Insanity.
Doesn’t make sense.
If that’s what they vote for, they deserve it.
> Mamdani leads Cuomo among voters with income over $100,000 by 20 points, with 60 percent to Cuomo’s 40 percent. <
File this under “Money does not equal intelligence.”
Anyway, as Sacajaweau noted, this doesn’t make sense. Could the results be skewed by inherited wealth?
The wealthy are the last to suffer for their idiotic political beliefs.
Socialism has always been a plan of the elite: 1) to keep economic risers and challengers down, and 2) to deflect possible blame for the disparate wealth.
100k is not (really at all) wealthy in NYC.
The wealthy can simply board a private jet with their millions and escape the disasters they create.
The voter turnout is less than 10% in certain categories. The socialists will always out vote the apathetic voters who don’t bother. NYC is in trouble.
We need a wall around NYC.
How can either one of these losers be a considered a viable candidate?
645 voters , not very many ,sounds like a scam ,LOL
I wish only the worst for Democrats...
Trophy wives are responding to these polls - the actual wealth creators can’t be bothered.
Lots of voters(insane ones) will pity Iran and vote for the muslim thinking it will be so great the world will love us, LOL
$100K in NYC does not make you wealthy by any stretch of the imagination.
That said, I think it’s pretty clear that “progressivism” isn’t the ideology of the working class, but of those who abuse the working class. They want to “progress” toward a world where those types of deplorable people no longer need to be seen, heard, or even exist.
>>Mamdani leads Cuomo among voters with income over $100,000 by 20 points
$100k/year is poverty wages in NYC; hardly “the wealthiest voters”
Apparently, the media wants to play this you cannot be too liberal even for a very Jewish new York. As a previous state wide machine vanadate, the giant Q-TIP should be clearing the field. As a primary in NY, it really is about as valid weighing of the electorate. As the straw pole at the Iowa Fair and I don’t know if turnout is larger than the number of city employees, what we call in Chicago, the Byrne Line.
I worked in NYC 1974-1982 and was back many times on business and pleasure in the decades after
I am so glad I got to see “the city” before it collapsed. Even the going bankrupt era and pre-Giuliani days were many times better than what I see and read about today.
Well, if Newsweak says it, it has to be true, right?!