Posted on 12/24/2023 1:00:16 PM PST by ransomnote
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
*********************************************
No.
Press release from December 28: Maine Secretary of State Decision in Challenge to Trump Presidential Primary Petitions
Then go HERE to read p.15-16, “Section C. Mr. Trump’s False Claims Regarding the 2020 Election Do Not Disqualify Him Under the Twenty-Second Amendment.”
In the final sentence of that section, it states, “Therefore, given Mr. Trump has only won a single election for President, he is not barred from being elected to the same office again under the Twenty-Second Amendment."
Well, I certainly managed to mess up those links!
Give me a few and I’ll try to figure out what I did wrong in the HTML.
An interesting development from the Maine monkey. I guess you’d have to ‘prove’ that. Talk about dumping the apple cart.
“Maine Secretary of State Decision in Challenge to Trump Presidential Primary Petitions”
https://www.maine.gov/sos/news/2023/BellowsDecisionChallengeTrumpPrimaryPetitionsDec2023.html
Ruling of the Secretary of State (Maine) - Section C, p.15-16
https://www.maine.gov/sos/news/2023/Decision%20in%20Challenge%20to%20Trump%20Presidential%20Primary%20Petitions.pdf
I don’t dispute his dispute. 😄
Conte, and these reporters of the event, were not there to see anything, firsthand. I think my source’s source-information was imperfect, as well, for sure.
There’s nothing academically or theologically that is very certifiable on Conte, other than he is a layman and as far as I checked, on google, it was he alone who provided it.
I copied one complaint among his more general assertions, here:
” WARNING: Do not Trust Ronald L. Conte’s Catechism of Catholic Ethics
While trying to discern my Faith and morality, I have used google to perform some research about Catholic teachings on sexual ethics in marriage, etc. I believe this is a very common search for questioning young people who have questions about the faith in this aspect of life. This website is one of the first google results if you google “Catholic Sexual Teaching” or “Catholic Sexual Ethics.”
It is a website known as www.catechism.cc. This is deceptive as it is NOT an approved church document. It is not the Catechism of the Catholic Church, as it advertises. It is the “Catechism of Catholic Ethics”, a compilation written by a man named Robert L. Conte. He claims to be a lay Catholic theologian with a bachelor’s in philosophy and theology. However, he teaches as if authoritatively, but in a very deceptive way.
This particular page makes claims that directly refute the teachings of the Theology of the Body. “....
~~~
Time will surely reveal the veracity of this story. 🤔.
Very interesting. Thanks for the follow-up.
Funny but fake.
Wish it was real.
Thank you for that info.
I suspect you are right.
🙏🙏🙏
Is this Real(?) that SNL actually went Live with this Clinton scandal? 😳
.
So how is Maine using the 22nd amendment as justification to bar PDJT from the ballot?
ThankQ SvD !
Lyby, it looks like Maine backed down:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4205610/posts?page=771#771
A very important story.
Honestly, the tentacles are into the smallest of entities as well as the large. Both have an unaccountable title, and a presence near US trouble-making, foreign and domestic.
THERE ARE REAL PEOPLE WITH NAME$ AND FACE$ BEHIND THESE ORGS.
Non-Profit Organizations NPO
Non-Government Organizations NGO
Thinking Haiti, for just one, for starters.
So how is Maine using the 22nd amendment as justification to bar PDJT from the ballot?
**********************************************
The decision states that is NOT the justification.
As I shared in post #801:
In the final sentence of that section (“Section C. Mr. Trump’s False Claims Regarding the 2020 Election Do Not Disqualify Him Under the Twenty-Second Amendment.”), it states, “Therefore, given Mr. Trump has only won a single election for President, he is not barred from being elected to the same office again under the Twenty-Second Amendment.”
it looks like Maine backed down
********************************************
Reading the final paragraph of the decision (pdf, p.34), the Maine SoS, writes: “I will suspend the effect of my decision until the Superior Court rules on any appeal, or the time to appeal... has expired.”
“Can you explain the significance?”
~~~~~~~
Here you go...
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/4206558/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.