Posted on 12/04/2023 6:46:13 AM PST by Red Badger
Eight of the nine men convicted of raping a 15-year-old girl in 2020 will not face jail time, according to German news outlet NIUS.
The 15-year-old girl was attending a party in Germany’s Hamburg Park in Sept. 2020 when she was allegedly dragged into the bushes and raped by 11 men, according to German news outlet NIUS.
Two of the men were acquitted, while nine were found guilty, but only one of the nine received a prison sentence. That 19-year-old defendant received only two years and nine months in prison, per NIUS.
The other eight defendants all received youth sentences of one to two years, which were all suspended under Germany’s preliminary probation law, the outlet reported.
The judgements are reportedly non-binding and not yet final, according to NIUS.
The German outlet noted that the 11 indicted suspects represented a range of nationalities. Four were German, while others hailed from Kuwait, Poland, Egypt, Libya and Iran.
A female psychiatrist testifying on behalf of the defendants argued that their alleged gang rape was a “means of releasing frustration and anger” stemming from their “migration experiences and socio-cultural homelessness,” according to the Hamburger Morgenpost.
Good point. It's been a while since I read the Quaran and some of the hadiths. But it seems like one of the requirements for rape to be good in Allah's eyes is that "your right hand possesses her" (meaning you shouldn't rape someone else's captured or purchased slave). Thus gang rape would actually be one kind of rape that's actually not permitted in Islam. I didn't think about that until now.
The other requirements are that she can't be a Muslim, nor married to a Muslim, and she must be old enough to have menstruated. If all of those requirements are met, then rape away you good, pious Muslim you. (In the teaching to rape men there is no minimum age limit, just that he's not a Muslim and that your right hand possess him.)
Liberalism is a cancer that makes the host delusional.
It does seem that women are going to have to put an end to this tear-jerking defense of non European cultures dominated by sociopathic males who rape children
Could someone please explain to me why the U.S. is in NATO. What are we helping to defend? They have willingly been invaded.
so that means 9 out of 10 people enjoys rape.
4 of the 19 were German?
Maybe legalized Germans I’d bet.
I don’t know if gang rape is somewhere in the Theology of Islam.
But we do know, that in Islamic countries, women’s activities are constrained. Women are supposed to be veiled head to toe in those places. Women are not supposed to be in public without a male relative.
In such places, if a woman is raped and had violated these restrictions, such as being out in public alone, or not being properly covered, she will have been said to have brought rape on herself.
Four were German”
Misleading. Technically German but we know the rest ,you can bet they aren’t named Willhelm.
It’s not like rape, rape.
Yeah, and I’m so sure the one from Poland is a Pole. /s
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2014/02/does-islam-allow-muslims-to-rape-female.html
As Muhammad’s armies raided town after town, they captured many women, who would often be sold or traded. Yet, since the Muslim men were a long way from their wives, they needed wisdom from Allah to guide them in their treatment of their female captives. Allah revealed:
Qur’an 23:1-6—The Believers must (eventually) win through—those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess—for (in their case) they are free from blame.
Qur’an 70:22-30—Not so those devoted to Prayer—those who remain steadfast to their prayer; and those in whose wealth is a recognized right for the (needy) who asks and him who is prevented (for some reason from asking); and those who hold to the truth of the Day Of Judgement; and those who fear the displeasure of their Lord—for their Lord’s displeasure is the opposite of Peace and Tranquility—and those who guard their chastity, except with their wives and the (captives) whom their right hands possess—for (then) they are not to be blamed.
Notice that Allah commands Muslims to abstain from sex, except with their wives and with “those whom their right hands possess.” Allah gave the same sexual rights to Muhammad:
Qur’an 33:50—O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war ...
The Muslim practice of having sex with captured women is reported often in the Hadith, where we learn that Muhammad’s only objection to sex with captives was his condemnation of birth control.
Sahih Muslim 3371—We went out with Allah’s Messenger on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing azl (withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger, and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
Sahih al-Bukhari 4138—We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the invasion of Bun Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus [same as “azl” above]. So when we intended to do coitus interruptus, we said: “How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us? We asked (him) about it and he said: “It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul till the Day of Resurrection is predestined to exist, it will exist.”
Sahih Muslim 3384—Jabir bin Abdullah reported that a person asked Allah’s Apostle saying: I have a slave-girl and I practice azl with her, whereupon Allah’s Messenger said: This cannot prevent that which Allah has decreed. The person then came (after some time) and said: Messenger of Allah, the slave-girl about whom I talked to you has conceived, whereupon Allah’s Messenger said: I am the servant of Allah and His Messenger.
Clearly, Muslims were taking full advantage of Muhammad’s teachings about female captives and slave girls. Nevertheless, Muslims eventually captured women along with their husbands, so they wondered if Allah would allow them to have sex with these married captives (since adultery is otherwise forbidden in Islam).
Allah gives his answer in the Qur’an:
Qur’an 4:24—Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess ...
Here’s the historical background for this verse:
Sunan Abu Dawud 2150—The Apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” That is to say, they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.
Thus, the Qur’an allows men to have sex with their female captives and slave girls, and the Hadith provides numerous examples of how this was practiced. Yet we must follow this fact through to its logical conclusion. Muslims decided to have sex with their captives, whom they were later going to sell. Some of these captives were women whose husbands and families had been slaughtered by Muslims. Others had husbands who had been captured by Muslims. Would these women gladly consent to sexual intercourse with men who had killed their families or taken their families captive, and who were simply going to sell them into slavery when they arrived at the next town? Certainly not. But since the Qur’an and Muhammad authorized sex with these women (and said nothing about seeking their permission), we can only conclude that Muhammad allowed his followers to rape their captives.
Satan has a very firm grip on Germany!
No need for the question mark.
The Germans were completely emasculated after World War II. Their women were raped en masse while their men were forced to watch, the country was split in half for 40+ years, and their children were given a constant bombardment of how evil their forefathers were. It will take another generation before memories get long and Germans find their courage again. And by then it might be too late.
And they call Islam a RELIGION.
Those people sure know how to “rationalize” , don’t they?
But the poor 15-year-old who was raped will remember the awful incident for the rest of her life.
And the rapists were our "allies", the wonderful freedom-loving liberators from RUSSIA.
A lot of the women raped by the Red Army towards the end of WWII were not Germans but from the nations that had just been “liberated” by the Russians. Part of the reason why Stalin decided to get rid of Tito was that he had not punished Milovan Djilas for complaining about the Red Army raping Yugoslav women during their assistance to the Partisans in the closing months of the war.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.