Posted on 06/24/2025 6:24:32 AM PDT by Red Badger
Human footprints at White Sands National Park in New Mexico, reported in 2021, show that human activity occurred in the Americas as long as 23,000 years ago – about 10,000 years earlier than previously thought. A new U of A study supports the 2021 findings. Credit: David Bustos/White Sands National Park
======================================================================
Evidence buried in gypsum dunes suggests humans arrived far earlier than expected. Radiocarbon dates from three materials agree.
Vance Holliday quickly accepted an invitation to do geological research at White Sands in New Mexico. The area, located just west of Alamogordo, is known for its surreal landscape—endless rolling dunes of fine beige gypsum left behind by ancient seas. It is considered one of the most unique geological formations in the world.
However, much of the region is protected as a national park, and a nearby section is used by the U.S. Army as a missile range, which often limits access for researchers. Despite this, Holliday, an archaeologist and geologist from the University of Arizona, took the opportunity to begin research in the park in 2012. While there, he asked—more out of curiosity than expectation—if he could visit a site located on the missile range.
“Well, next thing I know, there we were on the missile range,” he said.
Holliday and a graduate student spent several days studying the geologic layers exposed in trenches that had been dug by earlier researchers, hoping to build a clearer timeline of the area’s history. What they didn’t realize was that just about 100 yards away, footprints preserved in ancient clay and buried beneath gypsum would soon challenge long-standing beliefs about when humans first arrived in the Americas.
Footprint discovery sparks global interest
Researchers from Bournemouth University in the United Kingdom and the U.S. National Park Service excavated the footprints in 2019 and published their findings in 2021. Although Holliday was not involved in the excavation itself, he became a co-author after data he collected in 2012 helped determine the age of the prints.
The tracks indicated that humans were present in the area between 23,000 and 21,000 years ago, a timeframe that challenges long-held beliefs about when cultures first appeared in North America. This would make the footprints roughly 10,000 years older than the remains discovered near Clovis, New Mexico, a site that defined what was long considered the continent’s earliest known culture. Since the 2021 publication, critics have questioned the findings, primarily arguing that the ancient seeds and pollen used for dating were not reliable indicators.
New study confirms original dates
Now, Holliday leads a new study that supports the 2021 findings – this time relying on ancient mud to radiocarbon date the footprints, not seeds and pollen, and an independent lab to make the analysis. The paper was published in the journal Science Advances.
Specifically, the new paper finds that the mud is between 20,700 and 22,400 years old – which correlates with the original finding that the footprints are between 21,000 and 23,000 years old. The new study now marks the third type of material – mud in addition to seeds and pollen – used to date the footprints, and by three different labs. Two separate research groups now have a total of 55 consistent radiocarbon dates.
“It’s a remarkably consistent record,” said Holliday, a professor emeritus in the School of Anthropology and Department of Geosciences who has studied the “peopling of the Americas” for nearly 50 years, focusing largely on the Great Plains and the Southwest.
“You get to the point where it’s really hard to explain all this away,” he added. “As I say in the paper, it would be serendipity in the extreme to have all these dates giving you a consistent picture that’s in error.”
Millennia ago, White Sands was a series of lakes that eventually dried up. Wind erosion piled the gypsum into the dunes that define the area today. The footprints were excavated in the beds of a stream that flowed into one such ancient lake.
“The wind erosion destroyed part of the story, so that part is just gone,” Holliday said. “The rest is buried under the world’s biggest pile of gypsum sand.”
For the latest study, Holliday and Jason Windingstad, a doctoral candidate in environmental science, returned to White Sands in 2022 and 2023 and dug a new series of trenches for a closer look at the geology of the lake beds. Windingstad had worked at White Sands as a consulting geoarchaeologist for other research teams when he agreed to join Holliday’s study.
A challenge to everything they were taught
“It’s a strange feeling when you go out there and look at the footprints and see them in person,” Windingstad said. “You realize that it basically contradicts everything that you’ve been taught about the peopling of North America.”
Holliday acknowledges that the new study doesn’t address a question he’s heard from critics since 2021: Why are there no signs of artifacts or settlements left behind by those who made the footprints?
It’s a fair question, Holliday and Windingstad said, and Holliday still does not have a peer-reviewed answer. Some of the footprints uncovered for the 2021 study were part of trackways that would have taken just a few seconds to walk, Holliday estimates. It’s perfectly reasonable, he said, to assume that hunter-gatherers would be careful not to leave behind any resources in such a short time frame.
“These people live by their artifacts, and they were far away from where they can get replacement material. They’re not just randomly dropping artifacts,” he said. “It’s not logical to me that you’re going to see a debris field.”
Even though he was confident in the 2021 findings to begin with, Holliday said, he’s glad to have more data to support them.
“I really had no doubt from the outset because the dating we had was already consistent,” Holliday said. “We have direct data from the field – and a lot of it now.”
Reference:
“Paleolake geochronology supports Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) age for human tracks at White Sands, New Mexico”
by Vance T. Holliday, Jason D. Windingstad, Jordon Bright, Bruce G. Phillips, Joel B. Butler, Ryan Breslawski and James E. Bowman, 18 June 2025, Science Advances.
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adv4951
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
PinGGG!.................
It makes zero sense to think that the America’s were not populated around the same time as the rest of the world. I think if you could cut down the jungles of South America you would find a LOT of evidence of human life dating back thousands of years.
There are other sites with evidence of pre-Clovis culture. This is one of the best dated ones, because of the clearly human footprints and the multiple dating methods.
Grizzly bears did not make it south of Canada until about 13000 years ago, roughly the same time as the Clovis culture.
This was during the last ice age. The coasts were much different. The people probably reached south of the glaciers by boats, moving along the coast.
Most of the population was probably along the coasts, and the sites are under hundreds of feet of water.
Bears follow the food trucks.................
I’m going to be buried with some 1815 silver dollars and some 2025 quarters so the edumacated researchers will know I was at least 210 years old.
EC
The Earth is old. Period. I love finds like this. Interesting.
White Sands isn’t the place I’d go to looking for footprints.
And while it looks like it’s covered with snow, you can’t make a snowman there.
True. Some have already been found..............
With that stride length, he must have been about 2 feet tall. Those are big feet for such a little guy.
I gotta call BS on this. They ‘carbon dated’ ancient mud to determine the age of the footprints.
Sure, ok.....
That’s what I used to say about our sugar white sand here...
Until this past January...............
are they sure that number isn't 23, 638 or 4,733 years ago ? darwinist theorists...spit.
I watched Desert Drifter and The Trek Planner on youtube a lot. I wouldn’t want to live in a desert, but I love them exploring it and finding all the petroglyphs. I usually watch just before bed to wind down. They find some amazing history out there.
Sadly Desert Drifter was recently killed in a car accident, but I still watch to help with views.
LOL. Bigfoot strikes again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
