Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3,775-Year-Old Log Sparks New Solution to Climate Change
Scitech Daily ^ | October 12, 2024 | American Association for the Advancement of Science

Posted on 10/12/2024 4:55:14 PM PDT by Red Badger

Researchers propose using “wood vaults” to store carbon by burying wood to prevent decomposition, potentially sequestering up to 10 gigatons of CO2 annually. Further study is needed to assess the method’s environmental impacts and scalability.

Inspired by the discovery of an ancient buried log, researchers have developed a new method to capture and store atmospheric carbon for centuries. The technique involves sealing woody biomass in “wood vaults,” offering a potentially cost-effective way to combat climate change.

Achieving net-zero carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is crucial for combating climate change, yet reducing fossil fuel emissions alone is insufficient to meet the Paris Agreement’s targets. To achieve these goals, carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods must be implemented, including engineering solutions, like direct air capture, and nature-based approaches, such as reforestation or afforestation. Forests play a crucial role in the climate change discourse as significant carbon sinks in natural carbon cycles, sequestering atmospheric carbon through photosynthesis.

Limitations of Natural Carbon Storage However, the carbon stored in wood via this natural carbon cycle is often quickly returned to the atmosphere due to decomposition or burning of biomass, leaving little net impact on atmospheric carbon. It is unknown whether carbon-storing woody biomass can be preserved long enough (hundreds of years or longer) to have an appreciable effect on reducing anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere.

Here, Ning Zeng and colleagues explore the viability of a CDR strategy involving burying sustainably sourced wood in an engineered structure called a “wood vault” to prolong the duration of carbon storage by preventing decay and decomposition. This novel method was inspired by the discovery of a remarkably preserved 3775-year-old Eastern red cedar log buried in clay soil in Quebec, Canada – a find that demonstrates the potential for long-term carbon storage through wood burial within certain environments.

Research Findings and Carbon Storage Potential By comparing the ancient log to a modern sample from the same species, Zeng et al. found that, despite being buried for nearly 4 millennia, the ancient wood had only lost up to 5% of its carbon, likely due to the low permeability and anoxic nature of the compact clay soil in which it was buried. Using carbon cycle modeling and forestry data, the authors estimate that up to 10 gigatons of CO2 could be sequestered via wood vaulting annually, using trees as well as underutilized wood residues, such as urban tree waste and forest byproducts from commercial thinning.

The authors also estimated an initial CDR cost of only $100 to $200 per ton. “A full life-cycle assessment is needed to quantify the net emissions and environmental impacts across ecosystems, supply chains, and engineered wood vaults, as well as to understand how these impacts vary by location and wood sources,” writes Yuan Yao in a related Perspective. “These understandings will be critical to developing biomass burial projects on a global scale.”

Reference:

“3775-year-old wood burial supports “wood vaulting” as a durable carbon removal method” by Ning Zeng, Xinpeng Zhao, Ghislain Poisson, Bryson Clifford, Yu Liu, He Liu, Taotao Meng, Laura Picard, Elisa Zeng-Mariotti, Ben Zaitchik and Liangbing Hu, 26 September 2024, Science.

DOI: 10.1126/science.adm8133


TOPICS: Agriculture; Business/Economy; Food; History
KEYWORDS: bronzeage; c14; carbondioxide; carbonpropaganda; centuriesofdarkness; climatehoax; co2; ecoterrorism; ecoterrorists; fakescience; gaslighting; globalwarminghoax; godsgravesglyphs; greennewdeal; kastoria; nikoskokkinos; radiocarbondating
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Red Badger

We can probably get the same reduction of carbon dioxide by planting more trees. Or growing more algae in the ocean. Why hasn’t anyone talked about that lately?

And to think that, twenty-five years ago, NetZero was the name of a free Internet service.


41 posted on 10/13/2024 12:12:40 AM PDT by Berosus (I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berosus

More trees, bttt.


42 posted on 10/13/2024 12:14:40 AM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Is Coal carbon in storage?
We know that coal is old evil stuff.
Why?
What is this article really suggesting?


43 posted on 10/13/2024 12:35:18 PM PDT by BatGuano (Dem's guilty of Election Fraud in 2020, stand by for 2024.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BatGuano

Remove carbon from the atmosphere by burying logs......


44 posted on 10/13/2024 2:16:48 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

🙄


45 posted on 10/13/2024 3:40:46 PM PDT by BiteYourSelf ( Earth first, we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson