ransomnote: After your abusive posts to me (here and here), I don't want you to ping me.
For example, in today's instance, you can post my content re Guiliani and Sidney Powell and contradict it without pinging me.
Posted on 03/16/2024 10:02:38 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
It is high time that we rid ourselves (as a start) of 2 National recognition periods.
1) National doctors day
2) National nurses week
The standards for these 2 professions has fallen to septic tank levels and large numbers of them have participated in directly or stood by silently in mass murder and bodily harm.
I’m sure we can still find good ones, but the professions in the aggregate hardy deserve a day or week of accolades and back patting…
here is another side...
https://www.chicagomag.com/real-estate/November-2020/Could-Trump-Lose-Trump-Tower-Chicago/
Consider this- New York is broke, they seize and sell Trump assets and subsequently LOSE the appeal. They’re on the hook for all of it then. Or what if they do that, the market craters, and they lose the appeal? Trump would get the siezed value back and be able to repurchase at a steep discount.
Most of these NY idiots are going to end up living in cardboard boxes when this is over and done with in the best of cases, or if this goes to chaos get justicized during it…
500 million…
New York would turn around and sell Trump Tower to China before the ink is dry on the lien.
Vietnam: Communist Party Accepts Second Presidential Resignation in 15 Months
And now, a very important election message from president Joe Biden...
https://youtu.be/7iwfEKISHrs?si=TeB8fz8yfOQBZ7rQ
I doubt he could ever retrieve his wealth. Against New York state? It is a civil case and I can tell you - once suing State Farm Insurance - if they don't pay you face a real challenge getting your money - and my judgment was Cracker Jacks compared to Trump's. SFI posts a state bond; I wrote the state insurance commissioner (Bill Nelson at that time) with a notarized copy of my court judgment and asked him to seize their bond... Bill Nelson❗ Ha❗ State law required that they pay my judgment in 30 days. 🤷
I went to a large State Farm office here and started noting inventory numbers of various pieces of office equipment; I was not angry or aggressive in any way. Finally a secretary asked if I would mind explaining what I was doing. I smiled and explained that I was required by law to identify specifically the equipment that I was going to have the sheriff seize to satisfy my court judgement - I showed her a copy of the court order.
Within 15 minutes an executive from the top floor came to meet me with a check❗ Do you think that they knew who I was❓ That Bill Nelson told them not to bother with a small fry like me❓
I do not understand why DJT has let these gangsters put him in this disastrous situation✅❌
WTF?
Priceless. Ha!😄
Your complaint stands all over the land. You’re absolutely correct. The lack of action is screaming, at this point. Normies don’t get-it either.
The only thing standing out is Trump and his popularity. That seems to be driving a stake into the heart of the beast.
This is just too good, Michael Waltz destroys the small well. (Waltz is yet another of our Fla. rock stars. We are loaded with them!)
Benny Johnson
@bennyjohnson
🚨SAVAGE
@michaelgwaltz
brutally ROASTS Swalwell:
“I find it incredibly rich Mr. Swalwell was going to come to this committee and lecture us about how China penetrates our government. I think that’s something he may know a thing or two about..”
https://twitter.com/i/status/1770564906867208660
interesting find
iirc, trump has been big into licensing his name brand
wonder how much of his property is actually owned by a separate corporate entity or gen limited partnership....and not even in his name, as owner, today.
maybe trump doesn’t own anything letitia can attach??
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/16/2024 Vol.489, Q Day 2331, stylin19a wrote: what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.ransomnote: Your reliance on invective to conceal your inferior arguments and discourage others from debating is the reason why I have asked you at least twice already not to put my name in the address of any rebuttal to my content you post. I'll add a third request at the bottom of my post which I will therefore have to address directly to you, although my prior posts have observed your request that I not address you directly.
There ya go again, picking and choosing what phrases words to respond to. Gaslighting again.ransomnote: I don't know what you are referring to but I should think peeps would be grateful I did not reply to every line as my posts are lengthy enough when I just focus on key points.I'm puzzled why you would take that tactic when your earllier post today implied there was so much you could dispprove ("where to start?") and then you chose a second tier consideration. You conceded that the chronology matched the sequence of couples (the most critical point) and then pounced on the leftside/rightside issue as if it were the linchpin to our discussion.
You don't follow my doom posts ? But you don't admit when you do follow me and ignore me calling you out when you do follow it ? and instead decide to call out my phrasing ? Nice try.ransomnote: I usually ignore most of your posts (I don't read them) because you seem to focus on undermine posters and their constructive theorizing. I sometimes read them, I rarely respond. You're not worth time and effort.
What did you research and where is it ? From where? I understand tradition. (Sitting Presidents generally do not attend first lady funerals - mostly because of security disruptions.)
Where is this tradition honored? And what is the "protocol" about why they sit where they sit ? Maybe we are discussing apples and oranges.
What exactly is the "position of honor" for first ladies at a first lady funeral ? right or left
Generally, regardless of whose funeral they are usually seated in the order in which they are president - current to farthest...except when they aren't.In researching this post I've seen you throw question after question like I'm supposed to invest in you when your posts don't merit it.It's up to the administration to decide whether to honor certain traditions, or not. Obviously the Trump administration honors the tradition of seating in order in which they were President, and elects the style of leftside/rightside seating in use.Barbara Bush Funeral - April 2018 - Presidents to The Right?
ransomnote: No, Presidents to the left. President Trump did not attend Barbara Bush's funeral, but honorary space for him was reserved to the left of Melania in the photo.From overhead photos, that's the only row with a gap like that on the aisle.By the way...here is the Federal Register. It contains all the E.O.s back to FDR. Been here a good while.
https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents
You are welcome.ransomnote: The fact that the Federal Register remains is irrelevant to our discussion. I was noticing an odd, time consuming, needless change in WhiteHouse.gov's website regarding Biden's EO's.
I had been using Whitehouse.gov for EO's and EO text because I preferred its formatting when I transferred content to FR and using it put me close to other Whitehouse.gov content of interest. When someone 'removed' all prior EO's from Biden's WHitehouse.gov website, I started using federalregister.gov.
I don't actually believe the content of the original Whitehouse.gov was moved; I believe the webpage designs were updated to ARCHIVE titles and imagery. They would save so much time and effort if they just redirected the Whitehouse.gov domain to search a different IP Address, or used some other means of modifying the directories, modifying the appearance of the original, and creating a new webpage for Brandon. That would make sense to me as I don't believe the Biden crew has passwords for key infrastructure.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ransomnote: In post 748 , you 'back door responded' to my post without pinging me. I appreciated that because I've asked you at least twice not to ping me because you tend toward pointless inciviity and abusive confrontation. Here's the address line in your post 748:
Apparently you didn't like my post 767 because in your next post you responded to me directly, and angrily accused me of being gutless for not pinging you, even though you previously asked me not to do so.
Here's your post 809.
In that post you said you don't recall asking me not to ping you. If you really did not recall my 'No Pings' request then that means, according to your own standards, you are gutless for back door responding (not pinging me) in your post 748, and that, "You used to be better than that."
I don't believe you would have carefully specified WHY you were responding to me (809). "I will now respond to you because of it," unless you recalled my no-ping request. FReeQs respond to each others' rebuttals without telling anyone WHY they are responding, unless there's a previous 'no-ping' request in play. You back door posted in 748 and then justified violating my no ping request by falsely accusing me of back door posting, which is gutless of you by my standards.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you're just an innocent, but otherwise gutless guy, with fallen standards and a bad memory who can't remember that I already asked you 2 - 3 times not to ping me, I am here to help.
STOP PINGING ME. That's my third NO PING request to you. WRITE THIS DOWN SOMEWHERE SAFE.
Asking you to limit your pings to thread business only didn't work because you replied to my request with content-free insults. Here's an example of one of my prior requests (beneath the double lines) that you stop posting to me because you employ abusive verbiage.
I've previously asked you not to ping me because you are abusive (excerpt below). I'll add this link because it exposes you employing troll tactics to disrupt the thread and then lying about it when I pointed it out. There's also cheap shot type insults which you offer before you resume trying to blend in like a normal FReeQ.
Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 07/26/2023 Vol.467, Q Day 2089
😊 I believe that victory is coming❗ In the face of incredible growing darkness - VICTORY IS COMING! By the Will of the Lord✅ Yes actions of people will manifest that victory -- BUT it is by the Will of the Lord💯%
At times I may appear to lack faith and confidence; evil can appear so overwhelming. But by faith I believe that the Lord will bring about recompense over all the damages of this evil👈 I am a fighter and we are all now called to be warriors... never give up - like I never gave up against State Farm Insurance (a company to be very wary of😬)
’ll donate 1k to FR if it happens before 11/5
If it doesn’t you donate a hundo.
That’s 10/1, but I’ll take it. I wanted 50/1.
I’ll go 10/1 for 50.
Putin humors Macron. Thankfully, Putin does not scold Pierre, nor bore the French brass, with interminable lectures by pen, cable or keyboard, about how always much smarter he is than the other guy: 🤣
🇷🇺🇫🇷 Call “Volga”
Now also in French!
REMEMBER THESE PHRASES, REMEMBER THE NUMBER
French soldiers in Ukraine can get in touch to surrender. “
— Intel Slava Z tgram
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.