|
Posted on 06/13/2024 8:18:21 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Truly, it is in the darkness that one finds the light,
so when we are in sorrow,
then this light is nearest of all to us.
Meister Eckhart
Looks like as of July 2012 Neil Heslin was having financial troubles - committing financial crimes. See https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/Neil-Heslin-Father-of-Sandy-Hook-Victim-Faces-16894829.php
Seems like he’s doing a lot better financially ever since the alleged shooting...
I’ve been trying to see what evidence was actually presented in Alex Jones’s trial and what discovery was allowed. I can’t find much except boilerplate reports. But at https://apnews.com/article/alex-jones-connecticut-lawsuits-shootings-school-c4cd4f3f1aa69a73659b639a6f8df521 it seems that the evidence they ordered Jones to produce was about his finances and computer analytics, not about the truth of anything he said or allowed to be said on his show. And it sounds like the only “evidence” the families presented was about Jones’s finances and about them receiving harassment. And actually, I don’t know if they showed texts or had any other physical evidence for their claims.
Sounds like the judges basically said that since Jones didn’t present the financial and computer analytics data, he must be guilty of defamation, without anybody going into any evidence regarding what really happened that day, or any of the reasons that Jones suspected the attack might never have happened.
Don’t mean to talk to myself...
At https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q4kUKjRGRA in his press conference the coroner says the families did not get to see their loved ones but were given a photograph. The bodies were going to be sent to the morticians. So the claim in court by the father who said he held his child with a bullet wound to the head is not accurate, unless the mortician allowed that after the body was placed in the casket.
A FEMA tent was set up to put the bodies in until they were transported to the coroner’s office around 1am the next morning. That seems like a goofy timeline to me, given that the alleged shooting happened around 10am on Friday morning. Autopsies started at 6am on Saturday, he said. The presence of the FEMA tent would support the suggestion that there was a drill going on.
I’m wondering how many children were injured and taken to the hospital. Or are they claiming that a guy whose dad said he can’t even tie his shoes managed to kill everybody he hit?
Even after allegedly shooting himself, there was no DNA from Adam Lanza anywhere on the gun.
I was able to find this at https://www.timesofisrael.com/sandy-hook-victims-father-wins-case-against-authors-who-claim-shooting-was-hoax/:
“A redacted copy of the actual death certificate is attached to Pozner’s lawsuit. Additionally, Pozner has had DNA samples taken and compared to those provided by the Connecticut medical examiner to prove that Noah was his son. He has put Noah’s birth certificate, report cards and medical records into the public file in his legal actions.
His goal, he says, is to make sure that “normal people” have access to the truth and aren’t persuaded by the hoaxers.”
If that is true, it would be good to see what he submitted with the lawsuit. I suppose it would be in the court documents somewhere...
Based on https://www.tracepointllc.com/single-post/2016/04/22/What-You-Need-to-Know-About-Post-Mortem-DNA-Paternity-Testing , there should be blood samples stored for all the alleged victims so it should be possible to prove whether those victims were seen by the coroner.
So anyway, based on that it appears that there WAS evidence offered to disprove what Alex Jones speculated. That changes my view of what happened in court. At least for right now, I’m going to stop investigating Sandy Hook.
Happy Father’s Day to all the FR dads!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
