not destroyed everything. They can’t.

Yes, someone ..ahem..CIA...or uh..a “technical glitch” destroyed all of Alex Acosta’s incoming emails as it regards the sweetheart deal with Epstein that happened under the Bush Admin. Even though they claim it happened to more than one person it would have been easy for CIA to do it to more than one so as not to look suspicious.

There are still plenty of files that could be accessed including the transcript of the interview with OPR.

The Trump Admin itself knows whether or not Acosta said Epstein belonged to intelligence. Read that sentence again.

A CIA name trace should have been done. Where is it? If they didn’t do it, then do it.

FINCEN. Treasury has an Epstein file.

there are avenues to pursue.

[Chewbarkah]

“in the Epstein case, no evidence was uncovered that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.,”

That could be a true statement, even if a ton of evidence of crimes by third parties exist, IF the Statutes of Limitation have run out.

Whether SoLs come into play depends on the specific crimes, the states where they occurred, when they occurred.

[RummyChick]

or why he was buried at Mount Olives.

I dont know anything about the place other than a blurb I saw where it allows you to be first in line for the resurrection.

He was a british citizen. Not sure any ole british citizen can be buried there.

the writer for Tomorrow Never dies said Maxwell was the inspiration for the Bond Villain

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Naming and proving is two different things. We don’t want 100 libel lawsuits. Just because someone showed up at Epstein’s places doesn’t mean you had sex with a minor.

Bingo. At a bare minimum, you'd need the victim willing to provide concrete, sworn testimony regarding sexual acts they committed with the specific accused. My guess is that is the biggest roadblock they have regarding prosecuting any additional parties.

Most of them, to the extent they could identify the guy, likely wants nothing further to do with this, doesn't want the publicity, and won't cooperate.

[Jan_Sobieski]

I will bet a months pay that he doesn’t ask her why she thinks her father’s funeral was attended by 6 current and former heads of Israeli intelligence.

How many CIA heads attended?

[Flaming Conservative]

Just because someone showed up at Epstein’s places doesn’t mean you had sex with a minor.

---

That’s true. They could interview the victims, whose testimony, of course, would have to be adjudicated in a court of law. It will take years and years to get through all that, but criminals need to be held accountable, and this dirty, nasty underbelly needs to be exposed. What a mess.

[The Louiswu]

[Jane Long]

Ha! Posting known lefty memes, we see.

Not a good look, Wu.

[linedrive]

I would only if indictments were obtained - a conviction on anyone is a bridge too far for anyone to expect. So disappointing, disgusting and destructive.

[nitzy]

None that I know of....enlighten me if I am wrong. I am always eager to learn new truths.