Posted on 12/03/2023 5:38:33 PM PST by george76
Your bipolar. You know everything.
I feel sorry for you unipolar half brains. I have a half dozen of impossible thoughts before getting out of bed. I plan my day putting on my socks. I’m three steps ahead of my opponents. I’m thinking of wearing a neck brace because all that brainpower is heavy.
I knew you knew everything!
Not ALL batches of the vaccine, but some of them. See message #17.
“So what I did with the data was look at the top ten batches that had a high death count, a high mortality rate, and I put them on a chart. So it’s got a batch ID, which is our internal number for a batch, but you can easily get the Pfizer batch ID from that.”
(Note the “top ten” part.)
4am to PC
For example, the average lifespan in the US of someone 80 years old is 8 years. If the likelihood of death is the same every year(not realistic but good for a first estimate), then the expected death rate is over 8% per year just from age. Make that even even worse by selecting nursing home patients instead of the general population and you can easily get over 20% over almost three years.
The 20% rate on certain batches demands investigation, not panic or witch-burning.
Your post is precisely on point and very thoughtful. Thanks.
Every Western nation is importing replacements so the census numbers won’t noticeably change.
That would be true, although I know they are an extremely Leftist government, and who knows what they would do to cover the tracks. I don’t put anything by Leftists anywheres.
That said, if one out of five people died above and beyond the annual mortalities that take place, that would be impossible to hide, IMO.
Except it wasn’t “Winston Smith’s” fault that the publisher Slay News misquoted him. He was saying some clusters, categorized by vaccinator or by administrative location, had extremely high death rates, as high as 30 percent. These numbers can’t be explained by coincidence, and occur across age groups.
Of course many drive-by posters on FR jumped on the headline without comprehending what the whistleblower, Mr. Smith, was actually saying, because they are intellectually lazy, and, in many cases, ideologically aligned with tyranny, or unwilling to confess their misplaced loyalty to the failed and dangerous jabs.
There’s always got to be one person that wants to drag facts and logic into rant storm. The people are being whipped into a frenzy over the headline and it’s gaining momentum and you want us to stop and read for comprehension?? Nobody’s got time for dat.
Not many bothered to read the article on that “20%” headline quote. I’m glad to this article have a little more detail.
News Link source : https://www.aussie17.com/p/new-zealand-government-data-administrator
FreeRepublic resource link : https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4200655/posts
LOL.....I think. Unless you're not joking!
Yes, by batch numbers, by vaccinators, and by jab-clinic location. Barry Young analyzed it statistically ('there are many ways to slice-and-dice the data' he said), and any way it was presented the numbers were very alarming.
For example, a vaccinator could have caused deaths (or at least increased the chances of death) by injecting the jab contents directly into the bloodstream (I think Pfizer says at least 4mm into the deltoid, but this is easy to foul up). Sometimes the vaccinator prefers to squeeze the skin at the injection site, then insert the needle, and that may cause the needle to miss the deltoid entirely.
Of course an individual batch could be contaminated with foreign matter -- or have many times more of the active ingredient than other batches (also a known problem).
And a locale having a statistically higher incidence of deaths warrants investigation too -- maybe they have multiple bad batches, or a combination of bad batches and bad vaccinator technique, or an especially older age group of subjects.
Personally I think every batch is "bad"; some batches may be worse than others.
Yes the kiwi government has been one of the most tyrannical in the world regarding the "vaccine" rollout.
New Zealand Government Data Suggests Alarming Pfizer Death Rate
BY J.R. Bruning, J.R. BRUNING DECEMBER 1, 2023
BROWNSTONE » BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE ARTICLES » NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT DATA SUGGESTS ALARMING PFIZER DEATH RATE
A statistician has come forward with disturbing information that, if correct, will promote doubt on the safety of mRNA vaccination for decades into the future. The whistleblower was involved with building and implementing the New Zealand government database vaccine payment system, a ‘pay per dose system’ that would remit payments to vaccination providers.
In an interview with New Zealand journalist and lawyer Liz Gunn, and using a false name of Winston Smith, the statistician states that
“Science is all about being sceptical and curious at the same time. We shouldn’t be criticised for being sceptical, we shouldn’t be vilified for having a different opinion. We should be allowed to have that.
Smith explained by way of introduction ‘I’m not anti-vax. I helped build the vaccination system. But I am pro-choice and I do believe in [the] fundamental freedoms of humans, and that we should not have a procedure forced onto us because of a mandate just to keep our jobs. That is against everything I stand for. It is a huge overreach by the government.’
Smith’s work also involved data analysis. Smith had noticed discrepancies almost immediately the system went live with people dying within a week of being injected.
Looking at the government data, he ran a query to identify days when more than one hundred and twenty people died in New Zealand. Historic peaks above this level, as Smith demonstrates, are rare. This normal distribution of deaths at this level is only rarely exceeded on the occasional day, or for disaster events, such as the 2011 Christchurch earthquake, mosque shooting in 2017, or an unusually bad influenza season.
In the small country of New Zealand, daily mortality levels that exceed one hundred and twenty could plausibly be considered to be a signal of a disaster event that should trigger public discussion and controversy.
New Zealand had a highly unusual winter flu season in June-July 2019, and no days exceeded the harm-signal level in 2020.
Excerpted:
https://brownstone.org/articles/new-zealand-government-data-suggests-alarming-pfizer-death-rate/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.