https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1782971135103316377
April 23, 2024
Posted on 04/25/2024 1:35:28 AM PDT by ransomnote
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1782971135103316377
April 23, 2024
the female parent is crazy and thinks this is just great for their child.
That’s exactly what it is, abuse. Sexual, emotional and spiritual abuse.
Every Which Way But Loose?
No, it starred Martin Mull...................
🔝🔝🔝 bUMP to an older thread
What the HECK is wrong with those parents?????????
My thought too, as most everyone looks like a homo when Clint Eastwood's around.
Writing from the future here (December 4, 2024) and the Supreme Court is deliberating on "gender affirming care". I believe Free Republic members getting the word out and badgering their representatives were one pebble dropped in the pond to make this positive wave. GOOD JOB, EVERYONE!
Committed to the Democrat Transgender Insanity I guess
(I believe Free Republic members getting the word out and badgering their representatives were one pebble dropped in the pond to make this positive wave. GOOD JOB, EVERYONE!)
👍👍👍
What parent thinks - hey this will be good for little Johnny? I guess the evil demonic demons have corrupted parents or the parents are gay/nuts.
bfl
My lesbian neighbors unironically flew the gay and palestinian flags next to each other.
I see the child instinctly backing away from that assault.
Oh yeah - freaky freak in front of him
Odd. I don't remember your house being set up to lock people in permanently...
My God, that is SO grotesque. I cannot believe that A) any human could behave like that and B) any parent would take their child to something like that.
I’ve seen lots of films and gifs of such grotesque “shows” by trannies and all are bad, but that one takes the cake.
There are trans people who say someone like that is not trans. They say when they became trans decades ago, it was painfully important that no one ever knew they were trans. They HAD to pass as the opposite sex and they never wanted anyone to know.
SO they point to exhibitionists - men with beards and makeup, gyrating like prostitutes - and they say those are not trans, but are people who are sexually gratified by envisioning themselves (dressing up) as women (autogynophelia).
That repulsive man in the video is not trying to hide or really, to pass. He’s enjoying sexual gratification as both an intact male and a drag woman, and slithering next to children satiates his need to get in people’s face (he’s extremely aggressive).
One of those perverts is Lily Tino (a male). He’s a major grifter, and loves to go to restaurants and get extremely offended if anyone calls him ‘sir’. He has been going into women’s bathrooms in Disneyland (dressed as an obvious man wearing makeup and women’s clothes) and photographing himself. He does it because he knows the women don’t want him there.
Some trans say he’s an intact male whose pictures are trophies of the women whose right to privacy he’s violated.
That one is now in legal trouble because he posted pics of women and a girl in those bathrooms. He’s pretending his feelings are hurt. I hope he goes to jail.
But the dancer is the most repulsive that has made it to a gif. I’m sure there are worse. And I do think they are simply predatory perverted males - whether they are ‘intact’ or not.
When I moved to San Francisco fresh out of college in 1973, Finocchio’s Club on Broadway featured “female impersonators.” It operated from 1936 to 1999. It was a favorite of the local weird sex scene. But was a huge attraction for out-of-town men in San Fran on business.
Interestingly, in 1936 Finocchio’s nightclub raided by the police and five female impersonators were arrested, along with the owners of the club. Get this. The owners weren’t arrested for hosting lewd shows. No, the owners were arrested for employing entertainers on a percentage basis which was reputed to lead to entertainers mingling with male customers, trading attention and sexual favors for drinks at an inflated price. Following the police raid, the owners moved Finocchio’s to a different location, hired more entertainers, and stopped employing the entertainers on a percentage basis.
Imagine that! “Entertainers” at female impersonator clubs or strip joints sold sexual favors!
Finnochios was an accommodation with society. The weirdos could have their own place and didn’t need to be out ruining civil society. That is a reasonable solution to the whole mess...if only the perverts would agree to it. But that bird flew the coop long ago.
I always have to laugh when I watch old TV westerns and the “saloon girls” are hustling the customers to buy them drinks. Being TV with a strict code, they could never say what the saloon girls really did to make a living. But they were no doubt working on a percentage basis.
But Grok says “No, not all saloon girls in the Old West were prostitutes. Saloon girls, often called ‘dance hall girls’ or ‘hurdy-gurdy girls,’ had varied roles. Many worked as entertainers, serving drinks, dancing with patrons, or performing songs to liven up saloons. Some engaged in prostitution, either by choice or economic necessity, as it could be lucrative in male-dominated frontier towns. However, others were simply employees earning a living through legitimate work like waitressing or hosting. The stereotype of saloon girls as prostitutes comes from sensationalized accounts, but historical records show their roles were diverse, shaped by the rough-and-tumble environment of the West.”
But night clubs and saloons kept the gaudy part of life somewhat hidden away from polite society.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.