Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump on collision course with conservatives over debt limit [Sen. Rand Paul Quoted]
The Hill ^ | 12/30/24 6:00 AM ET | by Alexander Bolton

Posted on 12/31/2024 8:36:05 PM PST by RandFan

President-elect Trump is headed for a battle over the debt limit with conservative lawmakers who are demanding steep cuts to federal spending that will significantly complicate Trump’s ability to pass his agenda next year.

Thirty-eight House Republicans sent a warning to Trump last week by rejecting his demand to extend the nation’s borrowing authority for two years, casting doubt on Trump’s influence over GOP conservatives.

Conservatives now say Trump will need to agree to deep cuts in spending if he wants their support for raising the debt limit in 2025.

“We’re about 33 percent overdrawn. We bring in about $4.8 trillion [in revenue] and spend $6.8 trillion [per year], so you got to get about $2 trillion worth of spending down,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said.

Paul hailed the defeat of Trump’s plan to raise the debt limit as part of a stopgap government funding measure. He said it shows the leverage fiscal hawks will have over the White House next year.

He said there are blocs of conservatives in both chambers who will insist on matching a debt limit increase with big spending cuts.

“That debate’s going to be ongoing. I for one am going to do what I can to make sure the debt ceiling becomes more important,” he said.

Paul called the defeat of Trump’s proposal to raise the debt limit without spending cuts “a good day for conservatives.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: booster; cheerleader; debt; deficit; inflation; randpaulsucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: napscoordinator

While the potential savings in defense are huge, to cut that budget will take many structural changes in procurement. Given that existing multi-year contracts are already in place, it is not a quick thing to cut.


21 posted on 12/31/2024 10:14:49 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

There will be no cuts.

Cuts of any significant amount cannot get 60 votes in the Senate.

And that’s that.


22 posted on 12/31/2024 10:25:46 PM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Government let down
💲to the lobby

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=north+carolina+recovery+efforts&&view=detail&mid=6143CB0FF941AB7EF8F46143CB0FF941AB7EF8F4&&FORM=VRDGAR


23 posted on 12/31/2024 10:37:49 PM PST by Varsity Flight ( "War by 🙏 the prophesies set before you." I Timothy 1:18. Nazarite warriors. 10.5.6.5 These Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Varsity Flight

1:13 government.....


24 posted on 12/31/2024 10:40:53 PM PST by Varsity Flight ( "War by 🙏 the prophesies set before you." I Timothy 1:18. Nazarite warriors. 10.5.6.5 These Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Its All Over Except ...; All

The current annual federal budget deficit is $100 billion more than ALL the discretionary spending including 100% of the defense budget and ICE/border patrol, etc., etc..

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60419

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/18/us-deficit-tops-1point8-trillion-in-2024-as-interest-on-debt-surpasses-trillion-dollar-mark.html

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/59729


25 posted on 12/31/2024 10:53:11 PM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

The potential savings to health care are even greater — when we (can) stop spending several times more on diabetes alone than the entire defense budget.


26 posted on 12/31/2024 10:55:22 PM PST by erlayman (E )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Drago

At least $400 billion a year is spent on corporate welfare.


27 posted on 12/31/2024 11:16:00 PM PST by Its All Over Except ...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

I would like to stop spending the country into inflation oblivion.


28 posted on 12/31/2024 11:32:06 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

I’d be fine with spending a trillion or two to expel 50 million illegals, but that’s probably not where most of the immediate spending would go.


29 posted on 12/31/2024 11:52:25 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Its All Over Except ...

Define “corporate welfare”.
(And keep in mind that choosing to not tax or lowering a tax on a particular type of industry/corporation is not “welfare”).

If you mean subsidies then I agree that could be included in the term “welfare”.


30 posted on 12/31/2024 11:55:23 PM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Climate Change cr** should ALL be eliminated.


31 posted on 01/01/2025 12:09:46 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Elected politicians are addicted to spending other peoples money. The question for the nation is how does one end an addition? Do you do it by going “cold turkey?” Do you end it by gradually tapering off, but know it will take longer?

Medically, it depends on how healthy and physically strong the patient is. So how strong and healthy is the US and World economy? Those are the questions that need to be publicly debated.

I see Trump’s proposal as being a quick, but tapering off of the addictive overspending. I see others as wanting to go cold turkey. I see Democrats as wanting to keep spending and kick the can down the road to be resolved another day.

I am old enough to remember LBJ’s “guns and butter” Great Society concept on spending. Prior to that wars were financed with war bond drives. The USA is now financing proxy wars around the world without selling any “war bonds.” We are also expanding entitlements left and right, regardless of affordability.

I was once in WA DC lobbying because Congress forgot one year to include as a business tax deduction that was expiring a continuation of business being able to treat employee education expenses as tax deductible. In the process of my sincere arguments, a Senator told me that tax deduction (like many others) can never be made permanent. The reason was that under Congressional Budget Office projections temporary tax cuts that end within 7 future years are removed from revenue/deficit projections. So Congress uses an accounting trick of temporary tax cuts to not face the true projected fiscal deficit. Congress uses every trick possible to deceive the public and themselves of the financial problems we face. Just look at Social Security, public pensions, interest on the national debt.


32 posted on 01/01/2025 12:23:43 AM PST by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357; marcusmaximus; Paul R.; Bruce Campbells Chin; PIF; familyop; MercyFlush; tet68; ...

Ukraine ping

Robert357: [I am old enough to remember LBJ’s “guns and butter” Great Society concept on spending. Prior to that wars were financed with war bond drives. The USA is now financing proxy wars around the world without selling any “war bonds.” We are also expanding entitlements left and right, regardless of affordability.]


War bonds were needed for WW1 and WW2 because those were enormous efforts. 50% of the economy (not the Federal budget - the entire economy) per year for WW1 and 40% of the economy per year for WW2. Vietnam was desultory, costing about 2.5% of the economy per year. Ukraine is tiny compared to Vietnam, at 0.25% of the economy per year. For reference, the current military budget is 3% of the economy.


33 posted on 01/01/2025 1:38:48 AM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

“You idiots!

What do you think DOGE is all about???”

All the more reason to view Trump’s agenda to raise the ceiling as a mixed signal and contradiction.

You can’t claim to want lower spending by wanting the ability to spend more. It is absolutely illogical, irrational, and questionable. It makes no sense at all...


34 posted on 01/01/2025 2:51:40 AM PST by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

So are you one of those idiots that thinks “tax cuts must be paid for”?


35 posted on 01/01/2025 3:04:56 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Its All Over Except ...
No, use DOGE to reduce all the other gov’t by half, get rid off all corporate welfare (4X as much as is spent oj food stamps and Medicaid), end H1-b, find all fraud and abuse in social welfare spending, tell Europe they can handle Putin all together militarily (and they can) then reduce military spending by 20%.

Good, but you forgot one thing, a 10% import tariff that will bring a Trillion every 2 or 3 years....

36 posted on 01/01/2025 3:06:54 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Nope you are actually just a political idiot thinking offering up bad advise will somehow help his politically dead god DeSantis

Grow up, it is over. Trump won, you lost.


37 posted on 01/01/2025 3:07:21 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Don't blame me, my congressman is MTG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

I would say that a 10% import tariff that when directly to fund SS and MC would be in order. End MC.


38 posted on 01/01/2025 3:08:11 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

This should be easy. Take every state with two Democrat senators that has voted “blue” in the last three presidential elections and slash any appropriations for their Democratic House districts.


39 posted on 01/01/2025 3:11:30 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Well, maybe I'm a little rough around the edges; inside a little hollow.” -- Tom Petty, “Rebels”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

When has the Debt Ceiling ever been enforced by any Congress?

It a useless bit of political posting by the political dogmatics to pretend they are “doing something” while actually being totally worthless except as a tool to force a GOP President to sign bad emergency CRs or crash the US Economy.

Like it or not real world US politics do not work the way Conservative Inc think it does. Useless political posturing about “the Debt Ceiling” by certain narcissists Congress critters, while doing NOTHING to actually reign in spending, is infantile.

It make Conservative Inc all giddy while actually doing nothing at all to contain spending.

How about you all stop mindlessly squealing for useless gesutrues and start demanding your Congress start actually DOING IT JOB for a change


40 posted on 01/01/2025 3:15:28 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Don't blame me, my congressman is MTG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson