To: where's_the_Outrage?
I liked the jazzy interpretation because it represented New Orleans music.
2 posted on
02/10/2025 7:05:27 AM PST by
quilterdebbie
(We will endeavor to persevere!)
To: quilterdebbie
5 posted on
02/10/2025 7:11:51 AM PST by
NautiNurse
(Beulah is the name Hillary! gave to her roly-poly belly blubber. TMI. )
To: quilterdebbie
Well within the range of acceptable renditions. I liked it
6 posted on
02/10/2025 7:13:08 AM PST by
j.havenfarm
(24 years on Free Republic, 12/10/24! More than 10,500 replies and still not shutting up!)
To: quilterdebbie
Our national anthem should be sung in reverence. It is not some jazz standard to vocally riff over.
10 posted on
02/10/2025 7:15:42 AM PST by
Right Brother
(I don't really care Margaret.)
To: quilterdebbie
“I liked the jazzy interpretation because it represented New Orleans music.”
Agree. Batiste’s version was very good, very classy and very smooth.
To: quilterdebbie
14 posted on
02/10/2025 7:17:28 AM PST by
Huskrrrr
(Alinsky, you magnificent Bastard, I read your book!)
To: quilterdebbie
The National Athem was never meant to be jazzed up!
21 posted on
02/10/2025 7:22:24 AM PST by
ABStrauss
(I miss Rush!)
To: quilterdebbie
It’s the National Anthem...not the New Orleans Anthem. It was crap...
To: quilterdebbie
I liked it for the same reason. Also, as far as I can tell, he is a really nice guy.
To: quilterdebbie
I loved it too. It wasn’t overly lengthy. Not a lot of vamping. Just a jazzy, solid pace. And very well sung.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson