Posted on 06/25/2024 11:04:03 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
The Centers for Disease Prevention and Control and Prevention estimates infections are growing or likely growing in 39 states. While the agency no longer keeps track of the number of coronavirus cases, its latest data is based on emergency department visits and wastewater testing in each state.
Most of the states where infections are believed to be growing are along the coasts, including California, Oregon, Washington, Florida, Maryland, Virginia and the Carolinas. Some states in the Northeast, Deep South and Great Lakes region have also been labeled as “growing.”
Based on the data, California, Arizona and Florida are experiencing the highest percentage of probability for an increase in infections.
The CDC said there are no states that are showing a decline in
(Excerpt) Read more at mprnews.org ...
Time to wear our N-95 masks again.
How come there’s a winter surge and a summer surge and so forth?
BS. It isn’t here.
why would a “summer surge” be anticipated?
Remember back when they said sunlight slowed the transmission of the virus and all that bull?
Remember when they said it would peak in the fall and winter of 2020 because that’s when cold and flue season starts?
Now, we have an election 4+ months and there’s going to be a “summer surge”. heh
Why test? It is a 3-day cold.
If you live in AZ or FL, you're dependent on air conditioning so you stayed inside.
No reason. But it's what liberals will do nowadays.
The only cure is Mail-in ballots and drop boxes.
If you aren’t vaxxed and have no symptoms, you are literally on death’s door.
It’s a 4 year cycle.
The DNC.24 Variant.
season variant ? more URINalists 
..forecasting " rain ".... ... 
... 
... 
.. 
.
“Why test? It is a 3-day cold”
Not necessarily.....it hits people differently.
My symptoms were flu like for 3 days, when I was getting over it my wife got it and it hit her pretty hard.....uncontrolled fever for 5 days.
Having said all that, none of it is going to convince me to get one of those damn shots...especially not this latest fear porn.....anyway, now that we’ve had it we have natural immunity....the fear mongers hate when you use those 2 dreaded words. Lol!
Some of the wording in the article, “estimates”, “believed to be”, “highest probability of....”.
Sounds like it is all just as likely as not, to be true or based on any facts or science.
ChatGPT
The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly authorize the government to assume undefined emergency powers. However, certain provisions and interpretations have been used to justify expanded governmental authority during emergencies. Key Constitutional Provisions and Interpretations:
Article II - Executive Powers:
The President is vested with the "executive power" and is designated as the Commander in Chief of the armed forces. This has been interpreted to grant the President certain implied powers to act decisively in emergencies, especially related to national security and foreign threats.
Suspension Clause (Article I, Section 9):
This clause allows for the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus "when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." This suggests some constitutional recognition of the need for extraordinary measures in extreme situations.
War Powers and the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8):
Congress has the power to declare war, raise and support armies, and "make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper" for executing its powers. These provisions have been used to justify broad legislative authority during emergencies, including economic and national security crises.
Historical Context and Judicial Interpretations:
Lincoln and the Civil War:
President Abraham Lincoln took significant emergency actions during the Civil War, including suspending habeas corpus without congressional approval. Although controversial, these actions were later ratified by Congress and generally upheld by the courts.
Korematsu v. United States (1944):
During World War II, the Supreme Court upheld the internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity, demonstrating deference to executive authority in emergencies, though this decision has since been widely criticized.
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952):
The Supreme Court limited executive power by ruling that President Truman could not seize steel mills during the Korean War without congressional authorization, emphasizing that the President's power must stem either from an act of Congress or the Constitution itself.
Post-9/11 Measures:
Following the September 11 attacks, Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act, granting the executive branch significant powers to combat terrorism. The Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) provided broad authority to the President to use force against those responsible for the attacks, illustrating how legislative action can expand executive power in emergencies.
Conclusion:
While the Constitution does not explicitly grant undefined emergency powers, it provides a framework that has been interpreted to allow for expanded governmental authority in times of crisis. This authority is often a combination of executive action, legislative support, and judicial interpretation. The balance of power and the limits of emergency authority continue to be subjects of legal and political debate.
ChatGPT
Yes, you're correct. The concise answer is "no." The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly authorize the government to assume undefined emergency powers. Any expansion of powers during emergencies generally stems from specific provisions that are subject to interpretation, legislative enactments, and judicial rulings rather than from an inherent, undefined emergency power.
What percentage of these claims are in previously gene juice jabbed and boosted? It seems they’re the only ones getting it two, three and four times.
A curious fact omitted in this investigation
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.