what’s Mark hiding?
he’s dancing - for who?
I believe:
Speeding up the end to the war will actually also speed up the demise of Putin. People don’t understand how that region works.
Is what Mark Levin thinks, particularly, relevant?
Sorry people. Levin is just another lawyer! He called me every name possible when I tried to tell him his support for Liz Cheney was ass backwards. He was dead set against Trump when he was dating Cruz’s hired help.
Empowering Zelensky is inadvertently strengthening, not weakening Putin’s grip to unabated rule in Russia. End the war and you’ll see the cards fall and land in due season - Putin can’t use war to unite/distract his country anymore.
He does have a point. I think it would be hilarious if Trump came out and said, “We aren’t getting involved in anyone else’s election or regime change or anything like. Putin wants Z to have elections as a condition. I think that is rich. He doesn’t even have free elections in his own country. So this negotiation and peace deal will have nothing to do with anyone’s elections.
I never liked Levin. He’s a poser, not to be trusted.
Mark who?
He’s allowed to have his opinion. It is possible that both sides are messed up. In that case, and end to the war is best for all. Ukraine is going to lose some land. That happens in war.
Frankly, I would have been happy to let Iraq keep Kuwait. They weren’t our ally, and they weren’t worth U.S. lives.
Levin used to be an anti-Trump stooge. He used to call anyone who questioned Obama’s Birth or his citizenship a KOOK. Levin thinks Wong Kim Ark is settled law when it comes to birthright citizenship. He says Wong Kim Ark is a natural born Citizen.
It’s KGB, Mark…
I’m torn here because I feel Ukraine should be a defensible American position that was botched horribly (if not outright started) by American interference.
That said, I don’t know how you fix anything without going to either extreme of abandonment or doubling down on the war and I’ll go with the former as the saner alternative.
Mark should scream this message over and over and over and over and over on his Sunday night Fox timeslot.
I wish Mark Levin would show up here (again) and answer what’s Un-American about it? The very Founding fathers of the US had a similar policy. “Entangling alliances” they called it?
__________________
When Levin goes off the deep end, he goes all the way. Who can forget how he ragged on the Trump campaign the first time around?
Levin’s a loud mouthed turd-sniffer. He even screams in his books which makes them too annoying to bother with.
Is Mark on the take?
This entire thread is filled with nonesense.
The war is also nonsensical also, as well as the entire region and our relations with Ukraine and Russia, but here we are.
This is my first hint that Levin may be the recipient of USAID money.
I always enjoy hearing Levin’s perspective. But I think sometimes he strays into the land of hyperbole and it undermines his argument.
Levin came of age during the Cold War and served in the Reagan admin. Thus, I completely understand his disdain for Putin, a Soviet Cold Warrior serving the KGB.
But we aren’t sending Putin military aid and claiming to support a democracy. We are sending it yo Ukraine claiming to support a democracy which hasn’t been one in sometime.