Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: TexasKamaAina
Do not forget the house sized foundations for the wind turbines.
They will be there forever.
2 posted on
09/17/2024 2:01:00 PM PDT by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: TexasKamaAina
3 posted on
09/17/2024 2:01:38 PM PDT by
BipolarBob
(my latest Hollywood rejected movie script "Ghostbusters and Mrs. Muir".)
To: TexasKamaAina
The answer lies within the pages of The Fountainhead.
4 posted on
09/17/2024 2:03:33 PM PDT by
GSWarrior
(Don’t ever tell me “it can’t happen here.”)
To: TexasKamaAina
Gasp, depends upon the definition of “beauty”.
There are a few (very few) concrete structures that do not induce nausea.
5 posted on
09/17/2024 2:05:51 PM PDT by
Da Coyote
To: TexasKamaAina
"Beauty" -- ugliest building material ever! It belongs in prestressed floors and bridge abutments.
Here is concrete "Brutalism" at its finest going up in Chicago right now as a grand testament to our greatest and most egotistical president ever...

Wiki -->
One of the earliest reinforced concrete buildings constructed in the United States was the Pacific Coast Borax Company's refinery in Alameda, California, designed by Ernest L. Ransome and built in 1893. It was the first to use ribbed floor construction as well as concrete columns.
It should have stayed a structural material in floors and columns then covered with something beautiful.
6 posted on
09/17/2024 2:06:21 PM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
(May the soy boys, feminazis, and alphabet weirdos choke on the toxic fumes of our masculinity)
To: TexasKamaAina
Concrete makes it so much easier to hide the bodies....

9 posted on
09/17/2024 2:11:46 PM PDT by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: TexasKamaAina
I’ve noticed that all those “Brut” poured-concrete buildings that I associate with my youth have not aged well.
Rust stains, cracks, foggy windows, painted-over graffiti, bird droppings, don’t look good on geometric planes at weird angles and big, blocky cantilevered masses.
The classic-style buildings seem to wear the decades and centuries much better. Their dignity doesn’t seem as easily stained, for some reason.
10 posted on
09/17/2024 2:11:56 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: TexasKamaAina
19 posted on
09/17/2024 2:16:22 PM PDT by
sauropod
("This is a time when people reveal themselves for who they are." James O'Keefe Ne supra crepidam)
To: TexasKamaAina
Two clement pourers walk into rebar...
20 posted on
09/17/2024 2:17:14 PM PDT by
Larry Lucido
(Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
To: TexasKamaAina
The Italians got it right...good for one thing....front stoops.
To: TexasKamaAina
Great article, but I will have to take it in stages.
24 posted on
09/17/2024 2:19:22 PM PDT by
Retain Mike
( Sat Cong)
To: TexasKamaAina
Nothing beats the beauty of East German GDR state apartment blocks. Socialism at its finest.
26 posted on
09/17/2024 2:19:36 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
To: TexasKamaAina
The answer is not the cost of labor.Oh, I beg to differ. The cost of artisanry is incaculable, as is that of good taste and common sense.
28 posted on
09/17/2024 2:23:02 PM PDT by
xoxox
To: TexasKamaAina
Yep, it was Brutalism, among others. The soul crushing design style that flourished amid these soul crushing times.
29 posted on
09/17/2024 2:23:06 PM PDT by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: TexasKamaAina
Very interesting. Thanks for posting!
32 posted on
09/17/2024 2:26:41 PM PDT by
Codeflier
(Don't worry....be happy)
To: TexasKamaAina
My favorite high-rise in Los Angeles was the Richfield Building, which featured ornate artwork and gardens. It was topped with a tall derrick. I wish they had preserved it, as they did the Chrysler Building in NYC, but they scrapped it in 1969 and replaced it with the simple, austere and ugly Arco Towers, which look like two giant cubes.
To: TexasKamaAina
Probably the most famous concrete building on the planet, the Roman Pantheon.

To prevent the walls (and the dome) collapsing under their own weight, they used lighter and lighter aggregate the higher the walls got. At the base they used a limestone called travertine. The aggregate in the top level is volcanic pumice, which weighs about the same a popped popcorn.
At upper left, you can see brickwork arches incorporated into the walls, which they used to transfer the load onto reinforced columns so the concrete beneath the arches could be less robust.
Built in 609 AD, it remains the largest unsupported concrete dome on earth.
To: TexasKamaAina
Because Socialist hate beauty.
41 posted on
09/17/2024 2:34:33 PM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
( Not my circus. Not my monkeys. But I can pick out the clowns at 100 yards.)
To: TexasKamaAina
42 posted on
09/17/2024 2:37:00 PM PDT by
DFG
To: TexasKamaAina
If you suffer from depression, stay away from Montreal in the winter. You may not make it out alive.

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson