Posted on 06/27/2024 1:18:29 PM PDT by Red Badger
A bankruptcy judge on Thursday put on hold an attempt by the parents of a Sandy Hook shooting victim to seize the business bank accounts of the Infowars broadcaster Alex Jones. The ruling by Judge Christopher Lopez was the latest turn in an increasingly acrimonious battle between two groups of Sandy Hook families in Connecticut and Texas fighting to be paid defamation damages from Mr. Jones.
“Let’s just do this with process and transparency,” Judge Lopez said in the hearing, held in Houston. “The last thing I want to do is start hashing out another dispute about two sets of families that have been through enough already.” He proposed to set another hearing in mid-July, when a court-appointed trustee newly in control of Mr. Jones’s personal and business accounts is expected to provide more information.
The families of eight victims who sued Mr. Jones in Connecticut had filed an emergency motion asking Judge Lopez to block a court’s ruling last week granting Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, who sued Mr. Jones in Texas, the right to seize Mr. Jones’s business bank accounts, which contain roughly $2 million. Mr. Heslin and Ms. Lewis are the parents of Jesse Lewis, 6, who died at Sandy Hook.
Their court fight comes nearly a dozen years after 20 children and six educators died in the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., and Mr. Jones’s years of lies that it was a hoax and the families were complicit in the plot. The families suffered such online abuse and death threats that in 2018 relatives of 10 victims sued Mr. Jones for defamation and were awarded more than $1.4 billion in damages in trials in Texas and Connecticut.
Mr. Jones has nowhere near that money: He and his business have $9 million in assets. His company had declared bankruptcy after the judgments, as Mr. Jones had previously for his personal assets. On June 14, Judge Lopez ordered those personal assets to be liquidated and sold, with the proceeds distributed among the Sandy Hook families.
But the judge dismissed a separate bankruptcy for Mr. Jones’s business, Free Speech Systems, encouraging the families to pursue their rights to collect from Mr. Jones in state court, leading to Mr. Heslin’s and Ms. Lewis’s filing. The dismissal came after the Connecticut side rejected a multiyear potential settlement with Mr. Jones that would have paid out more money to the families, but which they said couldn’t be trusted.
The Texas families were happy with the judge’s dismissal, but the Connecticut families said it would create a free-for-all to file separate claims for money from Mr. Jones’s business, which is now the issue before Judge Lopez.
Lawyers for the families have been scrapping behind the scenes, accusing each other of trying to claim a disproportionate share of Mr. Jones’s meager assets. The conflict burst into the open during the June 14 hearing.
“Maybe one family will get all of it,” Kyle Kimpler, a lawyer for the Connecticut families, said in that hearing. “Maybe another family will get nothing.”
The trustee liquidating Mr. Jones’s personal assets, Christopher Murray, also objected to the Texas court’s seizure order.
“The specter of a pell-mell seizure of F.S.S.’s assets, including its cash, threatens to throw the business into chaos, potentially stopping it in its tracks,” he wrote in a court filing last week, using the abbreviation for Free Speech Systems. He asked Judge Lopez to pause legal actions targeting the business assets while he works on “an orderly wind-down” of Free Speech Systems’ operations.
Lawyers for the two sets of families issued dueling statements after Thursday’s hearing.
“The Connecticut families have always sought a fair and equitable distribution of Free Speech System’s assets for all of the families, and today’s decision sets us back on that path,” said Chris Mattei, a lawyer for the Connecticut families. “We are pleased that the bankruptcy court instructed the Chapter 7 trustee not to turn over F.S.S. property or bank accounts to any party at this time.”
Mark Bankston, a lawyer for the families who sued Mr. Jones in Texas, including Mr. Heslin and Ms. Lewis, said in his statement that “our clients are frustrated that they will not be allowed to pursue their state court rights after all.” He added, “Apparently this case will remain in limbo, all while one group of plaintiffs refuses to have all the plaintiffs treated equally.”
The Connecticut lawyers have said that the size of their clients’ jury award entitles them to a greater proportion of Alex Jones’s assets, writing in their emergency filing that they “hold more than 95 percent of liquidated claims.” But they are barred from seeking assets through state courts while Mr. Jones’s appeal of the $1.4 billion verdict proceeds.
The Texas side has said that any money recovered should be divided equally among the relatives. This week, Mr. Bankston said that the Connecticut lawyers had rebuffed the Texas lawyers’ offer — reiterated after the June 14 hearing dismissing the business bankruptcy — to share any money recovered through state courts equally among both sets of relatives.
“The attorneys for the Connecticut plaintiffs have consistently refused an equitable distribution,” he said. “They insist, despite the exceedingly small pool of recovery they caused to happen, that they are entitled to nearly all amounts collected from Jones.”
Mr. Mattei and his colleague on the case, Alinor Sterling, did not respond to questions sent to them and to Andrew Friedman, their public relations contractor.
Fueling the rancor is the lawyers’ discovery through bankruptcy filings that Mr. Jones’s empire — chiefly his online and radio show, and lucrative sales of diet supplements and survival gear — is worth far less than they believed when they won the damages.
Mr. Jones has only $9 million in personal and business assets combined. Divided equally among the families, that would net less than $500,000 each. That number could dwindle by up to one-quarter, because Mr. Jones’s substantial legal bills must be paid first. There is potentially more money if the families can claim ongoing revenue from Free Speech Systems.
The post Sandy Hook Families’ Fight for Alex Jones’s Money Takes an Ugly Turn appeared first on New York Times.
God bless those children. Their parents are like fat pigs at the trough, behavior bordering on despicable.
Reminds me of those African turkey buzzards ripping at the carcass the lion killed, hyenas and jackals darting in and out between lion-paw swipes at them.
Feral Lawfare.
The Bill of Rights is in tatters.
Would it be ironic if all these families got into a raging gun battle over the dissolution of Alex Jones’ assets? :-P
I feel very bad indeed for the kids...and school staff...who died that day. But the families of those who died are absolute filth. And so are their lawyers.
Watch the “Grieving Families” turn into phookin animals.
And the Lawyers get the first cut.
How much will be left after their done?
At this point, after the grieving and number of years past the shootings, going after monetary restitution is about greed. No amount of money is going to bring back the children. Parents and other family members can continue to grieve, and the money is not a way to stop the grieving.
If they can get the money, fine, but nobody believes at this point that it’s about making Jones pay for the disrespect shown by his words. It might be punishment, but the fight for the money is mostly about greed.
Yup. Grievance money always brings out the ugly side of people. Toxic entitlement.
So. sounds like internecine machinations amongst the awardees. I guess in the end it all boils down to money.
Remember, we are a democracy! Whoop!
Only Putin’s Russia uses lawfare, financial seizure, voter fraud, institutional corruption and mass surveillance to silence political opponents of the central govt and ruling party!
Fighting over damages that were not suffered, revenge for hurt feelings.
I pray they do not profit, and it brings them misery from their ill-gotten gains. Granted it is tragic, but they do not have the right to do this as it is pure Lawfare.
What did he say that allows them to take his money?
Divided equally among the families, that would net less than $500,000 each. That number could dwindle by up to one-quarter, because Mr. Jones’s substantial legal bills must be paid first.
= = =
Is the $500K before their lawyers suck their % ?
I kind of think the family lawyers are continuing to push the parents, promising them big $, and ‘Getting Jones off the air’, while expecting a % of a BIG pile (which isn’t there -oops_.
It is not a serious judgement, it is an emotional one.
Legal system is dysfunctional or it would have recognized this damage award is nonsense.
The legal system is very broken.
Things liberals and the government don't like.
This is about breaking him. It has nothing to do with anything he said or did. That's all just an excuse, and the dysfunctional legal system is the weapon.
Bkmk
Ultimately the only winners will be the legal beagles after billing thousands of ‘billable hours’ while encouraging lawsuit after lawsuit. As the total legal bill approaches the 1.4b figure I would expect the legal activity to subside.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.