Time to wear our N-95 masks again.
How come there’s a winter surge and a summer surge and so forth?
BS. It isn’t here.
why would a “summer surge” be anticipated?
Remember back when they said sunlight slowed the transmission of the virus and all that bull?
Remember when they said it would peak in the fall and winter of 2020 because that’s when cold and flue season starts?
Now, we have an election 4+ months and there’s going to be a “summer surge”. heh
Why test? It is a 3-day cold.
The only cure is Mail-in ballots and drop boxes.
If you aren’t vaxxed and have no symptoms, you are literally on death’s door.
It’s a 4 year cycle.
Some of the wording in the article, “estimates”, “believed to be”, “highest probability of....”.
Sounds like it is all just as likely as not, to be true or based on any facts or science.
ChatGPT
The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly authorize the government to assume undefined emergency powers. However, certain provisions and interpretations have been used to justify expanded governmental authority during emergencies. Key Constitutional Provisions and Interpretations:
Article II - Executive Powers:
The President is vested with the "executive power" and is designated as the Commander in Chief of the armed forces. This has been interpreted to grant the President certain implied powers to act decisively in emergencies, especially related to national security and foreign threats.
Suspension Clause (Article I, Section 9):
This clause allows for the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus "when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." This suggests some constitutional recognition of the need for extraordinary measures in extreme situations.
War Powers and the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8):
Congress has the power to declare war, raise and support armies, and "make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper" for executing its powers. These provisions have been used to justify broad legislative authority during emergencies, including economic and national security crises.
Historical Context and Judicial Interpretations:
Lincoln and the Civil War:
President Abraham Lincoln took significant emergency actions during the Civil War, including suspending habeas corpus without congressional approval. Although controversial, these actions were later ratified by Congress and generally upheld by the courts.
Korematsu v. United States (1944):
During World War II, the Supreme Court upheld the internment of Japanese Americans as a wartime necessity, demonstrating deference to executive authority in emergencies, though this decision has since been widely criticized.
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952):
The Supreme Court limited executive power by ruling that President Truman could not seize steel mills during the Korean War without congressional authorization, emphasizing that the President's power must stem either from an act of Congress or the Constitution itself.
Post-9/11 Measures:
Following the September 11 attacks, Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act, granting the executive branch significant powers to combat terrorism. The Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) provided broad authority to the President to use force against those responsible for the attacks, illustrating how legislative action can expand executive power in emergencies.
Conclusion:
While the Constitution does not explicitly grant undefined emergency powers, it provides a framework that has been interpreted to allow for expanded governmental authority in times of crisis. This authority is often a combination of executive action, legislative support, and judicial interpretation. The balance of power and the limits of emergency authority continue to be subjects of legal and political debate.
ChatGPT
Yes, you're correct. The concise answer is "no." The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly authorize the government to assume undefined emergency powers. Any expansion of powers during emergencies generally stems from specific provisions that are subject to interpretation, legislative enactments, and judicial rulings rather than from an inherent, undefined emergency power.
What percentage of these claims are in previously gene juice jabbed and boosted? It seems they’re the only ones getting it two, three and four times.
A curious fact omitted in this investigation
Yes it may be fake. But this time those heavily vaxxed are expected to come down with hard to treat respiratory illnesses because their immune systems are damaged. This time there really can be a big impact. But, there are still liars out there prepping for the election so yeah, it may be more smoke and mirrors.
I tracked this alarmist article back to the original data, so you don’t have to. You’re welcome. The article is essentially lying. The data shows a year-on-year decline in cases. There is a slight recent uptick, but it is meaningless in light of the earlier year data. Also, the article states we don’t know exactly how many cases there are. We only find out if someone gets tested. In other words, the symptoms are mild enough people aren’t going to the doctor. The author is lying for either politics or clicks or both.
Excluding this COVID nonsense, there is a nasty viral bug going around. This bug arrived at Disney when the Father’s Day crowds arrived.
Knocked me on my behind for 2 days.
My sister and her husband who have had 8 shots each just found out they both have it. It’s a head cold with some fatigue. At least they aren’t panicking. They honestly thought that as long as they kept their boosters up, they would never get it.
Do NOT take any more dangerous “ vaccines “.
Take one Ivermectin tablet as soon as you feel the onset of a virus, and another tablet 8 hours later.
Very rapid recovery, very cheap, and very safe.
Meanwhile, nobody has had a summer cold since August, 2019.